Cargando…

Survival and disease characteristics of de novo versus recurrent metastatic breast cancer in a cohort of young patients

BACKGROUND: It is not clear how the pathology, presentation and outcome for patients who present with de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) compare with those who later develop distant metastases. DnMBC is uncommon in younger patients. We describe these differences within a cohort of young patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McKenzie, Hayley S., Maishman, Tom, Simmonds, Peter, Durcan, Lorraine, Eccles, Diana, Copson, Ellen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7250836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32231292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0784-z
_version_ 1783538834627100672
author McKenzie, Hayley S.
Maishman, Tom
Simmonds, Peter
Durcan, Lorraine
Eccles, Diana
Copson, Ellen
author_facet McKenzie, Hayley S.
Maishman, Tom
Simmonds, Peter
Durcan, Lorraine
Eccles, Diana
Copson, Ellen
author_sort McKenzie, Hayley S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is not clear how the pathology, presentation and outcome for patients who present with de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) compare with those who later develop distant metastases. DnMBC is uncommon in younger patients. We describe these differences within a cohort of young patients in the United Kingdom. METHODS: Women aged 40 years or younger with a first invasive breast cancer were recruited to the prospective POSH national cohort study. Baseline clinicopathological data were collected, with annual follow-up. Overall survival (OS) and post-distant relapse-free survival (PDRS) were assessed using Kaplan–Meier curves. RESULTS: In total, 862 patients were diagnosed with metastatic disease. DnMBC prevalence was 2.6% (76/2977). Of those with initially localised disease, 27.1% (786/2901) subsequently developed a distant recurrence. Median follow-up was 11.00 years (95% CI 10.79–11.59). Patients who developed metastatic disease within 12 months had worse OS than dnMBC patients (HR 2.64; 1.84–3.77). For PDRS, dnMBC was better than all groups, including those who relapsed after 5 years. Of dnMBC patients, 1.3% had a gBRCA1, and 11.8% a gBRCA2 mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Young women with dnMBC have better PDRS than those who develop relapsed metastatic breast cancer. A gBRCA2 mutation was overrepresented in dnMBC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7250836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72508362021-03-31 Survival and disease characteristics of de novo versus recurrent metastatic breast cancer in a cohort of young patients McKenzie, Hayley S. Maishman, Tom Simmonds, Peter Durcan, Lorraine Eccles, Diana Copson, Ellen Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: It is not clear how the pathology, presentation and outcome for patients who present with de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) compare with those who later develop distant metastases. DnMBC is uncommon in younger patients. We describe these differences within a cohort of young patients in the United Kingdom. METHODS: Women aged 40 years or younger with a first invasive breast cancer were recruited to the prospective POSH national cohort study. Baseline clinicopathological data were collected, with annual follow-up. Overall survival (OS) and post-distant relapse-free survival (PDRS) were assessed using Kaplan–Meier curves. RESULTS: In total, 862 patients were diagnosed with metastatic disease. DnMBC prevalence was 2.6% (76/2977). Of those with initially localised disease, 27.1% (786/2901) subsequently developed a distant recurrence. Median follow-up was 11.00 years (95% CI 10.79–11.59). Patients who developed metastatic disease within 12 months had worse OS than dnMBC patients (HR 2.64; 1.84–3.77). For PDRS, dnMBC was better than all groups, including those who relapsed after 5 years. Of dnMBC patients, 1.3% had a gBRCA1, and 11.8% a gBRCA2 mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Young women with dnMBC have better PDRS than those who develop relapsed metastatic breast cancer. A gBRCA2 mutation was overrepresented in dnMBC. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-03-31 2020-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7250836/ /pubmed/32231292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0784-z Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Cancer Research UK 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Note This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
spellingShingle Article
McKenzie, Hayley S.
Maishman, Tom
Simmonds, Peter
Durcan, Lorraine
Eccles, Diana
Copson, Ellen
Survival and disease characteristics of de novo versus recurrent metastatic breast cancer in a cohort of young patients
title Survival and disease characteristics of de novo versus recurrent metastatic breast cancer in a cohort of young patients
title_full Survival and disease characteristics of de novo versus recurrent metastatic breast cancer in a cohort of young patients
title_fullStr Survival and disease characteristics of de novo versus recurrent metastatic breast cancer in a cohort of young patients
title_full_unstemmed Survival and disease characteristics of de novo versus recurrent metastatic breast cancer in a cohort of young patients
title_short Survival and disease characteristics of de novo versus recurrent metastatic breast cancer in a cohort of young patients
title_sort survival and disease characteristics of de novo versus recurrent metastatic breast cancer in a cohort of young patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7250836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32231292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0784-z
work_keys_str_mv AT mckenziehayleys survivalanddiseasecharacteristicsofdenovoversusrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancerinacohortofyoungpatients
AT maishmantom survivalanddiseasecharacteristicsofdenovoversusrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancerinacohortofyoungpatients
AT simmondspeter survivalanddiseasecharacteristicsofdenovoversusrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancerinacohortofyoungpatients
AT durcanlorraine survivalanddiseasecharacteristicsofdenovoversusrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancerinacohortofyoungpatients
AT survivalanddiseasecharacteristicsofdenovoversusrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancerinacohortofyoungpatients
AT ecclesdiana survivalanddiseasecharacteristicsofdenovoversusrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancerinacohortofyoungpatients
AT copsonellen survivalanddiseasecharacteristicsofdenovoversusrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancerinacohortofyoungpatients