Cargando…

Adverse outcome pathways as a tool for the design of testing strategies to support the safety assessment of emerging advanced materials at the nanoscale

Toxicity testing and regulation of advanced materials at the nanoscale, i.e. nanosafety, is challenged by the growing number of nanomaterials and their property variants requiring assessment for potential human health impacts. The existing animal-reliant toxicity testing tools are onerous in terms o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halappanavar, Sabina, van den Brule, Sybille, Nymark, Penny, Gaté, Laurent, Seidel, Carole, Valentino, Sarah, Zhernovkov, Vadim, Høgh Danielsen, Pernille, De Vizcaya, Andrea, Wolff, Henrik, Stöger, Tobias, Boyadziev, Andrey, Poulsen, Sarah Søs, Sørli, Jorid Birkelund, Vogel, Ulla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32450889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12989-020-00344-4
_version_ 1783538568491171840
author Halappanavar, Sabina
van den Brule, Sybille
Nymark, Penny
Gaté, Laurent
Seidel, Carole
Valentino, Sarah
Zhernovkov, Vadim
Høgh Danielsen, Pernille
De Vizcaya, Andrea
Wolff, Henrik
Stöger, Tobias
Boyadziev, Andrey
Poulsen, Sarah Søs
Sørli, Jorid Birkelund
Vogel, Ulla
author_facet Halappanavar, Sabina
van den Brule, Sybille
Nymark, Penny
Gaté, Laurent
Seidel, Carole
Valentino, Sarah
Zhernovkov, Vadim
Høgh Danielsen, Pernille
De Vizcaya, Andrea
Wolff, Henrik
Stöger, Tobias
Boyadziev, Andrey
Poulsen, Sarah Søs
Sørli, Jorid Birkelund
Vogel, Ulla
author_sort Halappanavar, Sabina
collection PubMed
description Toxicity testing and regulation of advanced materials at the nanoscale, i.e. nanosafety, is challenged by the growing number of nanomaterials and their property variants requiring assessment for potential human health impacts. The existing animal-reliant toxicity testing tools are onerous in terms of time and resources and are less and less in line with the international effort to reduce animal experiments. Thus, there is a need for faster, cheaper, sensitive and effective animal alternatives that are supported by mechanistic evidence. More importantly, there is an urgency for developing alternative testing strategies that help justify the strategic prioritization of testing or targeting the most apparent adverse outcomes, selection of specific endpoints and assays and identifying nanomaterials of high concern. The Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework is a systematic process that uses the available mechanistic information concerning a toxicological response and describes causal or mechanistic linkages between a molecular initiating event, a series of intermediate key events and the adverse outcome. The AOP framework provides pragmatic insights to promote the development of alternative testing strategies. This review will detail a brief overview of the AOP framework and its application to nanotoxicology, tools for developing AOPs and the role of toxicogenomics, and summarize various AOPs of relevance to inhalation toxicity of nanomaterials that are currently under various stages of development. The review also presents a network of AOPs derived from connecting all AOPs, which shows that several adverse outcomes induced by nanomaterials originate from a molecular initiating event that describes the interaction of nanomaterials with lung cells and involve similar intermediate key events. Finally, using the example of an established AOP for lung fibrosis, the review will discuss various in vitro tests available for assessing lung fibrosis and how the information can be used to support a tiered testing strategy for lung fibrosis. The AOPs and AOP network enable deeper understanding of mechanisms involved in inhalation toxicity of nanomaterials and provide a strategy for the development of alternative test methods for hazard and risk assessment of nanomaterials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7249325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72493252020-06-04 Adverse outcome pathways as a tool for the design of testing strategies to support the safety assessment of emerging advanced materials at the nanoscale Halappanavar, Sabina van den Brule, Sybille Nymark, Penny Gaté, Laurent Seidel, Carole Valentino, Sarah Zhernovkov, Vadim Høgh Danielsen, Pernille De Vizcaya, Andrea Wolff, Henrik Stöger, Tobias Boyadziev, Andrey Poulsen, Sarah Søs Sørli, Jorid Birkelund Vogel, Ulla Part Fibre Toxicol Review Toxicity testing and regulation of advanced materials at the nanoscale, i.e. nanosafety, is challenged by the growing number of nanomaterials and their property variants requiring assessment for potential human health impacts. The existing animal-reliant toxicity testing tools are onerous in terms of time and resources and are less and less in line with the international effort to reduce animal experiments. Thus, there is a need for faster, cheaper, sensitive and effective animal alternatives that are supported by mechanistic evidence. More importantly, there is an urgency for developing alternative testing strategies that help justify the strategic prioritization of testing or targeting the most apparent adverse outcomes, selection of specific endpoints and assays and identifying nanomaterials of high concern. The Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework is a systematic process that uses the