Cargando…

Determining the effectiveness of fibrin sealants in reducing complications in patients undergoing lateral neck dissection (DEFeND): study protocol for a randomised external pilot trial

BACKGROUND: Complications after major surgery are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Neck dissection is one of the most commonly performed major operations in Head and Neck Surgical Oncology. Significant surgical complications occur in approximately 10–20% of all patients, increasing to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bajwa, Mandeep S., Carruthers, Stacey, Hanson, Rob, Jackson, Richard, Braithwaite, Chris, Edwards, Mike, Chauhan, Seema, Smith, Catrin Tudur, Shaw, Richard J., Schache, Andrew G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7251660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32509321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00618-w
_version_ 1783538999370973184
author Bajwa, Mandeep S.
Carruthers, Stacey
Hanson, Rob
Jackson, Richard
Braithwaite, Chris
Edwards, Mike
Chauhan, Seema
Smith, Catrin Tudur
Shaw, Richard J.
Schache, Andrew G.
author_facet Bajwa, Mandeep S.
Carruthers, Stacey
Hanson, Rob
Jackson, Richard
Braithwaite, Chris
Edwards, Mike
Chauhan, Seema
Smith, Catrin Tudur
Shaw, Richard J.
Schache, Andrew G.
author_sort Bajwa, Mandeep S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Complications after major surgery are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Neck dissection is one of the most commonly performed major operations in Head and Neck Surgical Oncology. Significant surgical complications occur in approximately 10–20% of all patients, increasing to 40% in patients who have had previous treatment to the area or have multiple co-morbidities and/or polypharmacy. Current evidence suggests that fibrin sealants (FS) may have potential clinical advantages in Head and Neck Surgery through the reduction of complications, volume of wound drainage and retention time of the drains. However, a paucity of high-quality trial-based evidence means that a surgical trial to determine the effectiveness of FS in reducing the rate and severity of complications in patients undergoing lateral neck dissection is warranted. The DEFeND randomised external pilot trial will address critical questions on how well key components of the proposed study design work together as well as the feasibility of a future phase III trial. METHODS: The study design that is being piloted is that of a two-arm, parallel group, superiority trial with block randomisation in a 1:1 allocation ratio. The interventional arm will constitute the application of FS (Artiss, Baxter Healthcare Ltd.) to the surgical wound following completion of a neck dissection procedure, in addition to standard of care (SOC). The control arm will constitute SOC alone. Eligible patients will include patients who require a lateral neck dissection with a minimum of three cervical nodal levels. Patients who require bilateral neck procedures or undergoing immediate reconstruction with free or regional flaps will be excluded. The outcomes being assessed will be recruitment rate, screened to randomisation rate, fidelity of blinding process using blinding indices, number of missing or incomplete data entries, number of protocol deviations and number of losses to follow-up. Suitability of the outcome measures proposed for the future phase III trial will also be assessed. DISCUSSION: The anticipated challenges for this study will be recruitment, complexity of the intervention and adherence to the protocol. The outcomes will inform the design, feasibility and conduct of a future phase III surgical trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: First participant randomised: November 06, 2018; UKCRN Portfolio ID: 37896; ISRCTN99181100.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7251660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72516602020-06-04 Determining the effectiveness of fibrin sealants in reducing complications in patients undergoing lateral neck dissection (DEFeND): study protocol for a randomised external pilot trial Bajwa, Mandeep S. Carruthers, Stacey Hanson, Rob Jackson, Richard Braithwaite, Chris Edwards, Mike Chauhan, Seema Smith, Catrin Tudur Shaw, Richard J. Schache, Andrew G. Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Complications after major surgery are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Neck dissection is one of the most commonly performed major operations in Head and Neck Surgical Oncology. Significant surgical complications occur in approximately 10–20% of all patients, increasing to 40% in patients who have had previous treatment to the area or have multiple co-morbidities and/or polypharmacy. Current evidence suggests that fibrin sealants (FS) may have potential clinical advantages in Head and Neck Surgery through the reduction of complications, volume of wound drainage and retention time of the drains. However, a paucity of high-quality trial-based evidence means that a surgical trial to determine the effectiveness of FS in reducing the rate and severity of complications in patients undergoing lateral neck dissection is warranted. The DEFeND randomised external pilot trial will address critical questions on how well key components of the proposed study design work together as well as the feasibility of a future phase III trial. METHODS: The study design that is being piloted is that of a two-arm, parallel group, superiority trial with block randomisation in a 1:1 allocation ratio. The interventional arm will constitute the application of FS (Artiss, Baxter Healthcare Ltd.) to the surgical wound following completion of a neck dissection procedure, in addition to standard of care (SOC). The control arm will constitute SOC alone. Eligible patients will include patients who require a lateral neck dissection with a minimum of three cervical nodal levels. Patients who require bilateral neck procedures or undergoing immediate reconstruction with free or regional flaps will be excluded. The outcomes being assessed will be recruitment rate, screened to randomisation rate, fidelity of blinding process using blinding indices, number of missing or incomplete data entries, number of protocol deviations and number of losses to follow-up. Suitability of the outcome measures proposed for the future phase III trial will also be assessed. DISCUSSION: The anticipated challenges for this study will be recruitment, complexity of the intervention and adherence to the protocol. The outcomes will inform the design, feasibility and conduct of a future phase III surgical trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: First participant randomised: November 06, 2018; UKCRN Portfolio ID: 37896; ISRCTN99181100. BioMed Central 2020-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7251660/ /pubmed/32509321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00618-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Bajwa, Mandeep S.
