Cargando…

Percutaneous insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter is a safe and effective technique irrespective of BMI

BACKGROUND: A large body mass index (BMI) has been considered as a relative contraindication for percutaneous catheter insertion, although this technique has many advantages. Up to now, there are few studies on peritoneal catheter placement and obesity. The aim of this study was to determine whether...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Dayang, Zhou, Jianhui, Cao, Xueying, Zhang, Qingtao, Sun, Yanli, Tang, Li, Huang, Jing, Zheng, Juanli, Lin, Li, Li, Zhenzhen, Cai, Guangyan, Chen, Xiangmei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32450790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01850-5
_version_ 1783538623675629568
author Xie, Dayang
Zhou, Jianhui
Cao, Xueying
Zhang, Qingtao
Sun, Yanli
Tang, Li
Huang, Jing
Zheng, Juanli
Lin, Li
Li, Zhenzhen
Cai, Guangyan
Chen, Xiangmei
author_facet Xie, Dayang
Zhou, Jianhui
Cao, Xueying
Zhang, Qingtao
Sun, Yanli
Tang, Li
Huang, Jing
Zheng, Juanli
Lin, Li
Li, Zhenzhen
Cai, Guangyan
Chen, Xiangmei
author_sort Xie, Dayang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A large body mass index (BMI) has been considered as a relative contraindication for percutaneous catheter insertion, although this technique has many advantages. Up to now, there are few studies on peritoneal catheter placement and obesity. The aim of this study was to determine whether patients with large BMI can also choose the percutaneous technique for peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion. METHODS: One hundred eighty seven consecutive patients underwent peritoneal catheter insertions in the Chinese PLA General Hospital between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2016, with 178 eligible cases being included in the analysis. Two groups were created based on the catheter insertion techniques, the percutaneous group (group P) and the surgical group (group S). Subgroups were created according to BMI > 28 or ≤ 28. The outcomes included catheter related complications and catheter survival. RESULTS: Total infectious complication rates were significantly lower in group P than in group S. There were no significant differences in peritonitis rate between group P and group S (1.20% vs. 3.16% with P = 0.71 in early stage, and 4.82% vs. 11.58% with P = 0.11 in late stage). All other measured complications were similar between the two groups. Though the one-year infection-free catheter survival in group P was 7.5% higher than group S, the difference was not significant. The one-year dysfunction-free catheter survival, one-year dysfunction-and-infection-free catheter survival, and overall catheter survival were similar between the two groups. Subgroup analyses showed a superior one-year infection-free catheter survival of percutaneous technique in patients with BMI > 28, which was confirmed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the challenges that may be encountered with patients who have a large BMI, the percutaneous technique seems to be a safe and effective approach to placing a peritoneal dialysis catheter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7249625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72496252020-06-04 Percutaneous insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter is a safe and effective technique irrespective of BMI Xie, Dayang Zhou, Jianhui Cao, Xueying Zhang, Qingtao Sun, Yanli Tang, Li Huang, Jing Zheng, Juanli Lin, Li Li, Zhenzhen Cai, Guangyan Chen, Xiangmei BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: A large body mass index (BMI) has been considered as a relative contraindication for percutaneous catheter insertion, although this technique has many advantages. Up to now, there are few studies on peritoneal catheter placement and obesity. The aim of this study was to determine whether patients with large BMI can also choose the percutaneous technique for peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion. METHODS: One hundred eighty seven consecutive patients underwent peritoneal catheter insertions in the Chinese PLA General Hospital between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2016, with 178 eligible cases being included in the analysis. Two groups were created based on the catheter insertion techniques, the percutaneous group (group P) and the surgical group (group S). Subgroups were created according to BMI > 28 or ≤ 28. The outcomes included catheter related complications and catheter survival. RESULTS: Total infectious complication rates were significantly lower in group P than in group S. There were no significant differences in peritonitis rate between group P and group S (1.20% vs. 3.16% with P = 0.71 in early stage, and 4.82% vs. 11.58% with P = 0.11 in late stage). All other measured complications were similar between the two groups. Though the one-year infection-free catheter survival in group P was 7.5% higher than group S, the difference was not significant. The one-year dysfunction-free catheter survival, one-year dysfunction-and-infection-free catheter survival, and overall catheter survival were similar between the two groups. Subgroup analyses showed a superior one-year infection-free catheter survival of percutaneous technique in patients with BMI > 28, which was confirmed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the challenges that may be encountered with patients who have a large BMI, the percutaneous technique seems to be a safe and effective approach to placing a peritoneal dialysis catheter. BioMed Central 2020-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7249625/ /pubmed/32450790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01850-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xie, Dayang
Zhou, Jianhui
Cao, Xueying
Zhang, Qingtao
Sun, Yanli
Tang, Li
Huang, Jing
Zheng, Juanli
Lin, Li
Li, Zhenzhen
Cai, Guangyan
Chen, Xiangmei
Percutaneous insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter is a safe and effective technique irrespective of BMI
title Percutaneous insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter is a safe and effective technique irrespective of BMI
title_full Percutaneous insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter is a safe and effective technique irrespective of BMI
title_fullStr Percutaneous insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter is a safe and effective technique irrespective of BMI
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter is a safe and effective technique irrespective of BMI
title_short Percutaneous insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter is a safe and effective technique irrespective of BMI
title_sort percutaneous insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter is a safe and effective technique irrespective of bmi
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32450790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01850-5
work_keys_str_mv AT xiedayang percutaneousinsertionofperitonealdialysiscatheterisasafeandeffectivetechniqueirrespectiveofbmi
AT zhoujianhui percutaneousinsertionofperitonealdialysiscatheterisasafeandeffectivetechniqueirrespectiveofbmi
AT caoxueying percutaneousinsertionofperitonealdialysiscatheterisasafeandeffectivetechniqueirrespectiveofbmi
AT zhangqingtao percutaneousinsertionofperitonealdialysiscatheterisasafeandeffectivetechniqueirrespectiveofbmi
AT sunyanli percutaneousinsertionofperitonealdialysiscatheterisasafeandeffectivetechniqueirrespectiveofbmi
AT tangli percutaneousinsertionofperitonealdialysiscatheterisasafeandeffectivetechniqueirrespectiveofbmi
AT huangjing percutaneousinsertionofperitonealdialysiscatheterisasafeandeffectivetechniqueirrespectiveofbmi
AT zhengjuanli percutaneousinsertionofperitonealdialysiscatheterisasafeandeffectivetechniqueirrespectiveofbmi
AT linli percutaneousinsertionofperitonealdialysiscatheterisasafeandeffectivetechniqueirrespectiveofbmi
AT lizhenzhen percutaneousinsertionofperitonealdialysiscatheterisasafeandeffectivetechniqueirrespectiveofbmi
AT caiguangyan percutaneousinsertionofperitonealdialysiscatheterisasafeandeffectivetechniqueirrespectiveofbmi
AT chenxiangmei percutaneousinsertionofperitonealdialysiscatheterisasafeandeffectivetechniqueirrespectiveofbmi