Cargando…

Test of Strength: Figure-of-Eight versus Spiral Wrapping Technique for Fiberglass Casts

Pediatric fractures are a common injury, and treatment often includes cast immobilization. For pediatric patients being treated in a cast, cast damage is among the most common reasons patients return to the emergency room. The figure-of-eight wrapping technique interdigitates layers of fiberglass wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montgomery, Blake K, Storaci, Hunter W, Segovia, Nicole A, Young, Jeffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7253080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32483494
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7843
_version_ 1783539275483054080
author Montgomery, Blake K
Storaci, Hunter W
Segovia, Nicole A
Young, Jeffrey
author_facet Montgomery, Blake K
Storaci, Hunter W
Segovia, Nicole A
Young, Jeffrey
author_sort Montgomery, Blake K
collection PubMed
description Pediatric fractures are a common injury, and treatment often includes cast immobilization. For pediatric patients being treated in a cast, cast damage is among the most common reasons patients return to the emergency room. The figure-of-eight wrapping technique interdigitates layers of fiberglass which may create a stronger cast. The aim of this study was to assess the strength of the figure-of-eight wrapping technique in comparison to the spiral wrapping technique. A total of 10 casts were wrapped with a three-inch fiberglass using the spiral technique and 10 casts were wrapped using the figure-of-eight technique. Each cast was then subjected to a three-point bending test and loaded until failure using an Instron machine. The figure-of-eight technique had an average load to failure of 278.2 + 27.6 N/mm which was similar to the spiral technique’s load to failure of 281.2 + 25.4 N/mm (p=0.795). Prior to normalizing for thickness, the load to failure of the figure-of-eight technique was 949.8 + 109.5 N, which was significantly higher than the spiral technique of 868.2 + 65.1 N (p=0.038). The figure-of-eight casts were slightly thicker than the spiral casts (average 0.3 mm, p=0.004). This suggests that the thickness of the fiberglass cast may improve the strength. The figure-of-eight wrapping technique had similar biomechanical characteristics to spiral wrapping techniques. Providers should wrap in whichever technique they feel most comfortable performing as there is no difference in strength of the cast. If a stronger cast is desired, then thickness of the cast can be increased.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7253080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72530802020-05-31 Test of Strength: Figure-of-Eight versus Spiral Wrapping Technique for Fiberglass Casts Montgomery, Blake K Storaci, Hunter W Segovia, Nicole A Young, Jeffrey Cureus Pediatrics Pediatric fractures are a common injury, and treatment often includes cast immobilization. For pediatric patients being treated in a cast, cast damage is among the most common reasons patients return to the emergency room. The figure-of-eight wrapping technique interdigitates layers of fiberglass which may create a stronger cast. The aim of this study was to assess the strength of the figure-of-eight wrapping technique in comparison to the spiral wrapping technique. A total of 10 casts were wrapped with a three-inch fiberglass using the spiral technique and 10 casts were wrapped using the figure-of-eight technique. Each cast was then subjected to a three-point bending test and loaded until failure using an Instron machine. The figure-of-eight technique had an average load to failure of 278.2 + 27.6 N/mm which was similar to the spiral technique’s load to failure of 281.2 + 25.4 N/mm (p=0.795). Prior to normalizing for thickness, the load to failure of the figure-of-eight technique was 949.8 + 109.5 N, which was significantly higher than the spiral technique of 868.2 + 65.1 N (p=0.038). The figure-of-eight casts were slightly thicker than the spiral casts (average 0.3 mm, p=0.004). This suggests that the thickness of the fiberglass cast may improve the strength. The figure-of-eight wrapping technique had similar biomechanical characteristics to spiral wrapping techniques. Providers should wrap in whichever technique they feel most comfortable performing as there is no difference in strength of the cast. If a stronger cast is desired, then thickness of the cast can be increased. Cureus 2020-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7253080/ /pubmed/32483494 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7843 Text en Copyright © 2020, Montgomery et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Montgomery, Blake K
Storaci, Hunter W
Segovia, Nicole A
Young, Jeffrey
Test of Strength: Figure-of-Eight versus Spiral Wrapping Technique for Fiberglass Casts
title Test of Strength: Figure-of-Eight versus Spiral Wrapping Technique for Fiberglass Casts
title_full Test of Strength: Figure-of-Eight versus Spiral Wrapping Technique for Fiberglass Casts
title_fullStr Test of Strength: Figure-of-Eight versus Spiral Wrapping Technique for Fiberglass Casts
title_full_unstemmed Test of Strength: Figure-of-Eight versus Spiral Wrapping Technique for Fiberglass Casts
title_short Test of Strength: Figure-of-Eight versus Spiral Wrapping Technique for Fiberglass Casts
title_sort test of strength: figure-of-eight versus spiral wrapping technique for fiberglass casts
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7253080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32483494
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7843
work_keys_str_mv AT montgomeryblakek testofstrengthfigureofeightversusspiralwrappingtechniqueforfiberglasscasts
AT storacihunterw testofstrengthfigureofeightversusspiralwrappingtechniqueforfiberglasscasts
AT segovianicolea testofstrengthfigureofeightversusspiralwrappingtechniqueforfiberglasscasts
AT youngjeffrey testofstrengthfigureofeightversusspiralwrappingtechniqueforfiberglasscasts