Cargando…
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Optimise Participation in Stroke Rehabilitation – A Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Feasibility Study
BACKGROUND: Fatigue and attentional decline limit the duration of many therapy sessions in older adults poststroke. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may facilitate participation in rehabilitation, potentially via reduced fatigue and improved sustained attention poststroke. OBJECTIVE: T...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32548581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2633105520922181 |
_version_ | 1783538611142000640 |
---|---|
author | Etherton-Beer, Christopher Lui, Yee Radalj, Miranda Vallence, Ann-Maree Singer, Barby |
author_facet | Etherton-Beer, Christopher Lui, Yee Radalj, Miranda Vallence, Ann-Maree Singer, Barby |
author_sort | Etherton-Beer, Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fatigue and attentional decline limit the duration of many therapy sessions in older adults poststroke. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may facilitate participation in rehabilitation, potentially via reduced fatigue and improved sustained attention poststroke. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether tDCS results in an increase in the number of completed rehabilitation therapy sessions in stroke survivors. METHODS: Nineteen participants were randomly allocated to receive 10 sessions of 2-mA anodal (excitatory) tDCS, or sham tDCS, applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for 20 minutes within 1 hour prior to the first rehabilitation therapy session of the day. After a 2-day washout period, participants then crossed-over. Researchers applying the tDCS, and those recording measures were blinded to group allocation. The number of first rehabilitation therapy sessions completed as planned, as well as the total duration of rehabilitation therapy, were used to determine the influence of tDCS on participation in stroke rehabilitation. RESULTS: The total number of first therapy sessions completed as planned did not vary according to group allocation (111 of 139 sessions for tDCS, 110 of 147 sessions for sham treatment; chi-square 1.0; P = .31). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that, while tDCS to the DLPFC was well tolerated, it did not significantly influence the number of completed rehabilitation therapy sessions in stroke survivors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7249564 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72495642020-06-15 Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Optimise Participation in Stroke Rehabilitation – A Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Feasibility Study Etherton-Beer, Christopher Lui, Yee Radalj, Miranda Vallence, Ann-Maree Singer, Barby Neurosci Insights Brief Report BACKGROUND: Fatigue and attentional decline limit the duration of many therapy sessions in older adults poststroke. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may facilitate participation in rehabilitation, potentially via reduced fatigue and improved sustained attention poststroke. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether tDCS results in an increase in the number of completed rehabilitation therapy sessions in stroke survivors. METHODS: Nineteen participants were randomly allocated to receive 10 sessions of 2-mA anodal (excitatory) tDCS, or sham tDCS, applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for 20 minutes within 1 hour prior to the first rehabilitation therapy session of the day. After a 2-day washout period, participants then crossed-over. Researchers applying the tDCS, and those recording measures were blinded to group allocation. The number of first rehabilitation therapy sessions completed as planned, as well as the total duration of rehabilitation therapy, were used to determine the influence of tDCS on participation in stroke rehabilitation. RESULTS: The total number of first therapy sessions completed as planned did not vary according to group allocation (111 of 139 sessions for tDCS, 110 of 147 sessions for sham treatment; chi-square 1.0; P = .31). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that, while tDCS to the DLPFC was well tolerated, it did not significantly influence the number of completed rehabilitation therapy sessions in stroke survivors. SAGE Publications 2020-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7249564/ /pubmed/32548581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2633105520922181 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Etherton-Beer, Christopher Lui, Yee Radalj, Miranda Vallence, Ann-Maree Singer, Barby Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Optimise Participation in Stroke Rehabilitation – A Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Feasibility Study |
title | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Optimise Participation in
Stroke Rehabilitation – A Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Feasibility
Study |
title_full | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Optimise Participation in
Stroke Rehabilitation – A Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Feasibility
Study |
title_fullStr | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Optimise Participation in
Stroke Rehabilitation – A Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Feasibility
Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Optimise Participation in
Stroke Rehabilitation – A Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Feasibility
Study |
title_short | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Optimise Participation in
Stroke Rehabilitation – A Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Feasibility
Study |
title_sort | transcranial direct current stimulation to optimise participation in
stroke rehabilitation – a sham-controlled cross-over feasibility
study |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32548581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2633105520922181 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ethertonbeerchristopher transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationtooptimiseparticipationinstrokerehabilitationashamcontrolledcrossoverfeasibilitystudy AT luiyee transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationtooptimiseparticipationinstrokerehabilitationashamcontrolledcrossoverfeasibilitystudy AT radaljmiranda transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationtooptimiseparticipationinstrokerehabilitationashamcontrolledcrossoverfeasibilitystudy AT vallenceannmaree transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationtooptimiseparticipationinstrokerehabilitationashamcontrolledcrossoverfeasibilitystudy AT singerbarby transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationtooptimiseparticipationinstrokerehabilitationashamcontrolledcrossoverfeasibilitystudy |