Cargando…
Dynesys system vs posterior decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases
BACKGROUND: The Dynesys dynamic stabilization system is an alternative to rigid instrumentation and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy between Dynesys and posterior decompression and fusion for lumbar degenerative d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32481251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019784 |
_version_ | 1783538665903882240 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Hongbo Peng, Jun Zeng, Qingshen Zhong, Yanchun Xiao, Chunlin Ye, Yongjun Huang, Weimin Liu, Wuyang Luo, Jiaquan |
author_facet | Wang, Hongbo Peng, Jun Zeng, Qingshen Zhong, Yanchun Xiao, Chunlin Ye, Yongjun Huang, Weimin Liu, Wuyang Luo, Jiaquan |
author_sort | Wang, Hongbo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Dynesys dynamic stabilization system is an alternative to rigid instrumentation and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy between Dynesys and posterior decompression and fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases. METHODS: The computer was used to retrieve the Cochrane library, Medline, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang database and Chinese biomedical literature database; and the references and main Chinese and English Department of orthopedics journals were manually searched. All the prospective or retrospective comparative studies on the clinical efficacy and safety of Dynesys and posterior decompression and fusion were collected, so as to evaluate the methodological quality of the study and to extract the data. The RevMan 5.2 software was used for data analysis. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in Oswestry disability index and visual analogue score for leg pain, visual analogue score for back pain, L2–S1 ROM between Dynesys and fusion group. Operation time, blood loss, length of stay and complications in the Dynesys group were significantly less than that in the fusion group. Adjacent-segment degeneration in the fusion group was significantly higher than that in the Dynesys group. In addition, postoperative operated segment ROM was significantly less in the fusion group as compared to the Dynesys group. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that Dynesys system acquires comparable clinical outcomes compared to fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. Moreover, compared with fusion, Dynesys could remain ROM of surgical segments with less operation time, blood loss, length of stay, adjacent-segment degeneration, and lower complication. Further studies with large samples, long term follow up and well-designed are needed to assess the two procedures in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7249866 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72498662020-06-15 Dynesys system vs posterior decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases Wang, Hongbo Peng, Jun Zeng, Qingshen Zhong, Yanchun Xiao, Chunlin Ye, Yongjun Huang, Weimin Liu, Wuyang Luo, Jiaquan Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 BACKGROUND: The Dynesys dynamic stabilization system is an alternative to rigid instrumentation and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy between Dynesys and posterior decompression and fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases. METHODS: The computer was used to retrieve the Cochrane library, Medline, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang database and Chinese biomedical literature database; and the references and main Chinese and English Department of orthopedics journals were manually searched. All the prospective or retrospective comparative studies on the clinical efficacy and safety of Dynesys and posterior decompression and fusion were collected, so as to evaluate the methodological quality of the study and to extract the data. The RevMan 5.2 software was used for data analysis. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in Oswestry disability index and visual analogue score for leg pain, visual analogue score for back pain, L2–S1 ROM between Dynesys and fusion group. Operation time, blood loss, length of stay and complications in the Dynesys group were significantly less than that in the fusion group. Adjacent-segment degeneration in the fusion group was significantly higher than that in the Dynesys group. In addition, postoperative operated segment ROM was significantly less in the fusion group as compared to the Dynesys group. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that Dynesys system acquires comparable clinical outcomes compared to fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. Moreover, compared with fusion, Dynesys could remain ROM of surgical segments with less operation time, blood loss, length of stay, adjacent-segment degeneration, and lower complication. Further studies with large samples, long term follow up and well-designed are needed to assess the two procedures in the future. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7249866/ /pubmed/32481251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019784 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 7100 Wang, Hongbo Peng, Jun Zeng, Qingshen Zhong, Yanchun Xiao, Chunlin Ye, Yongjun Huang, Weimin Liu, Wuyang Luo, Jiaquan Dynesys system vs posterior decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases |
title | Dynesys system vs posterior decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases |
title_full | Dynesys system vs posterior decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases |
title_fullStr | Dynesys system vs posterior decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases |
title_full_unstemmed | Dynesys system vs posterior decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases |
title_short | Dynesys system vs posterior decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases |
title_sort | dynesys system vs posterior decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases |
topic | 7100 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32481251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019784 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanghongbo dynesyssystemvsposteriordecompressionandfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseases AT pengjun dynesyssystemvsposteriordecompressionandfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseases AT zengqingshen dynesyssystemvsposteriordecompressionandfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseases AT zhongyanchun dynesyssystemvsposteriordecompressionandfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseases AT xiaochunlin dynesyssystemvsposteriordecompressionandfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseases AT yeyongjun dynesyssystemvsposteriordecompressionandfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseases AT huangweimin dynesyssystemvsposteriordecompressionandfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseases AT liuwuyang dynesyssystemvsposteriordecompressionandfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseases AT luojiaquan dynesyssystemvsposteriordecompressionandfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseases |