Cargando…
Confluent Extended Posterior Left Atrial Wall Ablation: Thinking Inside the Box
Here, we report intermediate follow-up details after using a technique of confluent posterior left atrial wall epicardial ablation designed to eliminate both existing and future atrial fibrillation (AF) substrates. The method is part of the Convergent hybrid procedure for AF ablation. In this study,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MediaSphere Medical
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7252930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32494458 http://dx.doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2017.080704 |
_version_ | 1783539251070107648 |
---|---|
author | Clive Robinson, M. Scierka, Lindsey Chiravuri, Murali Winslow, Robert Squitieri, Rafael Dimeo, Albert Feinn, Richard Tiano, Joseph J. Mcpherson, Craig |
author_facet | Clive Robinson, M. Scierka, Lindsey Chiravuri, Murali Winslow, Robert Squitieri, Rafael Dimeo, Albert Feinn, Richard Tiano, Joseph J. Mcpherson, Craig |
author_sort | Clive Robinson, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Here, we report intermediate follow-up details after using a technique of confluent posterior left atrial wall epicardial ablation designed to eliminate both existing and future atrial fibrillation (AF) substrates. The method is part of the Convergent hybrid procedure for AF ablation. In this study, multiple confluent epicardial ablations with radiofrequency energy were delivered, spanning the vertical and transverse dimensions of the posterior left atrium, along with facilitated pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Endocardial mapping and ablation were performed to complete PVI and to ablate the cavotricuspid isthmus. All patients were followed clinically and using two-to-four weeks of continuous monitoring at six, 12, and 24 months, respectively. The average length of follow-up was 488 days. Of the 57 largely unselected patients with persistent or longstanding persistent AF (NPAF), mean duration of AF was 5.6 years. Single procedure freedom from AF through 24 months was 64.5%, and that for all arrhythmias, was 58.9%. Sixty-eight percent of patients were off antiarrhythmic drugs. Four patients (7%) required a second endocardial ablation procedure. A sub-analysis of the observed arrhythmia burden present through follow-up showed this to be small (ie, <1%) in the majority of patients involved in this study. In conclusion, the extended posterior left atrial wall ablation technique discussed here, as part of the Convergent hybrid method, achieved notable single-procedure success in a particularly challenging series of patients with NPAF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7252930 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MediaSphere Medical |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72529302020-06-02 Confluent Extended Posterior Left Atrial Wall Ablation: Thinking Inside the Box Clive Robinson, M. Scierka, Lindsey Chiravuri, Murali Winslow, Robert Squitieri, Rafael Dimeo, Albert Feinn, Richard Tiano, Joseph J. Mcpherson, Craig J Innov Card Rhythm Manag Original Research Here, we report intermediate follow-up details after using a technique of confluent posterior left atrial wall epicardial ablation designed to eliminate both existing and future atrial fibrillation (AF) substrates. The method is part of the Convergent hybrid procedure for AF ablation. In this study, multiple confluent epicardial ablations with radiofrequency energy were delivered, spanning the vertical and transverse dimensions of the posterior left atrium, along with facilitated pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Endocardial mapping and ablation were performed to complete PVI and to ablate the cavotricuspid isthmus. All patients were followed clinically and using two-to-four weeks of continuous monitoring at six, 12, and 24 months, respectively. The average length of follow-up was 488 days. Of the 57 largely unselected patients with persistent or longstanding persistent AF (NPAF), mean duration of AF was 5.6 years. Single procedure freedom from AF through 24 months was 64.5%, and that for all arrhythmias, was 58.9%. Sixty-eight percent of patients were off antiarrhythmic drugs. Four patients (7%) required a second endocardial ablation procedure. A sub-analysis of the observed arrhythmia burden present through follow-up showed this to be small (ie, <1%) in the majority of patients involved in this study. In conclusion, the extended posterior left atrial wall ablation technique discussed here, as part of the Convergent hybrid method, achieved notable single-procedure success in a particularly challenging series of patients with NPAF. MediaSphere Medical 2017-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7252930/ /pubmed/32494458 http://dx.doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2017.080704 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Clive Robinson, M. Scierka, Lindsey Chiravuri, Murali Winslow, Robert Squitieri, Rafael Dimeo, Albert Feinn, Richard Tiano, Joseph J. Mcpherson, Craig Confluent Extended Posterior Left Atrial Wall Ablation: Thinking Inside the Box |
title | Confluent Extended Posterior Left Atrial Wall Ablation: Thinking Inside the Box |
title_full | Confluent Extended Posterior Left Atrial Wall Ablation: Thinking Inside the Box |
title_fullStr | Confluent Extended Posterior Left Atrial Wall Ablation: Thinking Inside the Box |
title_full_unstemmed | Confluent Extended Posterior Left Atrial Wall Ablation: Thinking Inside the Box |
title_short | Confluent Extended Posterior Left Atrial Wall Ablation: Thinking Inside the Box |
title_sort | confluent extended posterior left atrial wall ablation: thinking inside the box |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7252930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32494458 http://dx.doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2017.080704 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cliverobinsonm confluentextendedposteriorleftatrialwallablationthinkinginsidethebox AT scierkalindsey confluentextendedposteriorleftatrialwallablationthinkinginsidethebox AT chiravurimurali confluentextendedposteriorleftatrialwallablationthinkinginsidethebox AT winslowrobert confluentextendedposteriorleftatrialwallablationthinkinginsidethebox AT squitierirafael confluentextendedposteriorleftatrialwallablationthinkinginsidethebox AT dimeoalbert confluentextendedposteriorleftatrialwallablationthinkinginsidethebox AT feinnrichard confluentextendedposteriorleftatrialwallablationthinkinginsidethebox AT tianojosephj confluentextendedposteriorleftatrialwallablationthinkinginsidethebox AT mcphersoncraig confluentextendedposteriorleftatrialwallablationthinkinginsidethebox |