Cargando…

Antithrombotic and hemostatic stewardship: evaluation of clinical outcomes and adverse events of recombinant factor VIIa (Novoseven(®)) utilization at a large academic medical center

BACKGROUND: Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) (Novoseven®) is utilized for the reversal of anticoagulation-associated bleeding and refractory bleeding in cardiac surgery. In August 2015, rFVIIa was transferred from the blood bank to the pharmacy at New York University (NYU) Langone Health. Concordant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marsh, Kassandra, Green, David, Raco, Veronica, Papadopoulos, John, Ahuja, Tania
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32449469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753944720924255
_version_ 1783538609712791552
author Marsh, Kassandra
Green, David
Raco, Veronica
Papadopoulos, John
Ahuja, Tania
author_facet Marsh, Kassandra
Green, David
Raco, Veronica
Papadopoulos, John
Ahuja, Tania
author_sort Marsh, Kassandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) (Novoseven®) is utilized for the reversal of anticoagulation-associated bleeding and refractory bleeding in cardiac surgery. In August 2015, rFVIIa was transferred from the blood bank to the pharmacy at New York University (NYU) Langone Health. Concordantly, an off-label dosing guideline was developed. The objective of this study was to describe utilization and cost of rFVIIa and assess compliance to our dosing guideline. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, observational review of rFVIIa administrations post-implementation of an off-label dosing guideline. All patients who received rFVIIa between September 2015 and June 2017 were evaluated. For each rFVIIa administration, anticoagulation and laboratory values, indications for use, dosing, ordering and administration times, concomitant blood products, and adverse events were collected. Adverse events included venous thromboembolism, stroke, myocardial infarction, and death due to systemic embolism and mortality. The primary endpoint was the utilization of rFVIIa in accordance with the off-label dosing guideline. Secondary endpoints included hemostatic efficacy of rFVIIa, adverse events, blood products administered, and cost-effectiveness of rFVIIa transition to pharmacy. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients [pediatric (n = 6), adult (n = 57)] received rFVIIa, with the majority of use for refractory bleeding after cardiac surgery. The utilization of rVIIa decreased after development of the off-label dosing guideline and transition from blood bank to pharmacy. The total incidence of thromboembolic events within 30 days was 19.6%; 17.6% arterial and 2% venous; 70% of patients with an adverse event were over 70 years of age. Use of rFVIIa reduced the median number of units of blood products administered. CONCLUSION: Administration of rFVIIa for cardiac surgery appears to be effective for hemostasis. Transitioning rFVIIa from the blood bank to pharmacy and implementation of a dosing guideline appears to have reduced utilization. Patients receiving rFVIIa should be monitored for thromboembolic events. Elderly patients may be at higher risk for thromboembolic events.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7249557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72495572020-06-15 Antithrombotic and hemostatic stewardship: evaluation of clinical outcomes and adverse events of recombinant factor VIIa (Novoseven(®)) utilization at a large academic medical center Marsh, Kassandra Green, David Raco, Veronica Papadopoulos, John Ahuja, Tania Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) (Novoseven®) is utilized for the reversal of anticoagulation-associated bleeding and refractory bleeding in cardiac surgery. In August 2015, rFVIIa was transferred from the blood bank to the pharmacy at New York University (NYU) Langone Health. Concordantly, an off-label dosing guideline was developed. The objective of this study was to describe utilization and cost of rFVIIa and assess compliance to our dosing guideline. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, observational review of rFVIIa administrations post-implementation of an off-label dosing guideline. All patients who received rFVIIa between September 2015 and June 2017 were evaluated. For each rFVIIa administration, anticoagulation and laboratory values, indications for use, dosing, ordering and administration times, concomitant blood products, and adverse events were collected. Adverse events included venous thromboembolism, stroke, myocardial infarction, and death due to systemic embolism and mortality. The primary endpoint was the utilization of rFVIIa in accordance with the off-label dosing guideline. Secondary endpoints included hemostatic efficacy of rFVIIa, adverse events, blood products administered, and cost-effectiveness of rFVIIa transition to pharmacy. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients [pediatric (n = 6), adult (n = 57)] received rFVIIa, with the majority of use for refractory bleeding after cardiac surgery. The utilization of rVIIa decreased after development of the off-label dosing guideline and transition from blood bank to pharmacy. The total incidence of thromboembolic events within 30 days was 19.6%; 17.6% arterial and 2% venous; 70% of patients with an adverse event were over 70 years of age. Use of rFVIIa reduced the median number of units of blood products administered. CONCLUSION: Administration of rFVIIa for cardiac surgery appears to be effective for hemostasis. Transitioning rFVIIa from the blood bank to pharmacy and implementation of a dosing guideline appears to have reduced utilization. Patients receiving rFVIIa should be monitored for thromboembolic events. Elderly patients may be at higher risk for thromboembolic events. SAGE Publications 2020-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7249557/ /pubmed/32449469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753944720924255 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Marsh, Kassandra
Green, David
Raco, Veronica
Papadopoulos, John
Ahuja, Tania
Antithrombotic and hemostatic stewardship: evaluation of clinical outcomes and adverse events of recombinant factor VIIa (Novoseven(®)) utilization at a large academic medical center
title Antithrombotic and hemostatic stewardship: evaluation of clinical outcomes and adverse events of recombinant factor VIIa (Novoseven(®)) utilization at a large academic medical center
title_full Antithrombotic and hemostatic stewardship: evaluation of clinical outcomes and adverse events of recombinant factor VIIa (Novoseven(®)) utilization at a large academic medical center
title_fullStr Antithrombotic and hemostatic stewardship: evaluation of clinical outcomes and adverse events of recombinant factor VIIa (Novoseven(®)) utilization at a large academic medical center
title_full_unstemmed Antithrombotic and hemostatic stewardship: evaluation of clinical outcomes and adverse events of recombinant factor VIIa (Novoseven(®)) utilization at a large academic medical center
title_short Antithrombotic and hemostatic stewardship: evaluation of clinical outcomes and adverse events of recombinant factor VIIa (Novoseven(®)) utilization at a large academic medical center
title_sort antithrombotic and hemostatic stewardship: evaluation of clinical outcomes and adverse events of recombinant factor viia (novoseven(®)) utilization at a large academic medical center
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32449469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753944720924255
work_keys_str_mv AT marshkassandra antithromboticandhemostaticstewardshipevaluationofclinicaloutcomesandadverseeventsofrecombinantfactorviianovosevenutilizationatalargeacademicmedicalcenter
AT greendavid antithromboticandhemostaticstewardshipevaluationofclinicaloutcomesandadverseeventsofrecombinantfactorviianovosevenutilizationatalargeacademicmedicalcenter
AT racoveronica antithromboticandhemostaticstewardshipevaluationofclinicaloutcomesandadverseeventsofrecombinantfactorviianovosevenutilizationatalargeacademicmedicalcenter
AT papadopoulosjohn antithromboticandhemostaticstewardshipevaluationofclinicaloutcomesandadverseeventsofrecombinantfactorviianovosevenutilizationatalargeacademicmedicalcenter
AT ahujatania antithromboticandhemostaticstewardshipevaluationofclinicaloutcomesandadverseeventsofrecombinantfactorviianovosevenutilizationatalargeacademicmedicalcenter