Cargando…

Change in Norwegian consumer attitudes towards piglet castration: increased emphasis on animal welfare

BACKGROUND: Male piglets are surgically castrated at a young age primarily to prevent pork meat from being tainted with boar taint, an offensive taste and odor that can be present in uncastrated male pigs. The practice of surgical castration is considered to be both stressful and painful for the pig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sødring, Marianne, Nafstad, Ola, Håseth, Torunn Thauland
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32456651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-020-00522-6
_version_ 1783538588850323456
author Sødring, Marianne
Nafstad, Ola
Håseth, Torunn Thauland
author_facet Sødring, Marianne
Nafstad, Ola
Håseth, Torunn Thauland
author_sort Sødring, Marianne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Male piglets are surgically castrated at a young age primarily to prevent pork meat from being tainted with boar taint, an offensive taste and odor that can be present in uncastrated male pigs. The practice of surgical castration is considered to be both stressful and painful for the piglets, and is therefore under scrutiny due to animal welfare concerns. Rearing of intact males or vaccination against boar taint (immunocastration) are two potential alternatives to surgical castration, but in order to successfully implement either of these alternatives, consumer acceptance of the different methods must be taken into consideration as it will be central for future sales of pork products. A consumer survey mapping Norwegian consumers’ attitudes toward piglet castration was conducted to explore whether the consumers’ position regarding castration has changed since an almost identical study was completed in 2008. RESULTS: The internet-based survey found that Norwegian consumers are comfortable with the current practice of surgical castration with anesthesia, but also that they are open to the alternative method of vaccination against boar taint. When provided additional information stating that vaccination against boar taint may not be able to reduce boar taint to the levels that castration with anesthesia does, consumer skepticism towards vaccination increased. When evaluating castration methods, animal welfare was the most important influencing factor. Since the original survey from 2008, animal welfare was also the single factor that has increased the most among a set of assessment criteria when purchasing pork products. CONCLUSION: Norwegian consumers regard animal welfare as an important factor both when purchasing pork products and when evaluating different methods of castration, and animal welfare as a factor has increased in importance since the initial survey in 2008. Although the current practice of castration using local anesthesia is still widely accepted among consumers, the acceptance of today’s method has declined since the original survey in 2008.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7249416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72494162020-06-04 Change in Norwegian consumer attitudes towards piglet castration: increased emphasis on animal welfare Sødring, Marianne Nafstad, Ola Håseth, Torunn Thauland Acta Vet Scand Research BACKGROUND: Male piglets are surgically castrated at a young age primarily to prevent pork meat from being tainted with boar taint, an offensive taste and odor that can be present in uncastrated male pigs. The practice of surgical castration is considered to be both stressful and painful for the piglets, and is therefore under scrutiny due to animal welfare concerns. Rearing of intact males or vaccination against boar taint (immunocastration) are two potential alternatives to surgical castration, but in order to successfully implement either of these alternatives, consumer acceptance of the different methods must be taken into consideration as it will be central for future sales of pork products. A consumer survey mapping Norwegian consumers’ attitudes toward piglet castration was conducted to explore whether the consumers’ position regarding castration has changed since an almost identical study was completed in 2008. RESULTS: The internet-based survey found that Norwegian consumers are comfortable with the current practice of surgical castration with anesthesia, but also that they are open to the alternative method of vaccination against boar taint. When provided additional information stating that vaccination against boar taint may not be able to reduce boar taint to the levels that castration with anesthesia does, consumer skepticism towards vaccination increased. When evaluating castration methods, animal welfare was the most important influencing factor. Since the original survey from 2008, animal welfare was also the single factor that has increased the most among a set of assessment criteria when purchasing pork products. CONCLUSION: Norwegian consumers regard animal welfare as an important factor both when purchasing pork products and when evaluating different methods of castration, and animal welfare as a factor has increased in importance since the initial survey in 2008. Although the current practice of castration using local anesthesia is still widely accepted among consumers, the acceptance of today’s method has declined since the original survey in 2008. BioMed Central 2020-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7249416/ /pubmed/32456651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-020-00522-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Sødring, Marianne
Nafstad, Ola
Håseth, Torunn Thauland
Change in Norwegian consumer attitudes towards piglet castration: increased emphasis on animal welfare
title Change in Norwegian consumer attitudes towards piglet castration: increased emphasis on animal welfare
title_full Change in Norwegian consumer attitudes towards piglet castration: increased emphasis on animal welfare
title_fullStr Change in Norwegian consumer attitudes towards piglet castration: increased emphasis on animal welfare
title_full_unstemmed Change in Norwegian consumer attitudes towards piglet castration: increased emphasis on animal welfare
title_short Change in Norwegian consumer attitudes towards piglet castration: increased emphasis on animal welfare
title_sort change in norwegian consumer attitudes towards piglet castration: increased emphasis on animal welfare
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32456651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-020-00522-6
work_keys_str_mv AT sødringmarianne changeinnorwegianconsumerattitudestowardspigletcastrationincreasedemphasisonanimalwelfare
AT nafstadola changeinnorwegianconsumerattitudestowardspigletcastrationincreasedemphasisonanimalwelfare
AT hasethtorunnthauland changeinnorwegianconsumerattitudestowardspigletcastrationincreasedemphasisonanimalwelfare