Cargando…

Impact of an On-Site Versus Remote Patient Navigator on Pediatricians’ Referrals and Families’ Receipt of Resources for Unmet Social Needs

Background: Patient navigation is increasingly being used by pediatric health care delivery systems to address patients’ unmet social needs. However, it is not known whether navigators working remotely can be as effective at linking families to community resources as on-site navigators. The aim of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Messmer, Emily, Brochier, Annelise, Joseph, Marie, Tripodis, Yorghos, Garg, Arvin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32449443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2150132720924252
_version_ 1783538614936797184
author Messmer, Emily
Brochier, Annelise
Joseph, Marie
Tripodis, Yorghos
Garg, Arvin
author_facet Messmer, Emily
Brochier, Annelise
Joseph, Marie
Tripodis, Yorghos
Garg, Arvin
author_sort Messmer, Emily
collection PubMed
description Background: Patient navigation is increasingly being used by pediatric health care delivery systems to address patients’ unmet social needs. However, it is not known whether navigators working remotely can be as effective at linking families to community resources as on-site navigators. The aim of this study was to assess whether a patient navigator located on-site versus remotely is more likely to receive referrals from clinicians, successfully follow-up with patients, and assist families with enrollment in social needs resources. Methods: A patient navigator worked on-site and remotely as she divided her time between 4 federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) from May 2015 to June 2019. We conducted a 1-sample test of proportion comparing the proportion of on-site referrals made with the proportion of the week spent in each FQHC. To assess the impact of on-site versus remote referrals on number of contacts with a family, we conducted a 2-sample t test. We used chi-square testing to assess the effect of on-site versus remote status on resource enrollment. Results: Of the referrals (N = 414) made to the patient navigator, the majority were made through the electronic health record (83%) versus in person (17%) (P < .0001). When the navigator was on-site, significantly more referrals were made than expected (45% vs 29%, P < .0001). Between remote and on-site referral groups, there was no significant difference in number of contact points (1.0 vs 1.1 points, P = .32) or in the proportion of families who received a resource (4.6% vs 5.1%, P = .31). Conclusion: Our results indicate that clinicians were significantly more likely to refer families to patient navigation if the navigator was on-site. The likelihood of having contact with the navigator and enrolling in a resource, however, did not differ between families referred when the patient navigator was on-site compared with remote.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7249580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72495802020-06-15 Impact of an On-Site Versus Remote Patient Navigator on Pediatricians’ Referrals and Families’ Receipt of Resources for Unmet Social Needs Messmer, Emily Brochier, Annelise Joseph, Marie Tripodis, Yorghos Garg, Arvin J Prim Care Community Health Original Research Background: Patient navigation is increasingly being used by pediatric health care delivery systems to address patients’ unmet social needs. However, it is not known whether navigators working remotely can be as effective at linking families to community resources as on-site navigators. The aim of this study was to assess whether a patient navigator located on-site versus remotely is more likely to receive referrals from clinicians, successfully follow-up with patients, and assist families with enrollment in social needs resources. Methods: A patient navigator worked on-site and remotely as she divided her time between 4 federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) from May 2015 to June 2019. We conducted a 1-sample test of proportion comparing the proportion of on-site referrals made with the proportion of the week spent in each FQHC. To assess the impact of on-site versus remote referrals on number of contacts with a family, we conducted a 2-sample t test. We used chi-square testing to assess the effect of on-site versus remote status on resource enrollment. Results: Of the referrals (N = 414) made to the patient navigator, the majority were made through the electronic health record (83%) versus in person (17%) (P < .0001). When the navigator was on-site, significantly more referrals were made than expected (45% vs 29%, P < .0001). Between remote and on-site referral groups, there was no significant difference in number of contact points (1.0 vs 1.1 points, P = .32) or in the proportion of families who received a resource (4.6% vs 5.1%, P = .31). Conclusion: Our results indicate that clinicians were significantly more likely to refer families to patient navigation if the navigator was on-site. The likelihood of having contact with the navigator and enrolling in a resource, however, did not differ between families referred when the patient navigator was on-site compared with remote. SAGE Publications 2020-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7249580/ /pubmed/32449443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2150132720924252 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Messmer, Emily
Brochier, Annelise
Joseph, Marie
Tripodis, Yorghos
Garg, Arvin
Impact of an On-Site Versus Remote Patient Navigator on Pediatricians’ Referrals and Families’ Receipt of Resources for Unmet Social Needs
title Impact of an On-Site Versus Remote Patient Navigator on Pediatricians’ Referrals and Families’ Receipt of Resources for Unmet Social Needs
title_full Impact of an On-Site Versus Remote Patient Navigator on Pediatricians’ Referrals and Families’ Receipt of Resources for Unmet Social Needs
title_fullStr Impact of an On-Site Versus Remote Patient Navigator on Pediatricians’ Referrals and Families’ Receipt of Resources for Unmet Social Needs
title_full_unstemmed Impact of an On-Site Versus Remote Patient Navigator on Pediatricians’ Referrals and Families’ Receipt of Resources for Unmet Social Needs
title_short Impact of an On-Site Versus Remote Patient Navigator on Pediatricians’ Referrals and Families’ Receipt of Resources for Unmet Social Needs
title_sort impact of an on-site versus remote patient navigator on pediatricians’ referrals and families’ receipt of resources for unmet social needs
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32449443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2150132720924252
work_keys_str_mv AT messmeremily impactofanonsiteversusremotepatientnavigatoronpediatriciansreferralsandfamiliesreceiptofresourcesforunmetsocialneeds
AT brochierannelise impactofanonsiteversusremotepatientnavigatoronpediatriciansreferralsandfamiliesreceiptofresourcesforunmetsocialneeds
AT josephmarie impactofanonsiteversusremotepatientnavigatoronpediatriciansreferralsandfamiliesreceiptofresourcesforunmetsocialneeds
AT tripodisyorghos impactofanonsiteversusremotepatientnavigatoronpediatriciansreferralsandfamiliesreceiptofresourcesforunmetsocialneeds
AT gargarvin impactofanonsiteversusremotepatientnavigatoronpediatriciansreferralsandfamiliesreceiptofresourcesforunmetsocialneeds