Cargando…
Comparative Assessment of DNA Targets and Amplification Methods for Leishmania (Viannia) Detection in Human Samples
Multiple polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based approaches have been developed for Leishmania detection in clinical and laboratory samples, and this diversity limits inter-study comparisons, meta-analyses, and generalization of findings. Towards harmonization of a molecular tool for detection of Leis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7253133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32228793 http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.19-0691 |
_version_ | 1783539283236225024 |
---|---|
author | Rosales-Chilama, Mariana Diaz-Moreno, Nicole Prieto, Miguel Darío Giraldo-Parra, Lina Martínez-Valencia, Álvaro José Gomez, María Adelaida |
author_facet | Rosales-Chilama, Mariana Diaz-Moreno, Nicole Prieto, Miguel Darío Giraldo-Parra, Lina Martínez-Valencia, Álvaro José Gomez, María Adelaida |
author_sort | Rosales-Chilama, Mariana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multiple polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based approaches have been developed for Leishmania detection in clinical and laboratory samples, and this diversity limits inter-study comparisons, meta-analyses, and generalization of findings. Towards harmonization of a molecular tool for detection of Leishmania (Viannia) for research purposes, we evaluated the concordance of 18SrDNA quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and minicircle kinetoplastid DNA (mkDNA) PCR followed by Southern blot (PCR-SB) in in vitro infection systems and in lesion and mucosal swab samples from Colombian patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. (Viannia). The lower limit of parasite detection of 18SrDNA qPCR and mkDNA PCR-SB was 10(−1) promastigotes and one intracellular amastigote per reaction. From cutaneous lesions (n = 63), an almost perfect concordance was found between the methods (κ = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.82–1.00). Despite equal limits of detection, mkDNA PCR-SB was more efficient for parasite detection in mucosal samples than 18SrDNA qPCR or 18SrDNA digital droplet PCR. The high concordance, sensitivity, scaling potential, and feasibility of implementation of the 18SrDNA qPCR, support its selection as the L. (Viannia) in research laboratories, as a first step towards harmonization of research protocols in the region. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7253133 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72531332020-05-31 Comparative Assessment of DNA Targets and Amplification Methods for Leishmania (Viannia) Detection in Human Samples Rosales-Chilama, Mariana Diaz-Moreno, Nicole Prieto, Miguel Darío Giraldo-Parra, Lina Martínez-Valencia, Álvaro José Gomez, María Adelaida Am J Trop Med Hyg Articles Multiple polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based approaches have been developed for Leishmania detection in clinical and laboratory samples, and this diversity limits inter-study comparisons, meta-analyses, and generalization of findings. Towards harmonization of a molecular tool for detection of Leishmania (Viannia) for research purposes, we evaluated the concordance of 18SrDNA quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and minicircle kinetoplastid DNA (mkDNA) PCR followed by Southern blot (PCR-SB) in in vitro infection systems and in lesion and mucosal swab samples from Colombian patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. (Viannia). The lower limit of parasite detection of 18SrDNA qPCR and mkDNA PCR-SB was 10(−1) promastigotes and one intracellular amastigote per reaction. From cutaneous lesions (n = 63), an almost perfect concordance was found between the methods (κ = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.82–1.00). Despite equal limits of detection, mkDNA PCR-SB was more efficient for parasite detection in mucosal samples than 18SrDNA qPCR or 18SrDNA digital droplet PCR. The high concordance, sensitivity, scaling potential, and feasibility of implementation of the 18SrDNA qPCR, support its selection as the L. (Viannia) in research laboratories, as a first step towards harmonization of research protocols in the region. The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2020-06 2020-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7253133/ /pubmed/32228793 http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.19-0691 Text en © The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Rosales-Chilama, Mariana Diaz-Moreno, Nicole Prieto, Miguel Darío Giraldo-Parra, Lina Martínez-Valencia, Álvaro José Gomez, María Adelaida Comparative Assessment of DNA Targets and Amplification Methods for Leishmania (Viannia) Detection in Human Samples |
title | Comparative Assessment of DNA Targets and Amplification Methods for Leishmania (Viannia) Detection in Human Samples |
title_full | Comparative Assessment of DNA Targets and Amplification Methods for Leishmania (Viannia) Detection in Human Samples |
title_fullStr | Comparative Assessment of DNA Targets and Amplification Methods for Leishmania (Viannia) Detection in Human Samples |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Assessment of DNA Targets and Amplification Methods for Leishmania (Viannia) Detection in Human Samples |
title_short | Comparative Assessment of DNA Targets and Amplification Methods for Leishmania (Viannia) Detection in Human Samples |
title_sort | comparative assessment of dna targets and amplification methods for leishmania (viannia) detection in human samples |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7253133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32228793 http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.19-0691 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosaleschilamamariana comparativeassessmentofdnatargetsandamplificationmethodsforleishmaniavianniadetectioninhumansamples AT diazmorenonicole comparativeassessmentofdnatargetsandamplificationmethodsforleishmaniavianniadetectioninhumansamples AT prietomigueldario comparativeassessmentofdnatargetsandamplificationmethodsforleishmaniavianniadetectioninhumansamples AT giraldoparralina comparativeassessmentofdnatargetsandamplificationmethodsforleishmaniavianniadetectioninhumansamples AT martinezvalenciaalvarojose comparativeassessmentofdnatargetsandamplificationmethodsforleishmaniavianniadetectioninhumansamples AT gomezmariaadelaida comparativeassessmentofdnatargetsandamplificationmethodsforleishmaniavianniadetectioninhumansamples |