Cargando…
Survival and disease characteristics of de novo versus recurrent metastatic breast cancer in a cohort of young patients
BACKGROUND: It is not clear how the pathology, presentation and outcome for patients who present with de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) compare with those who later develop distant metastases. DnMBC is uncommon in younger patients. We describe these differences within a cohort of young patien...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7250836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32231292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0784-z |
_version_ | 1783538834627100672 |
---|---|
author | McKenzie, Hayley S. Maishman, Tom Simmonds, Peter Durcan, Lorraine Eccles, Diana Copson, Ellen |
author_facet | McKenzie, Hayley S. Maishman, Tom Simmonds, Peter Durcan, Lorraine Eccles, Diana Copson, Ellen |
author_sort | McKenzie, Hayley S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It is not clear how the pathology, presentation and outcome for patients who present with de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) compare with those who later develop distant metastases. DnMBC is uncommon in younger patients. We describe these differences within a cohort of young patients in the United Kingdom. METHODS: Women aged 40 years or younger with a first invasive breast cancer were recruited to the prospective POSH national cohort study. Baseline clinicopathological data were collected, with annual follow-up. Overall survival (OS) and post-distant relapse-free survival (PDRS) were assessed using Kaplan–Meier curves. RESULTS: In total, 862 patients were diagnosed with metastatic disease. DnMBC prevalence was 2.6% (76/2977). Of those with initially localised disease, 27.1% (786/2901) subsequently developed a distant recurrence. Median follow-up was 11.00 years (95% CI 10.79–11.59). Patients who developed metastatic disease within 12 months had worse OS than dnMBC patients (HR 2.64; 1.84–3.77). For PDRS, dnMBC was better than all groups, including those who relapsed after 5 years. Of dnMBC patients, 1.3% had a gBRCA1, and 11.8% a gBRCA2 mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Young women with dnMBC have better PDRS than those who develop relapsed metastatic breast cancer. A gBRCA2 mutation was overrepresented in dnMBC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7250836 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72508362021-03-31 Survival and disease characteristics of de novo versus recurrent metastatic breast cancer in a cohort of young patients McKenzie, Hayley S. Maishman, Tom Simmonds, Peter Durcan, Lorraine Eccles, Diana Copson, Ellen Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: It is not clear how the pathology, presentation and outcome for patients who present with de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) compare with those who later develop distant metastases. DnMBC is uncommon in younger patients. We describe these differences within a cohort of young patients in the United Kingdom. METHODS: Women aged 40 years or younger with a first invasive breast cancer were recruited to the prospective POSH national cohort study. Baseline clinicopathological data were collected, with annual follow-up. Overall survival (OS) and post-distant relapse-free survival (PDRS) were assessed using Kaplan–Meier curves. RESULTS: In total, 862 patients were diagnosed with metastatic disease. DnMBC prevalence was 2.6% (76/2977). Of those with initially localised disease, 27.1% (786/2901) subsequently developed a distant recurrence. Median follow-up was 11.00 years (95% CI 10.79–11.59). Patients who developed metastatic disease within 12 months had worse OS than dnMBC patients (HR 2.64; 1.84–3.77). For PDRS, dnMBC was better than all groups, including those who relapsed after 5 years. Of dnMBC patients, 1.3% had a gBRCA1, and 11.8% a gBRCA2 mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Young women with dnMBC have better PDRS than those who develop relapsed metastatic breast cancer. A gBRCA2 mutation was overrepresented in dnMBC. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-03-31 2020-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7250836/ /pubmed/32231292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0784-z Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Cancer Research UK 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Note This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). |
spellingShingle | Article McKenzie, Hayley S. Maishman, Tom Simmonds, Peter Durcan, Lorraine Eccles, Diana Copson, Ellen Survival and disease characteristics of de novo versus recurrent metastatic breast cancer in a cohort of young patients |
title | Survival and disease characteristics of de novo versus recurrent metastatic breast cancer in a cohort of young patients |
title_full | Survival and disease characteristics of de novo versus recurrent metastatic breast cancer in a cohort of young patients |
title_fullStr | Survival and disease characteristics of de novo versus recurrent metastatic breast cancer in a cohort of young patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Survival and disease characteristics of de novo versus recurrent metastatic breast cancer in a cohort of young patients |
title_short | Survival and disease characteristics of de novo versus recurrent metastatic breast cancer in a cohort of young patients |
title_sort | survival and disease characteristics of de novo versus recurrent metastatic breast cancer in a cohort of young patients |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7250836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32231292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0784-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mckenziehayleys survivalanddiseasecharacteristicsofdenovoversusrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancerinacohortofyoungpatients AT maishmantom survivalanddiseasecharacteristicsofdenovoversusrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancerinacohortofyoungpatients AT simmondspeter survivalanddiseasecharacteristicsofdenovoversusrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancerinacohortofyoungpatients AT durcanlorraine survivalanddiseasecharacteristicsofdenovoversusrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancerinacohortofyoungpatients AT survivalanddiseasecharacteristicsofdenovoversusrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancerinacohortofyoungpatients AT ecclesdiana survivalanddiseasecharacteristicsofdenovoversusrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancerinacohortofyoungpatients AT copsonellen survivalanddiseasecharacteristicsofdenovoversusrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancerinacohortofyoungpatients |