Cargando…

Running-based high-intensity interval training vs. small-sided game training programs: effects on the physical performance, psychophysiological responses and technical skills in young soccer players

This study aimed to compare the effects of 5-week running-based high-intensity interval training (HIIT) vs. small-sided game training (SSG) on the physical performance, psychophysiological responses and technical skills in young soccer players. Twenty young male soccer players (age: 14.2±0.5 years,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arslan, Ersan, Orer, Gamze Erikoglu, Clemente, Filipe Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32508384
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2020.94237
_version_ 1783538658719039488
author Arslan, Ersan
Orer, Gamze Erikoglu
Clemente, Filipe Manuel
author_facet Arslan, Ersan
Orer, Gamze Erikoglu
Clemente, Filipe Manuel
author_sort Arslan, Ersan
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to compare the effects of 5-week running-based high-intensity interval training (HIIT) vs. small-sided game training (SSG) on the physical performance, psychophysiological responses and technical skills in young soccer players. Twenty young male soccer players (age: 14.2±0.5 years, height: 161.8±7.9 cm) participated in this study and were assigned to two groups: the HIIT group (n=10) and SSG group (n=10). Both groups trained twice per week with a similar total training duration. The SSG consisted of two 5–9 minutes of 2-a-side with 2-minute passive rest periods, whereas the HIIT consisted of 12–20 minutes of continuous runs at intensities (90 to 95%) related to the velocity obtained in the 30–15 intermittent fitness test. Before and after the 5-week training periods the following tests were completed: maximum oxygen consumption (VO(2max)) from the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test level 1 (YYIRTL-1), 10–30-m sprint test, countermovement jump [CMJ], squat jump [SJ], and drop jump [DJ]), 1000-m run test, zigzag agility, repeated sprint ability, 30–15 intermittent fitness test and speed dribbling ability test. Our results revealed meaningful improvements in YYIRTL-1 performance (SSG: +12.8%, standardized effect size [d]=-1.46; HIIT: +16.4%, d=3.27 and VO(2max) (SSG: +3.3%, d=-1.48; HIIT: +4.3%, d=2.61). There was a meaningful greater improvement in agility and technical test performances following the SSG training compared with the HIIT (p ≤ 0.05, d=ranging from 0.92 to 1.99). By contrast, the HIIT group showed meaningfully higher performance responses in terms of the 1000-m running time and repeated sprint test ability (p ≤ 0.05, d=ranging from 0.90 to 2.06). These results confirmed that SSG training might be a more effective training regime to improve technical ability and agility with greater enjoyment, whereas HIIT might be more suitable for speed-based conditioning in young soccer players.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7249797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Institute of Sport in Warsaw
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72497972020-06-06 Running-based high-intensity interval training vs. small-sided game training programs: effects on the physical performance, psychophysiological responses and technical skills in young soccer players Arslan, Ersan Orer, Gamze Erikoglu Clemente, Filipe Manuel Biol Sport Original Paper This study aimed to compare the effects of 5-week running-based high-intensity interval training (HIIT) vs. small-sided game training (SSG) on the physical performance, psychophysiological responses and technical skills in young soccer players. Twenty young male soccer players (age: 14.2±0.5 years, height: 161.8±7.9 cm) participated in this study and were assigned to two groups: the HIIT group (n=10) and SSG group (n=10). Both groups trained twice per week with a similar total training duration. The SSG consisted of two 5–9 minutes of 2-a-side with 2-minute passive rest periods, whereas the HIIT consisted of 12–20 minutes of continuous runs at intensities (90 to 95%) related to the velocity obtained in the 30–15 intermittent fitness test. Before and after the 5-week training periods the following tests were completed: maximum oxygen consumption (VO(2max)) from the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test level 1 (YYIRTL-1), 10–30-m sprint test, countermovement jump [CMJ], squat jump [SJ], and drop jump [DJ]), 1000-m run test, zigzag agility, repeated sprint ability, 30–15 intermittent fitness test and speed dribbling ability test. Our results revealed meaningful improvements in YYIRTL-1 performance (SSG: +12.8%, standardized effect size [d]=-1.46; HIIT: +16.4%, d=3.27 and VO(2max) (SSG: +3.3%, d=-1.48; HIIT: +4.3%, d=2.61). There was a meaningful greater improvement in agility and technical test performances following the SSG training compared with the HIIT (p ≤ 0.05, d=ranging from 0.92 to 1.99). By contrast, the HIIT group showed meaningfully higher performance responses in terms of the 1000-m running time and repeated sprint test ability (p ≤ 0.05, d=ranging from 0.90 to 2.06). These results confirmed that SSG training might be a more effective training regime to improve technical ability and agility with greater enjoyment, whereas HIIT might be more suitable for speed-based conditioning in young soccer players. Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2020-03-31 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7249797/ /pubmed/32508384 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2020.94237 Text en Copyright © Biology of Sport 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Arslan, Ersan
Orer, Gamze Erikoglu
Clemente, Filipe Manuel
Running-based high-intensity interval training vs. small-sided game training programs: effects on the physical performance, psychophysiological responses and technical skills in young soccer players
title Running-based high-intensity interval training vs. small-sided game training programs: effects on the physical performance, psychophysiological responses and technical skills in young soccer players
title_full Running-based high-intensity interval training vs. small-sided game training programs: effects on the physical performance, psychophysiological responses and technical skills in young soccer players
title_fullStr Running-based high-intensity interval training vs. small-sided game training programs: effects on the physical performance, psychophysiological responses and technical skills in young soccer players
title_full_unstemmed Running-based high-intensity interval training vs. small-sided game training programs: effects on the physical performance, psychophysiological responses and technical skills in young soccer players
title_short Running-based high-intensity interval training vs. small-sided game training programs: effects on the physical performance, psychophysiological responses and technical skills in young soccer players
title_sort running-based high-intensity interval training vs. small-sided game training programs: effects on the physical performance, psychophysiological responses and technical skills in young soccer players
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32508384
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2020.94237
work_keys_str_mv AT arslanersan runningbasedhighintensityintervaltrainingvssmallsidedgametrainingprogramseffectsonthephysicalperformancepsychophysiologicalresponsesandtechnicalskillsinyoungsoccerplayers
AT orergamzeerikoglu runningbasedhighintensityintervaltrainingvssmallsidedgametrainingprogramseffectsonthephysicalperformancepsychophysiologicalresponsesandtechnicalskillsinyoungsoccerplayers
AT clementefilipemanuel runningbasedhighintensityintervaltrainingvssmallsidedgametrainingprogramseffectsonthephysicalperformancepsychophysiologicalresponsesandtechnicalskillsinyoungsoccerplayers