available mechanistic information concerning a toxicological response and describes causal or mechanistic linkages between a molecular initiating event, a series of intermediate key events and the adverse outcome. The AOP framework provides pragmatic insights to promote the development of alternative testing strategies. This review will detail a brief overview of the AOP framework and its application to nanotoxicology, tools for developing AOPs and the role of toxicogenomics, and summarize various AOPs of relevance to inhalation toxicity of nanomaterials that are currently under various stages of development. The review also presents a network of AOPs derived from connecting all AOPs, which shows that several adverse outcomes induced by nanomaterials originate from a molecular initiating event that describes the interaction of nanomaterials with lung cells and involve similar intermediate key events. Finally, using the example of an established AOP for lung fibrosis, the review will discuss various in vitro tests available for assessing lung fibrosis and how the information can be used to support a tiered testing strategy for lung fibrosis. The AOPs and AOP network enable deeper understanding of mechanisms involved in inhalation toxicity of nanomaterials and provide a strategy for the development of alternative test methods for hazard and risk assessment of nanomaterials. BioMed Central 2020-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7249325/ /pubmed/32450889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12989-020-00344-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Halappanavar, Sabina
van den Brule, Sybille
Nymark, Penny
Gaté, Laurent
Seidel, Carole
Valentino, Sarah
Zhernovkov, Vadim
Høgh Danielsen, Pernille
De Vizcaya, Andrea
Wolff, Henrik
Stöger, Tobias
Boyadziev, Andrey
Poulsen, Sarah Søs
Sørli, Jorid Birkelund
Vogel, Ulla
Adverse outcome pathways as a tool for the design of testing strategies to support the safety assessment of emerging advanced materials at the nanoscale
title Adverse outcome pathways as a tool for the design of testing strategies to support the safety assessment of emerging advanced materials at the nanoscale
title_full Adverse outcome pathways as a tool for the design of testing strategies to support the safety assessment of emerging advanced materials at the nanoscale
title_fullStr Adverse outcome pathways as a tool for the design of testing strategies to support the safety assessment of emerging advanced materials at the nanoscale
title_full_unstemmed Adverse outcome pathways as a tool for the design of testing strategies to support the safety assessment of emerging advanced materials at the nanoscale
title_short Adverse outcome pathways as a tool for the design of testing strategies to support the safety assessment of emerging advanced materials at the nanoscale
title_sort adverse outcome pathways as a tool for the design of testing strategies to support the safety assessment of emerging advanced materials at the nanoscale
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32450889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12989-020-00344-4
work_keys_str_mv AT halappanavarsabina adverseoutcomepathwaysasatoolforthedesignoftestingstrategiestosupportthesafetyassessmentofemergingadvancedmaterialsatthenanoscale
AT vandenbrulesybille adverseoutcomepathwaysasatoolforthedesignoftestingstrategiestosupportthesafetyassessmentofemergingadvancedmaterialsatthenanoscale
AT nymarkpenny adverseoutcomepathwaysasatoolforthedesignoftestingstrategiestosupportthesafetyassessmentofemergingadvancedmaterialsatthenanoscale
AT gatelaurent adverseoutcomepathwaysasatoolforthedesignoftestingstrategiestosupportthesafetyassessmentofemergingadvancedmaterialsatthenanoscale
AT seidelcarole adverseoutcomepathwaysasatoolforthedesignoftestingstrategiestosupportthesafetyassessmentofemergingadvancedmaterialsatthenanoscale
AT valentinosarah adverseoutcomepathwaysasatoolforthedesignoftestingstrategiestosupportthesafetyassessmentofemergingadvancedmaterialsatthenanoscale
AT zhernovkovvadim adverseoutcomepathwaysasatoolforthedesignoftestingstrategiestosupportthesafetyassessmentofemergingadvancedmaterialsatthenanoscale
AT høghdanielsenpernille adverseoutcomepathwaysasatoolforthedesignoftestingstrategiestosupportthesafetyassessmentofemergingadvancedmaterialsatthenanoscale
AT devizcayaandrea adverseoutcomepathwaysasatoolforthedesignoftestingstrategiestosupportthesafetyassessmentofemergingadvancedmaterialsatthenanoscale
AT wolffhenrik adverseoutcomepathwaysasatoolforthedesignoftestingstrategiestosupportthesafetyassessmentofemergingadvancedmaterialsatthenanoscale
AT stogertobias adverseoutcomepathwaysasatoolforthedesignoftestingstrategiestosupportthesafetyassessmentofemergingadvancedmaterialsatthenanoscale
AT boyadzievandrey adverseoutcomepathwaysasatoolforthedesignoftestingstrategiestosupportthesafetyassessmentofemergingadvancedmaterialsatthenanoscale
AT poulsensarahsøs adverseoutcomepathwaysasatoolforthedesignoftestingstrategiestosupportthesafetyassessmentofemergingadvancedmaterialsatthenanoscale
AT sørlijoridbirkelund adverseoutcomepathwaysasatoolforthedesignoftestingstrategiestosupportthesafetyassessmentofemergingadvancedmaterialsatthenanoscale
AT vogelulla adverseoutcomepathwaysasatoolforthedesignoftestingstrategiestosupportthesafetyassessmentofemergingadvancedmaterialsatthenanoscale