Cargando…

Appraisal and recommendation synthesis of guidelines and consensuses for interventions of pressure ulcers: A protocol for systematic review

BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers (PU) bring a considerable physical and mental burden on patients and their families, and have put families and government under tremendous pressure to cover the cost for treatment. Therefore, this protocol proposes to evaluate the quality of existing PU clinical practice...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geng, Jie, Yang, Ke-Lu, Cai, Yi-Tong, Shi, Ji-Yuan, Yin, Min, Wang, Xiao-Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32481344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020417
_version_ 1783538675058999296
author Geng, Jie
Yang, Ke-Lu
Cai, Yi-Tong
Shi, Ji-Yuan
Yin, Min
Wang, Xiao-Ping
author_facet Geng, Jie
Yang, Ke-Lu
Cai, Yi-Tong
Shi, Ji-Yuan
Yin, Min
Wang, Xiao-Ping
author_sort Geng, Jie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers (PU) bring a considerable physical and mental burden on patients and their families, and have put families and government under tremendous pressure to cover the cost for treatment. Therefore, this protocol proposes to evaluate the quality of existing PU clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and compare the similarities and differences between its recommendations in order to improve the treatment efficacy and reduce the PU treatment cost. METHODS: Electronic databases and specific databases of CPGs will be searched. Study selection and data collection will be performed independently by two reviewers. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) Instrument and Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) will be used to assess the methodological quality and reporting quality of included CPGs. Bubble plot will be used to describe the difference of the quality, and mind mapping will be plotted to illustrate the comparison of recommendations of a guideline when needed. R software, MindMaster and Excel will be used. RESULTS: The results of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. CONCLUSION: This systematic review will provide comprehensive evidence of CPGs of PU. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020149176.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7249905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72499052020-06-15 Appraisal and recommendation synthesis of guidelines and consensuses for interventions of pressure ulcers: A protocol for systematic review Geng, Jie Yang, Ke-Lu Cai, Yi-Tong Shi, Ji-Yuan Yin, Min Wang, Xiao-Ping Medicine (Baltimore) 3900 BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers (PU) bring a considerable physical and mental burden on patients and their families, and have put families and government under tremendous pressure to cover the cost for treatment. Therefore, this protocol proposes to evaluate the quality of existing PU clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and compare the similarities and differences between its recommendations in order to improve the treatment efficacy and reduce the PU treatment cost. METHODS: Electronic databases and specific databases of CPGs will be searched. Study selection and data collection will be performed independently by two reviewers. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) Instrument and Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) will be used to assess the methodological quality and reporting quality of included CPGs. Bubble plot will be used to describe the difference of the quality, and mind mapping will be plotted to illustrate the comparison of recommendations of a guideline when needed. R software, MindMaster and Excel will be used. RESULTS: The results of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. CONCLUSION: This systematic review will provide comprehensive evidence of CPGs of PU. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020149176. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7249905/ /pubmed/32481344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020417 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 3900
Geng, Jie
Yang, Ke-Lu
Cai, Yi-Tong
Shi, Ji-Yuan
Yin, Min
Wang, Xiao-Ping
Appraisal and recommendation synthesis of guidelines and consensuses for interventions of pressure ulcers: A protocol for systematic review
title Appraisal and recommendation synthesis of guidelines and consensuses for interventions of pressure ulcers: A protocol for systematic review
title_full Appraisal and recommendation synthesis of guidelines and consensuses for interventions of pressure ulcers: A protocol for systematic review
title_fullStr Appraisal and recommendation synthesis of guidelines and consensuses for interventions of pressure ulcers: A protocol for systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Appraisal and recommendation synthesis of guidelines and consensuses for interventions of pressure ulcers: A protocol for systematic review
title_short Appraisal and recommendation synthesis of guidelines and consensuses for interventions of pressure ulcers: A protocol for systematic review
title_sort appraisal and recommendation synthesis of guidelines and consensuses for interventions of pressure ulcers: a protocol for systematic review
topic 3900
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32481344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020417
work_keys_str_mv AT gengjie appraisalandrecommendationsynthesisofguidelinesandconsensusesforinterventionsofpressureulcersaprotocolforsystematicreview
AT yangkelu appraisalandrecommendationsynthesisofguidelinesandconsensusesforinterventionsofpressureulcersaprotocolforsystematicreview
AT caiyitong appraisalandrecommendationsynthesisofguidelinesandconsensusesforinterventionsofpressureulcersaprotocolforsystematicreview
AT shijiyuan appraisalandrecommendationsynthesisofguidelinesandconsensusesforinterventionsofpressureulcersaprotocolforsystematicreview
AT yinmin appraisalandrecommendationsynthesisofguidelinesandconsensusesforinterventionsofpressureulcersaprotocolforsystematicreview
AT wangxiaoping appraisalandrecommendationsynthesisofguidelinesandconsensusesforinterventionsofpressureulcersaprotocolforsystematicreview