Cargando…
Systematic review of prediction models in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis
The natural history of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is variable and prediction of individual prognosis challenging. The inability to reliably predict prognosis at diagnosis has important implications for informed decision making especially in relation to disease modifying therapies....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7250448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32453803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233575 |
_version_ | 1783538766264139776 |
---|---|
author | Brown, Fraser S. Glasmacher, Stella A. Kearns, Patrick K. A. MacDougall, Niall Hunt, David Connick, Peter Chandran, Siddharthan |
author_facet | Brown, Fraser S. Glasmacher, Stella A. Kearns, Patrick K. A. MacDougall, Niall Hunt, David Connick, Peter Chandran, Siddharthan |
author_sort | Brown, Fraser S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The natural history of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is variable and prediction of individual prognosis challenging. The inability to reliably predict prognosis at diagnosis has important implications for informed decision making especially in relation to disease modifying therapies. We conducted a systematic review in order to collate, describe and assess the methodological quality of published prediction models in RRMS. We searched Medline, Embase and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full text for eligibility and assessed risk of bias. Studies reporting development or validation of prediction models for RRMS in adults were included. Data collection was guided by the checklist for critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews (CHARMS) and applicability and methodological quality assessment by the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST). 30 studies were included in the review. Applicability was assessed as high risk of concern in 27 studies. Risk of bias was assessed as high for all studies. The single most frequently included predictor was baseline EDSS (n = 11). T2 Lesion volume or number and brain atrophy were each retained in seven studies. Five studies included external validation and none included impact analysis. Although a number of prediction models for RRMS have been reported, most are at high risk of bias and lack external validation and impact analysis, restricting their application to routine clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7250448 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72504482020-06-08 Systematic review of prediction models in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis Brown, Fraser S. Glasmacher, Stella A. Kearns, Patrick K. A. MacDougall, Niall Hunt, David Connick, Peter Chandran, Siddharthan PLoS One Research Article The natural history of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is variable and prediction of individual prognosis challenging. The inability to reliably predict prognosis at diagnosis has important implications for informed decision making especially in relation to disease modifying therapies. We conducted a systematic review in order to collate, describe and assess the methodological quality of published prediction models in RRMS. We searched Medline, Embase and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full text for eligibility and assessed risk of bias. Studies reporting development or validation of prediction models for RRMS in adults were included. Data collection was guided by the checklist for critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews (CHARMS) and applicability and methodological quality assessment by the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST). 30 studies were included in the review. Applicability was assessed as high risk of concern in 27 studies. Risk of bias was assessed as high for all studies. The single most frequently included predictor was baseline EDSS (n = 11). T2 Lesion volume or number and brain atrophy were each retained in seven studies. Five studies included external validation and none included impact analysis. Although a number of prediction models for RRMS have been reported, most are at high risk of bias and lack external validation and impact analysis, restricting their application to routine clinical practice. Public Library of Science 2020-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7250448/ /pubmed/32453803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233575 Text en © 2020 Brown et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Brown, Fraser S. Glasmacher, Stella A. Kearns, Patrick K. A. MacDougall, Niall Hunt, David Connick, Peter Chandran, Siddharthan Systematic review of prediction models in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis |
title | Systematic review of prediction models in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis |
title_full | Systematic review of prediction models in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis |
title_fullStr | Systematic review of prediction models in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic review of prediction models in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis |
title_short | Systematic review of prediction models in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis |
title_sort | systematic review of prediction models in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7250448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32453803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233575 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brownfrasers systematicreviewofpredictionmodelsinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosis AT glasmacherstellaa systematicreviewofpredictionmodelsinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosis AT kearnspatrickka systematicreviewofpredictionmodelsinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosis AT macdougallniall systematicreviewofpredictionmodelsinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosis AT huntdavid systematicreviewofpredictionmodelsinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosis AT connickpeter systematicreviewofpredictionmodelsinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosis AT chandransiddharthan systematicreviewofpredictionmodelsinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosis |