Cargando…

Predicting the occurrence of venous thromboembolism: construction and verification of risk warning model

BACKGROUND: The onset of venous thromboembolism is insidious and the prognosis is poor. In this study, we aimed to construct a VTE risk warning model and testified its clinical application value. METHODS: Preliminary construction of the VTE risk warning model was carried out according to the indepen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shen, Chen, Ge, Binqian, Liu, Xiaoqin, Chen, Hao, Qin, Yi, Shen, Hongwu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7251685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32460701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01519-9
_version_ 1783539004990291968
author Shen, Chen
Ge, Binqian
Liu, Xiaoqin
Chen, Hao
Qin, Yi
Shen, Hongwu
author_facet Shen, Chen
Ge, Binqian
Liu, Xiaoqin
Chen, Hao
Qin, Yi
Shen, Hongwu
author_sort Shen, Chen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The onset of venous thromboembolism is insidious and the prognosis is poor. In this study, we aimed to construct a VTE risk warning model and testified its clinical application value. METHODS: Preliminary construction of the VTE risk warning model was carried out according to the independent risk warning indicators of VTE screened by Logistic regression analysis. The truncated value of screening VTE was obtained and the model was evaluated. ROC curve analysis was used to compare the test of Caprini risk assessment scale and VTE risk warning model. The cut-off value of the VTE risk warning model was used to evaluate the test effectiveness of the model for VTE patients with validation data set. RESULTS: The VTE risk warning model is p = e(x) / (1+ e(x)), x = − 4.840 + 2.557 • X(10(1)) + 1.432 • X(14(1)) + 2.977 • X(15(1)) + 3.445 • X(18(1)) + 1.086 • X(25(1)) + 0.249 • X(34) + 0.282 • X(41). ROC curve results show that: AUC (95%CI), cutoff value, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Youden index, Caprini risk assessment scale is 0.596 (0.552, 0.638), 5, 26.07, 96.50, 61.3%, 0.226, VTE risk warning model is 0.960 (0.940, 0.976), 0.438, 92.61, 91.83, 92.2%, 0.844, respectively, with statistically significant differences (Z = 14.521, P < 0.0001). The accuracy and Youden index of VTE screening using VTE risk warning model were 81.8 and 62.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: VTE risk warning model had high accuracy in predicting VTE occurrence in hospitalized patients. Its test performance was better than Caprini risk assessment scale. It also had high test performance in external population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7251685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72516852020-06-04 Predicting the occurrence of venous thromboembolism: construction and verification of risk warning model Shen, Chen Ge, Binqian Liu, Xiaoqin Chen, Hao Qin, Yi Shen, Hongwu BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The onset of venous thromboembolism is insidious and the prognosis is poor. In this study, we aimed to construct a VTE risk warning model and testified its clinical application value. METHODS: Preliminary construction of the VTE risk warning model was carried out according to the independent risk warning indicators of VTE screened by Logistic regression analysis. The truncated value of screening VTE was obtained and the model was evaluated. ROC curve analysis was used to compare the test of Caprini risk assessment scale and VTE risk warning model. The cut-off value of the VTE risk warning model was used to evaluate the test effectiveness of the model for VTE patients with validation data set. RESULTS: The VTE risk warning model is p = e(x) / (1+ e(x)), x = − 4.840 + 2.557 • X(10(1)) + 1.432 • X(14(1)) + 2.977 • X(15(1)) + 3.445 • X(18(1)) + 1.086 • X(25(1)) + 0.249 • X(34) + 0.282 • X(41). ROC curve results show that: AUC (95%CI), cutoff value, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Youden index, Caprini risk assessment scale is 0.596 (0.552, 0.638), 5, 26.07, 96.50, 61.3%, 0.226, VTE risk warning model is 0.960 (0.940, 0.976), 0.438, 92.61, 91.83, 92.2%, 0.844, respectively, with statistically significant differences (Z = 14.521, P < 0.0001). The accuracy and Youden index of VTE screening using VTE risk warning model were 81.8 and 62.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: VTE risk warning model had high accuracy in predicting VTE occurrence in hospitalized patients. Its test performance was better than Caprini risk assessment scale. It also had high test performance in external population. BioMed Central 2020-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7251685/ /pubmed/32460701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01519-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shen, Chen
Ge, Binqian
Liu, Xiaoqin
Chen, Hao
Qin, Yi
Shen, Hongwu
Predicting the occurrence of venous thromboembolism: construction and verification of risk warning model
title Predicting the occurrence of venous thromboembolism: construction and verification of risk warning model
title_full Predicting the occurrence of venous thromboembolism: construction and verification of risk warning model
title_fullStr Predicting the occurrence of venous thromboembolism: construction and verification of risk warning model
title_full_unstemmed Predicting the occurrence of venous thromboembolism: construction and verification of risk warning model
title_short Predicting the occurrence of venous thromboembolism: construction and verification of risk warning model
title_sort predicting the occurrence of venous thromboembolism: construction and verification of risk warning model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7251685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32460701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01519-9
work_keys_str_mv AT shenchen predictingtheoccurrenceofvenousthromboembolismconstructionandverificationofriskwarningmodel
AT gebinqian predictingtheoccurrenceofvenousthromboembolismconstructionandverificationofriskwarningmodel
AT liuxiaoqin predictingtheoccurrenceofvenousthromboembolismconstructionandverificationofriskwarningmodel
AT chenhao predictingtheoccurrenceofvenousthromboembolismconstructionandverificationofriskwarningmodel
AT qinyi predictingtheoccurrenceofvenousthromboembolismconstructionandverificationofriskwarningmodel
AT shenhongwu predictingtheoccurrenceofvenousthromboembolismconstructionandverificationofriskwarningmodel