Cargando…

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Optimise Participation in Stroke Rehabilitation – A Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND: Fatigue and attentional decline limit the duration of many therapy sessions in older adults poststroke. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may facilitate participation in rehabilitation, potentially via reduced fatigue and improved sustained attention poststroke. OBJECTIVE: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Etherton-Beer, Christopher, Lui, Yee, Radalj, Miranda, Vallence, Ann-Maree, Singer, Barby
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32548581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2633105520922181
_version_ 1783538611142000640
author Etherton-Beer, Christopher
Lui, Yee
Radalj, Miranda
Vallence, Ann-Maree
Singer, Barby
author_facet Etherton-Beer, Christopher
Lui, Yee
Radalj, Miranda
Vallence, Ann-Maree
Singer, Barby
author_sort Etherton-Beer, Christopher
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fatigue and attentional decline limit the duration of many therapy sessions in older adults poststroke. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may facilitate participation in rehabilitation, potentially via reduced fatigue and improved sustained attention poststroke. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether tDCS results in an increase in the number of completed rehabilitation therapy sessions in stroke survivors. METHODS: Nineteen participants were randomly allocated to receive 10 sessions of 2-mA anodal (excitatory) tDCS, or sham tDCS, applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for 20 minutes within 1 hour prior to the first rehabilitation therapy session of the day. After a 2-day washout period, participants then crossed-over. Researchers applying the tDCS, and those recording measures were blinded to group allocation. The number of first rehabilitation therapy sessions completed as planned, as well as the total duration of rehabilitation therapy, were used to determine the influence of tDCS on participation in stroke rehabilitation. RESULTS: The total number of first therapy sessions completed as planned did not vary according to group allocation (111 of 139 sessions for tDCS, 110 of 147 sessions for sham treatment; chi-square 1.0; P = .31). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that, while tDCS to the DLPFC was well tolerated, it did not significantly influence the number of completed rehabilitation therapy sessions in stroke survivors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7249564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72495642020-06-15 Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Optimise Participation in Stroke Rehabilitation – A Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Feasibility Study Etherton-Beer, Christopher Lui, Yee Radalj, Miranda Vallence, Ann-Maree Singer, Barby Neurosci Insights Brief Report BACKGROUND: Fatigue and attentional decline limit the duration of many therapy sessions in older adults poststroke. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may facilitate participation in rehabilitation, potentially via reduced fatigue and improved sustained attention poststroke. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether tDCS results in an increase in the number of completed rehabilitation therapy sessions in stroke survivors. METHODS: Nineteen participants were randomly allocated to receive 10 sessions of 2-mA anodal (excitatory) tDCS, or sham tDCS, applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for 20 minutes within 1 hour prior to the first rehabilitation therapy session of the day. After a 2-day washout period, participants then crossed-over. Researchers applying the tDCS, and those recording measures were blinded to group allocation. The number of first rehabilitation therapy sessions completed as planned, as well as the total duration of rehabilitation therapy, were used to determine the influence of tDCS on participation in stroke rehabilitation. RESULTS: The total number of first therapy sessions completed as planned did not vary according to group allocation (111 of 139 sessions for tDCS, 110 of 147 sessions for sham treatment; chi-square 1.0; P = .31). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that, while tDCS to the DLPFC was well tolerated, it did not significantly influence the number of completed rehabilitation therapy sessions in stroke survivors. SAGE Publications 2020-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7249564/ /pubmed/32548581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2633105520922181 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Brief Report
Etherton-Beer, Christopher
Lui, Yee
Radalj, Miranda
Vallence, Ann-Maree
Singer, Barby
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Optimise Participation in Stroke Rehabilitation – A Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Feasibility Study
title Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Optimise Participation in Stroke Rehabilitation – A Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Feasibility Study
title_full Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Optimise Participation in Stroke Rehabilitation – A Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Feasibility Study
title_fullStr Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Optimise Participation in Stroke Rehabilitation – A Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Feasibility Study
title_full_unstemmed Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Optimise Participation in Stroke Rehabilitation – A Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Feasibility Study
title_short Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Optimise Participation in Stroke Rehabilitation – A Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Feasibility Study
title_sort transcranial direct current stimulation to optimise participation in stroke rehabilitation – a sham-controlled cross-over feasibility study
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32548581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2633105520922181
work_keys_str_mv AT ethertonbeerchristopher transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationtooptimiseparticipationinstrokerehabilitationashamcontrolledcrossoverfeasibilitystudy
AT luiyee transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationtooptimiseparticipationinstrokerehabilitationashamcontrolledcrossoverfeasibilitystudy
AT radaljmiranda transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationtooptimiseparticipationinstrokerehabilitationashamcontrolledcrossoverfeasibilitystudy
AT vallenceannmaree transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationtooptimiseparticipationinstrokerehabilitationashamcontrolledcrossoverfeasibilitystudy
AT singerbarby transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationtooptimiseparticipationinstrokerehabilitationashamcontrolledcrossoverfeasibilitystudy