Cargando…
Appraisal and recommendation synthesis of guidelines and consensuses for interventions of pressure ulcers: A protocol for systematic review
BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers (PU) bring a considerable physical and mental burden on patients and their families, and have put families and government under tremendous pressure to cover the cost for treatment. Therefore, this protocol proposes to evaluate the quality of existing PU clinical practice...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32481344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020417 |
_version_ | 1783538675058999296 |
---|---|
author | Geng, Jie Yang, Ke-Lu Cai, Yi-Tong Shi, Ji-Yuan Yin, Min Wang, Xiao-Ping |
author_facet | Geng, Jie Yang, Ke-Lu Cai, Yi-Tong Shi, Ji-Yuan Yin, Min Wang, Xiao-Ping |
author_sort | Geng, Jie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers (PU) bring a considerable physical and mental burden on patients and their families, and have put families and government under tremendous pressure to cover the cost for treatment. Therefore, this protocol proposes to evaluate the quality of existing PU clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and compare the similarities and differences between its recommendations in order to improve the treatment efficacy and reduce the PU treatment cost. METHODS: Electronic databases and specific databases of CPGs will be searched. Study selection and data collection will be performed independently by two reviewers. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) Instrument and Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) will be used to assess the methodological quality and reporting quality of included CPGs. Bubble plot will be used to describe the difference of the quality, and mind mapping will be plotted to illustrate the comparison of recommendations of a guideline when needed. R software, MindMaster and Excel will be used. RESULTS: The results of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. CONCLUSION: This systematic review will provide comprehensive evidence of CPGs of PU. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020149176. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7249905 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72499052020-06-15 Appraisal and recommendation synthesis of guidelines and consensuses for interventions of pressure ulcers: A protocol for systematic review Geng, Jie Yang, Ke-Lu Cai, Yi-Tong Shi, Ji-Yuan Yin, Min Wang, Xiao-Ping Medicine (Baltimore) 3900 BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers (PU) bring a considerable physical and mental burden on patients and their families, and have put families and government under tremendous pressure to cover the cost for treatment. Therefore, this protocol proposes to evaluate the quality of existing PU clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and compare the similarities and differences between its recommendations in order to improve the treatment efficacy and reduce the PU treatment cost. METHODS: Electronic databases and specific databases of CPGs will be searched. Study selection and data collection will be performed independently by two reviewers. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) Instrument and Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) will be used to assess the methodological quality and reporting quality of included CPGs. Bubble plot will be used to describe the difference of the quality, and mind mapping will be plotted to illustrate the comparison of recommendations of a guideline when needed. R software, MindMaster and Excel will be used. RESULTS: The results of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. CONCLUSION: This systematic review will provide comprehensive evidence of CPGs of PU. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020149176. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7249905/ /pubmed/32481344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020417 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 3900 Geng, Jie Yang, Ke-Lu Cai, Yi-Tong Shi, Ji-Yuan Yin, Min Wang, Xiao-Ping Appraisal and recommendation synthesis of guidelines and consensuses for interventions of pressure ulcers: A protocol for systematic review |
title | Appraisal and recommendation synthesis of guidelines and consensuses for interventions of pressure ulcers: A protocol for systematic review |
title_full | Appraisal and recommendation synthesis of guidelines and consensuses for interventions of pressure ulcers: A protocol for systematic review |
title_fullStr | Appraisal and recommendation synthesis of guidelines and consensuses for interventions of pressure ulcers: A protocol for systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Appraisal and recommendation synthesis of guidelines and consensuses for interventions of pressure ulcers: A protocol for systematic review |
title_short | Appraisal and recommendation synthesis of guidelines and consensuses for interventions of pressure ulcers: A protocol for systematic review |
title_sort | appraisal and recommendation synthesis of guidelines and consensuses for interventions of pressure ulcers: a protocol for systematic review |
topic | 3900 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32481344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020417 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gengjie appraisalandrecommendationsynthesisofguidelinesandconsensusesforinterventionsofpressureulcersaprotocolforsystematicreview AT yangkelu appraisalandrecommendationsynthesisofguidelinesandconsensusesforinterventionsofpressureulcersaprotocolforsystematicreview AT caiyitong appraisalandrecommendationsynthesisofguidelinesandconsensusesforinterventionsofpressureulcersaprotocolforsystematicreview AT shijiyuan appraisalandrecommendationsynthesisofguidelinesandconsensusesforinterventionsofpressureulcersaprotocolforsystematicreview AT yinmin appraisalandrecommendationsynthesisofguidelinesandconsensusesforinterventionsofpressureulcersaprotocolforsystematicreview AT wangxiaoping appraisalandrecommendationsynthesisofguidelinesandconsensusesforinterventionsofpressureulcersaprotocolforsystematicreview |