Carruthers, Stacey
Hanson, Rob
Jackson, Richard
Braithwaite, Chris
Edwards, Mike
Chauhan, Seema
Smith, Catrin Tudur
Shaw, Richard J.
Schache, Andrew G.
Determining the effectiveness of fibrin sealants in reducing complications in patients undergoing lateral neck dissection (DEFeND): study protocol for a randomised external pilot trial
title Determining the effectiveness of fibrin sealants in reducing complications in patients undergoing lateral neck dissection (DEFeND): study protocol for a randomised external pilot trial
title_full Determining the effectiveness of fibrin sealants in reducing complications in patients undergoing lateral neck dissection (DEFeND): study protocol for a randomised external pilot trial
title_fullStr Determining the effectiveness of fibrin sealants in reducing complications in patients undergoing lateral neck dissection (DEFeND): study protocol for a randomised external pilot trial
title_full_unstemmed Determining the effectiveness of fibrin sealants in reducing complications in patients undergoing lateral neck dissection (DEFeND): study protocol for a randomised external pilot trial
title_short Determining the effectiveness of fibrin sealants in reducing complications in patients undergoing lateral neck dissection (DEFeND): study protocol for a randomised external pilot trial
title_sort determining the effectiveness of fibrin sealants in reducing complications in patients undergoing lateral neck dissection (defend): study protocol for a randomised external pilot trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7251660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32509321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00618-w
work_keys_str_mv AT bajwamandeeps determiningtheeffectivenessoffibrinsealantsinreducingcomplicationsinpatientsundergoinglateralneckdissectiondefendstudyprotocolforarandomisedexternalpilottrial
AT carruthersstacey determiningtheeffectivenessoffibrinsealantsinreducingcomplicationsinpatientsundergoinglateralneckdissectiondefendstudyprotocolforarandomisedexternalpilottrial
AT hansonrob determiningtheeffectivenessoffibrinsealantsinreducingcomplicationsinpatientsundergoinglateralneckdissectiondefendstudyprotocolforarandomisedexternalpilottrial
AT jacksonrichard determiningtheeffectivenessoffibrinsealantsinreducingcomplicationsinpatientsundergoinglateralneckdissectiondefendstudyprotocolforarandomisedexternalpilottrial
AT braithwaitechris determiningtheeffectivenessoffibrinsealantsinreducingcomplicationsinpatientsundergoinglateralneckdissectiondefendstudyprotocolforarandomisedexternalpilottrial
AT edwardsmike determiningtheeffectivenessoffibrinsealantsinreducingcomplicationsinpatientsundergoinglateralneckdissectiondefendstudyprotocolforarandomisedexternalpilottrial
AT chauhanseema determiningtheeffectivenessoffibrinsealantsinreducingcomplicationsinpatientsundergoinglateralneckdissectiondefendstudyprotocolforarandomisedexternalpilottrial
AT smithcatrintudur determiningtheeffectivenessoffibrinsealantsinreducingcomplicationsinpatientsundergoinglateralneckdissectiondefendstudyprotocolforarandomisedexternalpilottrial
AT shawrichardj determiningtheeffectivenessoffibrinsealantsinreducingcomplicationsinpatientsundergoinglateralneckdissectiondefendstudyprotocolforarandomisedexternalpilottrial
AT schacheandrewg determiningtheeffectivenessoffibrinsealantsinreducingcomplicationsinpatientsundergoinglateralneckdissectiondefendstudyprotocolforarandomisedexternalpilottrial