Cargando…

Management of anal cancer patients – a pattern of care analysis in German-speaking countries

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy dose and target volume prescriptions for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) vary considerably in daily practice and guidelines, including those from NCCN, UK, Australasian, and ESMO. We conducted a pattern-of-care survey to assess the patient management in German speaking c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin, Daniel, von der Grün, Jens, Rödel, Claus, Fokas, Emmanouil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32450863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01539-x
_version_ 1783538582499098624
author Martin, Daniel
von der Grün, Jens
Rödel, Claus
Fokas, Emmanouil
author_facet Martin, Daniel
von der Grün, Jens
Rödel, Claus
Fokas, Emmanouil
author_sort Martin, Daniel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy dose and target volume prescriptions for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) vary considerably in daily practice and guidelines, including those from NCCN, UK, Australasian, and ESMO. We conducted a pattern-of-care survey to assess the patient management in German speaking countries. METHODS: We developed an anonymous questionnaire comprising 18 questions on diagnosis and treatment of ASCC. The survey was sent to 361 DEGRO-associated institutions, including 41 university hospitals, 118 non-university institutions, and 202 private practices. RESULTS: We received a total of 101 (28%) surveys, including 20 (19.8%) from university, 36 (35.6%) from non-university clinics, and 45 (44.6%) from private practices. A total of 28 (27.8%) institutions reported to treat more than 5 patients with early-stage ASCC and 42 (41.6%) institutions treat more than 5 patients with locoregionally-advanced ASCC per year. Biopsy of suspicious inguinal nodes was advocated in only 12 (11.8%) centers. Screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is done in 28 (27.7%). Intensity modulated radiotherapy or similar techniques are used in 97%. The elective lymph node dose ranged from 30.6 Gy to 52.8 Gy, whereas 87% prescribed 50.4–55. 8 Gy (range: 30.6 to 59.4 Gy) to the involved lymph nodes. The dose to gross disease of cT1 or cT2 ASCC ranged from 50 to ≥60 Gy. For cT3 or cT4 tumors the target dose ranged from 54 Gy to more than 60 Gy, with 76 (75.2%) institutions prescribing 59.4 Gy. The preferred concurrent chemotherapy regimen was 5-FU/Mitomycin C, whereas 6 (6%) prescribed Capecitabine/Mitomycin C. HIV-positive patients are treated with full-dose CRT in 87 (86.1%) institutions. First assessment for clinical response is reported to be performed at 4–6 weeks after completion of CRT in 2 (2%) institutions, at 6–8 weeks in 20 (19.8%), and 79 (78%) institutions wait up to 5 months. CONCLUSIONS: We observed marked differences in radiotherapy doses and treatment technique in patients with ASCC, and also variable approaches for patients with HIV. These data underline the need for an consensus treatment guideline for ASCC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7249388
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72493882020-06-04 Management of anal cancer patients – a pattern of care analysis in German-speaking countries Martin, Daniel von der Grün, Jens Rödel, Claus Fokas, Emmanouil Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy dose and target volume prescriptions for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) vary considerably in daily practice and guidelines, including those from NCCN, UK, Australasian, and ESMO. We conducted a pattern-of-care survey to assess the patient management in German speaking countries. METHODS: We developed an anonymous questionnaire comprising 18 questions on diagnosis and treatment of ASCC. The survey was sent to 361 DEGRO-associated institutions, including 41 university hospitals, 118 non-university institutions, and 202 private practices. RESULTS: We received a total of 101 (28%) surveys, including 20 (19.8%) from university, 36 (35.6%) from non-university clinics, and 45 (44.6%) from private practices. A total of 28 (27.8%) institutions reported to treat more than 5 patients with early-stage ASCC and 42 (41.6%) institutions treat more than 5 patients with locoregionally-advanced ASCC per year. Biopsy of suspicious inguinal nodes was advocated in only 12 (11.8%) centers. Screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is done in 28 (27.7%). Intensity modulated radiotherapy or similar techniques are used in 97%. The elective lymph node dose ranged from 30.6 Gy to 52.8 Gy, whereas 87% prescribed 50.4–55. 8 Gy (range: 30.6 to 59.4 Gy) to the involved lymph nodes. The dose to gross disease of cT1 or cT2 ASCC ranged from 50 to ≥60 Gy. For cT3 or cT4 tumors the target dose ranged from 54 Gy to more than 60 Gy, with 76 (75.2%) institutions prescribing 59.4 Gy. The preferred concurrent chemotherapy regimen was 5-FU/Mitomycin C, whereas 6 (6%) prescribed Capecitabine/Mitomycin C. HIV-positive patients are treated with full-dose CRT in 87 (86.1%) institutions. First assessment for clinical response is reported to be performed at 4–6 weeks after completion of CRT in 2 (2%) institutions, at 6–8 weeks in 20 (19.8%), and 79 (78%) institutions wait up to 5 months. CONCLUSIONS: We observed marked differences in radiotherapy doses and treatment technique in patients with ASCC, and also variable approaches for patients with HIV. These data underline the need for an consensus treatment guideline for ASCC. BioMed Central 2020-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7249388/ /pubmed/32450863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01539-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Martin, Daniel
von der Grün, Jens
Rödel, Claus
Fokas, Emmanouil
Management of anal cancer patients – a pattern of care analysis in German-speaking countries
title Management of anal cancer patients – a pattern of care analysis in German-speaking countries
title_full Management of anal cancer patients – a pattern of care analysis in German-speaking countries
title_fullStr Management of anal cancer patients – a pattern of care analysis in German-speaking countries
title_full_unstemmed Management of anal cancer patients – a pattern of care analysis in German-speaking countries
title_short Management of anal cancer patients – a pattern of care analysis in German-speaking countries
title_sort management of anal cancer patients – a pattern of care analysis in german-speaking countries
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32450863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01539-x
work_keys_str_mv AT martindaniel managementofanalcancerpatientsapatternofcareanalysisingermanspeakingcountries
AT vondergrunjens managementofanalcancerpatientsapatternofcareanalysisingermanspeakingcountries
AT rodelclaus managementofanalcancerpatientsapatternofcareanalysisingermanspeakingcountries
AT fokasemmanouil managementofanalcancerpatientsapatternofcareanalysisingermanspeakingcountries