Cargando…

Comparative Assessment of DNA Targets and Amplification Methods for Leishmania (Viannia) Detection in Human Samples

Multiple polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based approaches have been developed for Leishmania detection in clinical and laboratory samples, and this diversity limits inter-study comparisons, meta-analyses, and generalization of findings. Towards harmonization of a molecular tool for detection of Leis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosales-Chilama, Mariana, Diaz-Moreno, Nicole, Prieto, Miguel Darío, Giraldo-Parra, Lina, Martínez-Valencia, Álvaro José, Gomez, María Adelaida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7253133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32228793
http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.19-0691
_version_ 1783539283236225024
author Rosales-Chilama, Mariana
Diaz-Moreno, Nicole
Prieto, Miguel Darío
Giraldo-Parra, Lina
Martínez-Valencia, Álvaro José
Gomez, María Adelaida
author_facet Rosales-Chilama, Mariana
Diaz-Moreno, Nicole
Prieto, Miguel Darío
Giraldo-Parra, Lina
Martínez-Valencia, Álvaro José
Gomez, María Adelaida
author_sort Rosales-Chilama, Mariana
collection PubMed
description Multiple polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based approaches have been developed for Leishmania detection in clinical and laboratory samples, and this diversity limits inter-study comparisons, meta-analyses, and generalization of findings. Towards harmonization of a molecular tool for detection of Leishmania (Viannia) for research purposes, we evaluated the concordance of 18SrDNA quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and minicircle kinetoplastid DNA (mkDNA) PCR followed by Southern blot (PCR-SB) in in vitro infection systems and in lesion and mucosal swab samples from Colombian patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. (Viannia). The lower limit of parasite detection of 18SrDNA qPCR and mkDNA PCR-SB was 10(−1) promastigotes and one intracellular amastigote per reaction. From cutaneous lesions (n = 63), an almost perfect concordance was found between the methods (κ = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.82–1.00). Despite equal limits of detection, mkDNA PCR-SB was more efficient for parasite detection in mucosal samples than 18SrDNA qPCR or 18SrDNA digital droplet PCR. The high concordance, sensitivity, scaling potential, and feasibility of implementation of the 18SrDNA qPCR, support its selection as the L. (Viannia) in research laboratories, as a first step towards harmonization of research protocols in the region.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7253133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72531332020-05-31 Comparative Assessment of DNA Targets and Amplification Methods for Leishmania (Viannia) Detection in Human Samples Rosales-Chilama, Mariana Diaz-Moreno, Nicole Prieto, Miguel Darío Giraldo-Parra, Lina Martínez-Valencia, Álvaro José Gomez, María Adelaida Am J Trop Med Hyg Articles Multiple polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based approaches have been developed for Leishmania detection in clinical and laboratory samples, and this diversity limits inter-study comparisons, meta-analyses, and generalization of findings. Towards harmonization of a molecular tool for detection of Leishmania (Viannia) for research purposes, we evaluated the concordance of 18SrDNA quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and minicircle kinetoplastid DNA (mkDNA) PCR followed by Southern blot (PCR-SB) in in vitro infection systems and in lesion and mucosal swab samples from Colombian patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. (Viannia). The lower limit of parasite detection of 18SrDNA qPCR and mkDNA PCR-SB was 10(−1) promastigotes and one intracellular amastigote per reaction. From cutaneous lesions (n = 63), an almost perfect concordance was found between the methods (κ = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.82–1.00). Despite equal limits of detection, mkDNA PCR-SB was more efficient for parasite detection in mucosal samples than 18SrDNA qPCR or 18SrDNA digital droplet PCR. The high concordance, sensitivity, scaling potential, and feasibility of implementation of the 18SrDNA qPCR, support its selection as the L. (Viannia) in research laboratories, as a first step towards harmonization of research protocols in the region. The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2020-06 2020-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7253133/ /pubmed/32228793 http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.19-0691 Text en © The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Articles
Rosales-Chilama, Mariana
Diaz-Moreno, Nicole
Prieto, Miguel Darío
Giraldo-Parra, Lina
Martínez-Valencia, Álvaro José
Gomez, María Adelaida
Comparative Assessment of DNA Targets and Amplification Methods for Leishmania (Viannia) Detection in Human Samples
title Comparative Assessment of DNA Targets and Amplification Methods for Leishmania (Viannia) Detection in Human Samples
title_full Comparative Assessment of DNA Targets and Amplification Methods for Leishmania (Viannia) Detection in Human Samples
title_fullStr Comparative Assessment of DNA Targets and Amplification Methods for Leishmania (Viannia) Detection in Human Samples
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Assessment of DNA Targets and Amplification Methods for Leishmania (Viannia) Detection in Human Samples
title_short Comparative Assessment of DNA Targets and Amplification Methods for Leishmania (Viannia) Detection in Human Samples
title_sort comparative assessment of dna targets and amplification methods for leishmania (viannia) detection in human samples
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7253133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32228793
http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.19-0691
work_keys_str_mv AT rosaleschilamamariana comparativeassessmentofdnatargetsandamplificationmethodsforleishmaniavianniadetectioninhumansamples
AT diazmorenonicole comparativeassessmentofdnatargetsandamplificationmethodsforleishmaniavianniadetectioninhumansamples
AT prietomigueldario comparativeassessmentofdnatargetsandamplificationmethodsforleishmaniavianniadetectioninhumansamples
AT giraldoparralina comparativeassessmentofdnatargetsandamplificationmethodsforleishmaniavianniadetectioninhumansamples
AT martinezvalenciaalvarojose comparativeassessmentofdnatargetsandamplificationmethodsforleishmaniavianniadetectioninhumansamples
AT gomezmariaadelaida comparativeassessmentofdnatargetsandamplificationmethodsforleishmaniavianniadetectioninhumansamples