Cargando…
Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care devices for detection of anemia in community settings in India
BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis of anemia by community workers using a point-of-care device is a challenge. The objective of the study was to establish the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care devices for detecting anemia in community settings. METHODS: It was diagnostic accuracy study with cross-sec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32456639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05329-9 |
_version_ | 1783538575499853824 |
---|---|
author | Neogi, Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Sharma, Jyoti Pandey, Shivam Zaidi, Nausheen Bhattacharya, Maitreyee Kar, Rakhee Kar, Sitanshu Sekhar Purohit, Abhishek Bandyopadhyay, Sanjib Saxena, Renu |
author_facet | Neogi, Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Sharma, Jyoti Pandey, Shivam Zaidi, Nausheen Bhattacharya, Maitreyee Kar, Rakhee Kar, Sitanshu Sekhar Purohit, Abhishek Bandyopadhyay, Sanjib Saxena, Renu |
author_sort | Neogi, Sutapa Bandyopadhyay |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis of anemia by community workers using a point-of-care device is a challenge. The objective of the study was to establish the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care devices for detecting anemia in community settings. METHODS: It was diagnostic accuracy study with cross-sectional design on adult patients attending the outpatient department of rural/ urban health centres of Medical colleges from India. The index tests were HemoCue, TrueHb, Massimo’s device and spectroscopic device, compared against autoanalyzer (gold standard). Accuracy was expressed by sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, predictive values, area under the curve (AUC) and levels of agreement. For the diagnostic accuracy component, 1407 participants were recruited with a minimum of 600 for each device. An additional 200 participants were considered to elucidate the performance of devices in different weather conditions. RESULTS: HemoCue and TrueHb performed better than Massimo and spectroscopic devices. Detection of anemia by technicians was similar between TrueHb and HemoCue (AUC 0.92 v/s 0.90, p > 0.05). Community workers performed better with Hemocue for detecting anemia compared to TrueHb (AUC 0.92 v/s 0.90, p < 0.05). For detection of severe anemia, accuracy of TrueHb was significantly better with technicians (AUC 0.91 v/s 0.70; p < 0.05) and community workers (AUC 0.91 v/s 0.73; p < 0.05). HemoCue showed a bias or mean difference (95%CI) of 0.47 g/dl (0.42, 0.52) for all values, and 0.92 g/dl (0.82, 1.03) for severe anemia. For TrueHb, it was − 0.28 g/dl (− 0.37, − 0.20) for all readings, and 0.06 g/dl (− 0.52, 0.63) for severe anemia. TrueHb appeared to be more consistent across different weather conditions, although it overestimated Hb in extreme cold weather conditions. CONCLUSION: For detection of anemia, True Hb and HemoCue were comparable. For severe anemia, True Hb seemed to be a better and feasible point-of-care device for detecting anemia in the community settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7249358 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72493582020-06-04 Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care devices for detection of anemia in community settings in India Neogi, Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Sharma, Jyoti Pandey, Shivam Zaidi, Nausheen Bhattacharya, Maitreyee Kar, Rakhee Kar, Sitanshu Sekhar Purohit, Abhishek Bandyopadhyay, Sanjib Saxena, Renu BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis of anemia by community workers using a point-of-care device is a challenge. The objective of the study was to establish the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care devices for detecting anemia in community settings. METHODS: It was diagnostic accuracy study with cross-sectional design on adult patients attending the outpatient department of rural/ urban health centres of Medical colleges from India. The index tests were HemoCue, TrueHb, Massimo’s device and spectroscopic device, compared against autoanalyzer (gold standard). Accuracy was expressed by sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, predictive values, area under the curve (AUC) and levels of agreement. For the diagnostic accuracy component, 1407 participants were recruited with a minimum of 600 for each device. An additional 200 participants were considered to elucidate the performance of devices in different weather conditions. RESULTS: HemoCue and TrueHb performed better than Massimo and spectroscopic devices. Detection of anemia by technicians was similar between TrueHb and HemoCue (AUC 0.92 v/s 0.90, p > 0.05). Community workers performed better with Hemocue for detecting anemia compared to TrueHb (AUC 0.92 v/s 0.90, p < 0.05). For detection of severe anemia, accuracy of TrueHb was significantly better with technicians (AUC 0.91 v/s 0.70; p < 0.05) and community workers (AUC 0.91 v/s 0.73; p < 0.05). HemoCue showed a bias or mean difference (95%CI) of 0.47 g/dl (0.42, 0.52) for all values, and 0.92 g/dl (0.82, 1.03) for severe anemia. For TrueHb, it was − 0.28 g/dl (− 0.37, − 0.20) for all readings, and 0.06 g/dl (− 0.52, 0.63) for severe anemia. TrueHb appeared to be more consistent across different weather conditions, although it overestimated Hb in extreme cold weather conditions. CONCLUSION: For detection of anemia, True Hb and HemoCue were comparable. For severe anemia, True Hb seemed to be a better and feasible point-of-care device for detecting anemia in the community settings. BioMed Central 2020-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7249358/ /pubmed/32456639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05329-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Neogi, Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Sharma, Jyoti Pandey, Shivam Zaidi, Nausheen Bhattacharya, Maitreyee Kar, Rakhee Kar, Sitanshu Sekhar Purohit, Abhishek Bandyopadhyay, Sanjib Saxena, Renu Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care devices for detection of anemia in community settings in India |
title | Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care devices for detection of anemia in community settings in India |
title_full | Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care devices for detection of anemia in community settings in India |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care devices for detection of anemia in community settings in India |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care devices for detection of anemia in community settings in India |
title_short | Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care devices for detection of anemia in community settings in India |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care devices for detection of anemia in community settings in india |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32456639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05329-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT neogisutapabandyopadhyay diagnosticaccuracyofpointofcaredevicesfordetectionofanemiaincommunitysettingsinindia AT sharmajyoti diagnosticaccuracyofpointofcaredevicesfordetectionofanemiaincommunitysettingsinindia AT pandeyshivam diagnosticaccuracyofpointofcaredevicesfordetectionofanemiaincommunitysettingsinindia AT zaidinausheen diagnosticaccuracyofpointofcaredevicesfordetectionofanemiaincommunitysettingsinindia AT bhattacharyamaitreyee diagnosticaccuracyofpointofcaredevicesfordetectionofanemiaincommunitysettingsinindia AT karrakhee diagnosticaccuracyofpointofcaredevicesfordetectionofanemiaincommunitysettingsinindia AT karsitanshusekhar diagnosticaccuracyofpointofcaredevicesfordetectionofanemiaincommunitysettingsinindia AT purohitabhishek diagnosticaccuracyofpointofcaredevicesfordetectionofanemiaincommunitysettingsinindia AT bandyopadhyaysanjib diagnosticaccuracyofpointofcaredevicesfordetectionofanemiaincommunitysettingsinindia AT saxenarenu diagnosticaccuracyofpointofcaredevicesfordetectionofanemiaincommunitysettingsinindia |