Cargando…

Clinical evidence for repurposing chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as antiviral agents: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Repurposing hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine (CQ) as antiviral agents is a re-emerging topic with the advent of new viral epidemics. AIMS: To summarize evidence from human clinical studies for using HCQ or CQ as antiviral agents for any viral infection. SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodrigo, C., Fernando, S.D., Rajapakse, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7250111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32470568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.05.016
_version_ 1783538713597313024
author Rodrigo, C.
Fernando, S.D.
Rajapakse, S.
author_facet Rodrigo, C.
Fernando, S.D.
Rajapakse, S.
author_sort Rodrigo, C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Repurposing hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine (CQ) as antiviral agents is a re-emerging topic with the advent of new viral epidemics. AIMS: To summarize evidence from human clinical studies for using HCQ or CQ as antiviral agents for any viral infection. SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science for published studies without time or language restrictions; Cochrane Clinical Trial Registry and Chinese Clinical Trials Registry for trials registered after 2015; MedRxiv for preprints within the last 12 months. CONTENT: Study eligibility criteria were interventional and prospective observational studies (with or without a control group). Participants were adults and children with a confirmed viral infection. Interventions included the use of CQ or HCQ as antiviral agent in one or more groups of the study. Two authors independently screened abstracts, and all authors agreed on eligible studies. A meta-analysis was planned if studies were available which were similar in terms of participants, intervention, comparator and outcomes. Nineteen studies (including two preprints) were eligible (HIV 8, HCV 2, dengue 2, chikungunya 1, COVID-19 6). Nine and ten studies assessed CQ and HCQ respectively. Benefits of either drug for viral load suppression in HIV are inconsistent. CQ is ineffective in curing dengue (high-certainty evidence) and may have little or no benefit in curing chikungunya (low-certainty evidence). The evidence for COVID-19 infection is rapidly evolving but at this stage we are unsure whether either CQ or HCQ has any benefit in clearing viraemia (very-low-certainty evidence). IMPLICATIONS: Using HCQ or CQ for HIV/HCV infections is now clinically irrelevant as other effective antivirals are available for viral load suppression (HIV) and cure (HCV). There is no benefit of CQ in dengue, and the same conclusion is likely for chikungunya. More evidence is needed to confirm whether either HCQ or CQ is beneficial in COVID-19 infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7250111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72501112020-05-27 Clinical evidence for repurposing chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as antiviral agents: a systematic review Rodrigo, C. Fernando, S.D. Rajapakse, S. Clin Microbiol Infect Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Repurposing hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine (CQ) as antiviral agents is a re-emerging topic with the advent of new viral epidemics. AIMS: To summarize evidence from human clinical studies for using HCQ or CQ as antiviral agents for any viral infection. SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science for published studies without time or language restrictions; Cochrane Clinical Trial Registry and Chinese Clinical Trials Registry for trials registered after 2015; MedRxiv for preprints within the last 12 months. CONTENT: Study eligibility criteria were interventional and prospective observational studies (with or without a control group). Participants were adults and children with a confirmed viral infection. Interventions included the use of CQ or HCQ as antiviral agent in one or more groups of the study. Two authors independently screened abstracts, and all authors agreed on eligible studies. A meta-analysis was planned if studies were available which were similar in terms of participants, intervention, comparator and outcomes. Nineteen studies (including two preprints) were eligible (HIV 8, HCV 2, dengue 2, chikungunya 1, COVID-19 6). Nine and ten studies assessed CQ and HCQ respectively. Benefits of either drug for viral load suppression in HIV are inconsistent. CQ is ineffective in curing dengue (high-certainty evidence) and may have little or no benefit in curing chikungunya (low-certainty evidence). The evidence for COVID-19 infection is rapidly evolving but at this stage we are unsure whether either CQ or HCQ has any benefit in clearing viraemia (very-low-certainty evidence). IMPLICATIONS: Using HCQ or CQ for HIV/HCV infections is now clinically irrelevant as other effective antivirals are available for viral load suppression (HIV) and cure (HCV). There is no benefit of CQ in dengue, and the same conclusion is likely for chikungunya. More evidence is needed to confirm whether either HCQ or CQ is beneficial in COVID-19 infection. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2020-08 2020-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7250111/ /pubmed/32470568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.05.016 Text en © 2020 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Rodrigo, C.
Fernando, S.D.
Rajapakse, S.
Clinical evidence for repurposing chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as antiviral agents: a systematic review
title Clinical evidence for repurposing chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as antiviral agents: a systematic review
title_full Clinical evidence for repurposing chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as antiviral agents: a systematic review
title_fullStr Clinical evidence for repurposing chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as antiviral agents: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evidence for repurposing chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as antiviral agents: a systematic review
title_short Clinical evidence for repurposing chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as antiviral agents: a systematic review
title_sort clinical evidence for repurposing chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as antiviral agents: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7250111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32470568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.05.016
work_keys_str_mv AT rodrigoc clinicalevidenceforrepurposingchloroquineandhydroxychloroquineasantiviralagentsasystematicreview
AT fernandosd clinicalevidenceforrepurposingchloroquineandhydroxychloroquineasantiviralagentsasystematicreview
AT rajapakses clinicalevidenceforrepurposingchloroquineandhydroxychloroquineasantiviralagentsasystematicreview