Cargando…

Trends in Subcutaneous Cardiac Monitoring Technology

Ambulatory cardiac monitoring is a rapidly expanding field and one that is likely to progress beyond electrocardiographic (ECG) and blood pressure recordings. To date, the primary cardiac monitoring focus has been ambulatory ECG (AECG) monitoring. In this setting, AECG monitoring has become a diagno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kohno, Ritsuko, Nantsupawat, Teerapat, Benditt, David G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MediaSphere Medical 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7252872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32494499
http://dx.doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2018.090703
_version_ 1783539239717175296
author Kohno, Ritsuko
Nantsupawat, Teerapat
Benditt, David G.
author_facet Kohno, Ritsuko
Nantsupawat, Teerapat
Benditt, David G.
author_sort Kohno, Ritsuko
collection PubMed
description Ambulatory cardiac monitoring is a rapidly expanding field and one that is likely to progress beyond electrocardiographic (ECG) and blood pressure recordings. To date, the primary cardiac monitoring focus has been ambulatory ECG (AECG) monitoring. In this setting, AECG monitoring has become a diagnostic tool used daily by physicians of many specialties. In this regard, both wearable and subcutaneous ECG monitoring technologies are now widely available, with the appropriate choice for a given patient being best determined by the frequency with which the patient’s symptom recurrences are expected. In other words, the less frequent the symptomatic events, then the longer the monitoring duration requirement should be. However, multiple factors other than the technology used impact success. For example, wearable AECG systems are only capable of monitoring patients for a period of a few days to several weeks due to limited battery longevity, patient intolerance to cutaneous ECG electrodes, the cumbersome nature of the device, or a combination of these factors. Current-generation insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs), on the other hand, offer three years of monitoring and infrequent skin irritation. Additionally, automatic remote download, a valuable feature in many cases, is only offered by certain wearable technologies, but is an option in all currently available ICMs. This report focuses on the current status of subcutaneous ICMs and their indications and limitations. The goal is to highlight the variety of utility of current ICM technologies and to provide insight into potential future subcutaneous ICM applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7252872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MediaSphere Medical
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72528722020-06-02 Trends in Subcutaneous Cardiac Monitoring Technology Kohno, Ritsuko Nantsupawat, Teerapat Benditt, David G. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag Research Review Ambulatory cardiac monitoring is a rapidly expanding field and one that is likely to progress beyond electrocardiographic (ECG) and blood pressure recordings. To date, the primary cardiac monitoring focus has been ambulatory ECG (AECG) monitoring. In this setting, AECG monitoring has become a diagnostic tool used daily by physicians of many specialties. In this regard, both wearable and subcutaneous ECG monitoring technologies are now widely available, with the appropriate choice for a given patient being best determined by the frequency with which the patient’s symptom recurrences are expected. In other words, the less frequent the symptomatic events, then the longer the monitoring duration requirement should be. However, multiple factors other than the technology used impact success. For example, wearable AECG systems are only capable of monitoring patients for a period of a few days to several weeks due to limited battery longevity, patient intolerance to cutaneous ECG electrodes, the cumbersome nature of the device, or a combination of these factors. Current-generation insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs), on the other hand, offer three years of monitoring and infrequent skin irritation. Additionally, automatic remote download, a valuable feature in many cases, is only offered by certain wearable technologies, but is an option in all currently available ICMs. This report focuses on the current status of subcutaneous ICMs and their indications and limitations. The goal is to highlight the variety of utility of current ICM technologies and to provide insight into potential future subcutaneous ICM applications. MediaSphere Medical 2018-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7252872/ /pubmed/32494499 http://dx.doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2018.090703 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Review
Kohno, Ritsuko
Nantsupawat, Teerapat
Benditt, David G.
Trends in Subcutaneous Cardiac Monitoring Technology
title Trends in Subcutaneous Cardiac Monitoring Technology
title_full Trends in Subcutaneous Cardiac Monitoring Technology
title_fullStr Trends in Subcutaneous Cardiac Monitoring Technology
title_full_unstemmed Trends in Subcutaneous Cardiac Monitoring Technology
title_short Trends in Subcutaneous Cardiac Monitoring Technology
title_sort trends in subcutaneous cardiac monitoring technology
topic Research Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7252872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32494499
http://dx.doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2018.090703
work_keys_str_mv AT kohnoritsuko trendsinsubcutaneouscardiacmonitoringtechnology
AT nantsupawatteerapat trendsinsubcutaneouscardiacmonitoringtechnology
AT bendittdavidg trendsinsubcutaneouscardiacmonitoringtechnology