Cargando…
Percutaneous insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter is a safe and effective technique irrespective of BMI
BACKGROUND: A large body mass index (BMI) has been considered as a relative contraindication for percutaneous catheter insertion, although this technique has many advantages. Up to now, there are few studies on peritoneal catheter placement and obesity. The aim of this study was to determine whether...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32450790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01850-5 |
_version_ | 1783538623675629568 |
---|---|
author | Xie, Dayang Zhou, Jianhui Cao, Xueying Zhang, Qingtao Sun, Yanli Tang, Li Huang, Jing Zheng, Juanli Lin, Li Li, Zhenzhen Cai, Guangyan Chen, Xiangmei |
author_facet | Xie, Dayang Zhou, Jianhui Cao, Xueying Zhang, Qingtao Sun, Yanli Tang, Li Huang, Jing Zheng, Juanli Lin, Li Li, Zhenzhen Cai, Guangyan Chen, Xiangmei |
author_sort | Xie, Dayang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A large body mass index (BMI) has been considered as a relative contraindication for percutaneous catheter insertion, although this technique has many advantages. Up to now, there are few studies on peritoneal catheter placement and obesity. The aim of this study was to determine whether patients with large BMI can also choose the percutaneous technique for peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion. METHODS: One hundred eighty seven consecutive patients underwent peritoneal catheter insertions in the Chinese PLA General Hospital between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2016, with 178 eligible cases being included in the analysis. Two groups were created based on the catheter insertion techniques, the percutaneous group (group P) and the surgical group (group S). Subgroups were created according to BMI > 28 or ≤ 28. The outcomes included catheter related complications and catheter survival. RESULTS: Total infectious complication rates were significantly lower in group P than in group S. There were no significant differences in peritonitis rate between group P and group S (1.20% vs. 3.16% with P = 0.71 in early stage, and 4.82% vs. 11.58% with P = 0.11 in late stage). All other measured complications were similar between the two groups. Though the one-year infection-free catheter survival in group P was 7.5% higher than group S, the difference was not significant. The one-year dysfunction-free catheter survival, one-year dysfunction-and-infection-free catheter survival, and overall catheter survival were similar between the two groups. Subgroup analyses showed a superior one-year infection-free catheter survival of percutaneous technique in patients with BMI > 28, which was confirmed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the challenges that may be encountered with patients who have a large BMI, the percutaneous technique seems to be a safe and effective approach to placing a peritoneal dialysis catheter. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7249625 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72496252020-06-04 Percutaneous insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter is a safe and effective technique irrespective of BMI Xie, Dayang Zhou, Jianhui Cao, Xueying Zhang, Qingtao Sun, Yanli Tang, Li Huang, Jing Zheng, Juanli Lin, Li Li, Zhenzhen Cai, Guangyan Chen, Xiangmei BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: A large body mass index (BMI) has been considered as a relative contraindication for percutaneous catheter insertion, although this technique has many advantages. Up to now, there are few studies on peritoneal catheter placement and obesity. The aim of this study was to determine whether patients with large BMI can also choose the percutaneous technique for peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion. METHODS: One hundred eighty seven consecutive patients underwent peritoneal catheter insertions in the Chinese PLA General Hospital between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2016, with 178 eligible cases being included in the analysis. Two groups were created based on the catheter insertion techniques, the percutaneous group (group P) and the surgical group (group S). Subgroups were created according to BMI > 28 or ≤ 28. The outcomes included catheter related complications and catheter survival. RESULTS: Total infectious complication rates were significantly lower in group P than in group S. There were no significant differences in peritonitis rate between group P and group S (1.20% vs. 3.16% with P = 0.71 in early stage, and 4.82% vs. 11.58% with P = 0.11 in late stage). All other measured complications were similar between the two groups. Though the one-year infection-free catheter survival in group P was 7.5% higher than group S, the difference was not significant. The one-year dysfunction-free catheter survival, one-year dysfunction-and-infection-free catheter survival, and overall catheter survival were similar between the two groups. Subgroup analyses showed a superior one-year infection-free catheter survival of percutaneous technique in patients with BMI > 28, which was confirmed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the challenges that may be encountered with patients who have a large BMI, the percutaneous technique seems to be a safe and effective approach to placing a peritoneal dialysis catheter. BioMed Central 2020-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7249625/ /pubmed/32450790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01850-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Xie, Dayang Zhou, Jianhui Cao, Xueying Zhang, Qingtao Sun, Yanli Tang, Li Huang, Jing Zheng, Juanli Lin, Li Li, Zhenzhen Cai, Guangyan Chen, Xiangmei Percutaneous insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter is a safe and effective technique irrespective of BMI |
title | Percutaneous insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter is a safe and effective technique irrespective of BMI |
title_full | Percutaneous insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter is a safe and effective technique irrespective of BMI |
title_fullStr | Percutaneous insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter is a safe and effective technique irrespective of BMI |
title_full_unstemmed | Percutaneous insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter is a safe and effective technique irrespective of BMI |
title_short | Percutaneous insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter is a safe and effective technique irrespective of BMI |
title_sort | percutaneous insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter is a safe and effective technique irrespective of bmi |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32450790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01850-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiedayang percutaneousinsertionofperitonealdialysiscatheterisasafeandeffectivetechniqueirrespectiveofbmi AT zhoujianhui percutaneousinsertionofperitonealdialysiscatheterisasafeandeffectivetechniqueirrespectiveofbmi AT caoxueying percutaneousinsertionofperitonealdialysiscatheterisasafeandeffectivetechniqueirrespectiveofbmi AT zhangqingtao percutaneousinsertionofperitonealdialysiscatheterisasafeandeffectivetechniqueirrespectiveofbmi AT sunyanli percutaneousinsertionofperitonealdialysiscatheterisasafeandeffectivetechniqueirrespectiveofbmi AT tangli percutaneousinsertionofperitonealdialysiscatheterisasafeandeffectivetechniqueirrespectiveofbmi AT huangjing percutaneousinsertionofperitonealdialysiscatheterisasafeandeffectivetechniqueirrespectiveofbmi AT zhengjuanli percutaneousinsertionofperitonealdialysiscatheterisasafeandeffectivetechniqueirrespectiveofbmi AT linli percutaneousinsertionofperitonealdialysiscatheterisasafeandeffectivetechniqueirrespectiveofbmi AT lizhenzhen percutaneousinsertionofperitonealdialysiscatheterisasafeandeffectivetechniqueirrespectiveofbmi AT caiguangyan percutaneousinsertionofperitonealdialysiscatheterisasafeandeffectivetechniqueirrespectiveofbmi AT chenxiangmei percutaneousinsertionofperitonealdialysiscatheterisasafeandeffectivetechniqueirrespectiveofbmi |