Cargando…

Endovascular approach for acute limb ischemia without thrombolytic therapy

BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy for acute lower limb ischemia (ALLI) has developed and demonstrated safety and efficacy. The purpose of this study was to assess clinical outcomes in patients treated for ALLI with conventional endovascular or surgical revascularization. METHOD: This study was a retr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fukuda, Keisuke, Yokoi, Yoshiaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32438865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753944720924575
_version_ 1783538607369224192
author Fukuda, Keisuke
Yokoi, Yoshiaki
author_facet Fukuda, Keisuke
Yokoi, Yoshiaki
author_sort Fukuda, Keisuke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy for acute lower limb ischemia (ALLI) has developed and demonstrated safety and efficacy. The purpose of this study was to assess clinical outcomes in patients treated for ALLI with conventional endovascular or surgical revascularization. METHOD: This study was a retrospective single-center review. Consecutive patients with ALLI treated with conventional endovascular revascularization (ER) without thrombolytic agent or surgical revascularization (SR) between 2008 and 2014 were investigated. The 1 year and 3 year amputation rate and mortality rate were assessed by time-to-event methods, including Kaplan–Meier estimation. RESULT: A total of 64 limbs in 62 patients with ALLI due to thromboembolism or thrombosis of a native artery, bypass graft, or previous stented vessel were included. The majority of limbs (90.9%) presented with Rutherford clinical categories 1 to 2 ischemia. Technical success rate was 95.5% in ER and 92.9% in SR group (p = 0.547). Overall amputation rates were 9.1% in ER versus 9.5% in SR after 1 year (p = 0.971) and 9.1% in ER versus 11.9% in SR after 3 year (p = 0.742). Overall mortality rates were 15% in ER versus 7.1% in SR after 1 year (p = 0.491) and 15% in ER versus 11.2% in SR after 3 year (p = 0.878). CONCLUSION: Endovascular or surgical revascularization of ALLI resulted in comparable outcomes in limb salvage and mortality rate at 1 year and 3 year. Conventional endovascular therapy without thrombolytic agent such as stenting, balloon angioplasty, or catheter-directed thrombosuction may be considered as a treatment option for ALLI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7249547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72495472020-06-15 Endovascular approach for acute limb ischemia without thrombolytic therapy Fukuda, Keisuke Yokoi, Yoshiaki Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy for acute lower limb ischemia (ALLI) has developed and demonstrated safety and efficacy. The purpose of this study was to assess clinical outcomes in patients treated for ALLI with conventional endovascular or surgical revascularization. METHOD: This study was a retrospective single-center review. Consecutive patients with ALLI treated with conventional endovascular revascularization (ER) without thrombolytic agent or surgical revascularization (SR) between 2008 and 2014 were investigated. The 1 year and 3 year amputation rate and mortality rate were assessed by time-to-event methods, including Kaplan–Meier estimation. RESULT: A total of 64 limbs in 62 patients with ALLI due to thromboembolism or thrombosis of a native artery, bypass graft, or previous stented vessel were included. The majority of limbs (90.9%) presented with Rutherford clinical categories 1 to 2 ischemia. Technical success rate was 95.5% in ER and 92.9% in SR group (p = 0.547). Overall amputation rates were 9.1% in ER versus 9.5% in SR after 1 year (p = 0.971) and 9.1% in ER versus 11.9% in SR after 3 year (p = 0.742). Overall mortality rates were 15% in ER versus 7.1% in SR after 1 year (p = 0.491) and 15% in ER versus 11.2% in SR after 3 year (p = 0.878). CONCLUSION: Endovascular or surgical revascularization of ALLI resulted in comparable outcomes in limb salvage and mortality rate at 1 year and 3 year. Conventional endovascular therapy without thrombolytic agent such as stenting, balloon angioplasty, or catheter-directed thrombosuction may be considered as a treatment option for ALLI. SAGE Publications 2020-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7249547/ /pubmed/32438865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753944720924575 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Fukuda, Keisuke
Yokoi, Yoshiaki
Endovascular approach for acute limb ischemia without thrombolytic therapy
title Endovascular approach for acute limb ischemia without thrombolytic therapy
title_full Endovascular approach for acute limb ischemia without thrombolytic therapy
title_fullStr Endovascular approach for acute limb ischemia without thrombolytic therapy
title_full_unstemmed Endovascular approach for acute limb ischemia without thrombolytic therapy
title_short Endovascular approach for acute limb ischemia without thrombolytic therapy
title_sort endovascular approach for acute limb ischemia without thrombolytic therapy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32438865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753944720924575
work_keys_str_mv AT fukudakeisuke endovascularapproachforacutelimbischemiawithoutthrombolytictherapy
AT yokoiyoshiaki endovascularapproachforacutelimbischemiawithoutthrombolytictherapy