Cargando…

Dynesys system vs posterior decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases

BACKGROUND: The Dynesys dynamic stabilization system is an alternative to rigid instrumentation and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy between Dynesys and posterior decompression and fusion for lumbar degenerative d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Hongbo, Peng, Jun, Zeng, Qingshen, Zhong, Yanchun, Xiao, Chunlin, Ye, Yongjun, Huang, Weimin, Liu, Wuyang, Luo, Jiaquan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32481251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019784
_version_ 1783538665903882240
author Wang, Hongbo
Peng, Jun
Zeng, Qingshen
Zhong, Yanchun
Xiao, Chunlin
Ye, Yongjun
Huang, Weimin
Liu, Wuyang
Luo, Jiaquan
author_facet Wang, Hongbo
Peng, Jun
Zeng, Qingshen
Zhong, Yanchun
Xiao, Chunlin
Ye, Yongjun
Huang, Weimin
Liu, Wuyang
Luo, Jiaquan
author_sort Wang, Hongbo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Dynesys dynamic stabilization system is an alternative to rigid instrumentation and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy between Dynesys and posterior decompression and fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases. METHODS: The computer was used to retrieve the Cochrane library, Medline, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang database and Chinese biomedical literature database; and the references and main Chinese and English Department of orthopedics journals were manually searched. All the prospective or retrospective comparative studies on the clinical efficacy and safety of Dynesys and posterior decompression and fusion were collected, so as to evaluate the methodological quality of the study and to extract the data. The RevMan 5.2 software was used for data analysis. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in Oswestry disability index and visual analogue score for leg pain, visual analogue score for back pain, L2–S1 ROM between Dynesys and fusion group. Operation time, blood loss, length of stay and complications in the Dynesys group were significantly less than that in the fusion group. Adjacent-segment degeneration in the fusion group was significantly higher than that in the Dynesys group. In addition, postoperative operated segment ROM was significantly less in the fusion group as compared to the Dynesys group. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that Dynesys system acquires comparable clinical outcomes compared to fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. Moreover, compared with fusion, Dynesys could remain ROM of surgical segments with less operation time, blood loss, length of stay, adjacent-segment degeneration, and lower complication. Further studies with large samples, long term follow up and well-designed are needed to assess the two procedures in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7249866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72498662020-06-15 Dynesys system vs posterior decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases Wang, Hongbo Peng, Jun Zeng, Qingshen Zhong, Yanchun Xiao, Chunlin Ye, Yongjun Huang, Weimin Liu, Wuyang Luo, Jiaquan Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 BACKGROUND: The Dynesys dynamic stabilization system is an alternative to rigid instrumentation and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy between Dynesys and posterior decompression and fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases. METHODS: The computer was used to retrieve the Cochrane library, Medline, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang database and Chinese biomedical literature database; and the references and main Chinese and English Department of orthopedics journals were manually searched. All the prospective or retrospective comparative studies on the clinical efficacy and safety of Dynesys and posterior decompression and fusion were collected, so as to evaluate the methodological quality of the study and to extract the data. The RevMan 5.2 software was used for data analysis. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in Oswestry disability index and visual analogue score for leg pain, visual analogue score for back pain, L2–S1 ROM between Dynesys and fusion group. Operation time, blood loss, length of stay and complications in the Dynesys group were significantly less than that in the fusion group. Adjacent-segment degeneration in the fusion group was significantly higher than that in the Dynesys group. In addition, postoperative operated segment ROM was significantly less in the fusion group as compared to the Dynesys group. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that Dynesys system acquires comparable clinical outcomes compared to fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. Moreover, compared with fusion, Dynesys could remain ROM of surgical segments with less operation time, blood loss, length of stay, adjacent-segment degeneration, and lower complication. Further studies with large samples, long term follow up and well-designed are needed to assess the two procedures in the future. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7249866/ /pubmed/32481251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019784 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
Wang, Hongbo
Peng, Jun
Zeng, Qingshen
Zhong, Yanchun
Xiao, Chunlin
Ye, Yongjun
Huang, Weimin
Liu, Wuyang
Luo, Jiaquan
Dynesys system vs posterior decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases
title Dynesys system vs posterior decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases
title_full Dynesys system vs posterior decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases
title_fullStr Dynesys system vs posterior decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases
title_full_unstemmed Dynesys system vs posterior decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases
title_short Dynesys system vs posterior decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases
title_sort dynesys system vs posterior decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32481251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019784
work_keys_str_mv AT wanghongbo dynesyssystemvsposteriordecompressionandfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseases
AT pengjun dynesyssystemvsposteriordecompressionandfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseases
AT zengqingshen dynesyssystemvsposteriordecompressionandfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseases
AT zhongyanchun dynesyssystemvsposteriordecompressionandfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseases
AT xiaochunlin dynesyssystemvsposteriordecompressionandfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseases
AT yeyongjun dynesyssystemvsposteriordecompressionandfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseases
AT huangweimin dynesyssystemvsposteriordecompressionandfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseases
AT liuwuyang dynesyssystemvsposteriordecompressionandfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseases
AT luojiaquan dynesyssystemvsposteriordecompressionandfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediseases