Cargando…
Quantifying what could have been – The impact of the Australian and New Zealand governments’ response to COVID-19
BACKGROUND: The Australian and New Zealand governments both initiated strict social distancing measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in late March. It remains difficult to quantify the impact this had in reducing the spread of the virus. METHODS: Bayesian structural time series model provide...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier B.V.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7250769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32507662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2020.05.003 |
_version_ | 1783538819246587904 |
---|---|
author | Varghese, Chris Xu, William |
author_facet | Varghese, Chris Xu, William |
author_sort | Varghese, Chris |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Australian and New Zealand governments both initiated strict social distancing measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in late March. It remains difficult to quantify the impact this had in reducing the spread of the virus. METHODS: Bayesian structural time series model provide a model to quantify the scenario in which these government-level interventions were not placed. Our models predict these strict social distancing measures caused a 79% and 61% reduction in the daily cases of COVID-19 across Australia and New Zealand respectively. CONCLUSION: This provides both evidence and impetus for governments considering similar measures in response to COVID-19 and other pandemics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7250769 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72507692020-05-27 Quantifying what could have been – The impact of the Australian and New Zealand governments’ response to COVID-19 Varghese, Chris Xu, William Infect Dis Health Letter to the Editor BACKGROUND: The Australian and New Zealand governments both initiated strict social distancing measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in late March. It remains difficult to quantify the impact this had in reducing the spread of the virus. METHODS: Bayesian structural time series model provide a model to quantify the scenario in which these government-level interventions were not placed. Our models predict these strict social distancing measures caused a 79% and 61% reduction in the daily cases of COVID-19 across Australia and New Zealand respectively. CONCLUSION: This provides both evidence and impetus for governments considering similar measures in response to COVID-19 and other pandemics. Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2020-11 2020-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7250769/ /pubmed/32507662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2020.05.003 Text en © 2020 Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Letter to the Editor Varghese, Chris Xu, William Quantifying what could have been – The impact of the Australian and New Zealand governments’ response to COVID-19 |
title | Quantifying what could have been – The impact of the Australian and New Zealand governments’ response to COVID-19 |
title_full | Quantifying what could have been – The impact of the Australian and New Zealand governments’ response to COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | Quantifying what could have been – The impact of the Australian and New Zealand governments’ response to COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantifying what could have been – The impact of the Australian and New Zealand governments’ response to COVID-19 |
title_short | Quantifying what could have been – The impact of the Australian and New Zealand governments’ response to COVID-19 |
title_sort | quantifying what could have been – the impact of the australian and new zealand governments’ response to covid-19 |
topic | Letter to the Editor |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7250769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32507662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2020.05.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT varghesechris quantifyingwhatcouldhavebeentheimpactoftheaustralianandnewzealandgovernmentsresponsetocovid19 AT xuwilliam quantifyingwhatcouldhavebeentheimpactoftheaustralianandnewzealandgovernmentsresponsetocovid19 |