Cargando…

Reconstruction of Upper Extremity Defects by Random Pedicle Abdominal Flaps: Is It Still a Valid Option?

Traumatic soft tissue defects of the hand and upper extremities are common and may be challenging to the reconstructive surgeon. Several reconstructive procedures such as use of local, regional, distant, and free flaps have been described. This study aimed to report the techniques, outcomes, and com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jabaiti, Samir, Ahmad, Muayyad, AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7253285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32537344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002687
_version_ 1783539315053166592
author Jabaiti, Samir
Ahmad, Muayyad
AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen
author_facet Jabaiti, Samir
Ahmad, Muayyad
AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen
author_sort Jabaiti, Samir
collection PubMed
description Traumatic soft tissue defects of the hand and upper extremities are common and may be challenging to the reconstructive surgeon. Several reconstructive procedures such as use of local, regional, distant, and free flaps have been described. This study aimed to report the techniques, outcomes, and complications of pedicle abdominal flaps in reconstructing hand and upper extremity defects. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included patients with different traumatic defects in the hand and upper extremities who underwent reconstruction by random pedicle abdominal flaps between 2002 and 2017 at Jordan University Hospital, Jordan. Data were collected and analyzed, and the variables studied included patient age and sex, etiology and size of the defect, complications, outcomes, and the need for further revision procedures. Appropriate statistical analysis was used to examine the potential factors affecting flap survival. RESULTS: We included a total of 34 patients with a mean age of 22.2 years, ranging from 1 to 54 years. Finger degloving was seen in approximately half of the patients. Flap survival rate was 85.3%. A small area of defect was the only risk factor that significantly affected the flap failure rate. CONCLUSIONS: Thin pedicle abdominal flaps are a valid, affordable, and safe option in upper extremity traumatic defects, especially in situations where microsurgical techniques are unavailable or contraindicated. Extra care should be taken when the defect surface area is small.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7253285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72532852020-06-11 Reconstruction of Upper Extremity Defects by Random Pedicle Abdominal Flaps: Is It Still a Valid Option? Jabaiti, Samir Ahmad, Muayyad AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Articles Traumatic soft tissue defects of the hand and upper extremities are common and may be challenging to the reconstructive surgeon. Several reconstructive procedures such as use of local, regional, distant, and free flaps have been described. This study aimed to report the techniques, outcomes, and complications of pedicle abdominal flaps in reconstructing hand and upper extremity defects. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included patients with different traumatic defects in the hand and upper extremities who underwent reconstruction by random pedicle abdominal flaps between 2002 and 2017 at Jordan University Hospital, Jordan. Data were collected and analyzed, and the variables studied included patient age and sex, etiology and size of the defect, complications, outcomes, and the need for further revision procedures. Appropriate statistical analysis was used to examine the potential factors affecting flap survival. RESULTS: We included a total of 34 patients with a mean age of 22.2 years, ranging from 1 to 54 years. Finger degloving was seen in approximately half of the patients. Flap survival rate was 85.3%. A small area of defect was the only risk factor that significantly affected the flap failure rate. CONCLUSIONS: Thin pedicle abdominal flaps are a valid, affordable, and safe option in upper extremity traumatic defects, especially in situations where microsurgical techniques are unavailable or contraindicated. Extra care should be taken when the defect surface area is small. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7253285/ /pubmed/32537344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002687 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Jabaiti, Samir
Ahmad, Muayyad
AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen
Reconstruction of Upper Extremity Defects by Random Pedicle Abdominal Flaps: Is It Still a Valid Option?
title Reconstruction of Upper Extremity Defects by Random Pedicle Abdominal Flaps: Is It Still a Valid Option?
title_full Reconstruction of Upper Extremity Defects by Random Pedicle Abdominal Flaps: Is It Still a Valid Option?
title_fullStr Reconstruction of Upper Extremity Defects by Random Pedicle Abdominal Flaps: Is It Still a Valid Option?
title_full_unstemmed Reconstruction of Upper Extremity Defects by Random Pedicle Abdominal Flaps: Is It Still a Valid Option?
title_short Reconstruction of Upper Extremity Defects by Random Pedicle Abdominal Flaps: Is It Still a Valid Option?
title_sort reconstruction of upper extremity defects by random pedicle abdominal flaps: is it still a valid option?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7253285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32537344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002687
work_keys_str_mv AT jabaitisamir reconstructionofupperextremitydefectsbyrandompedicleabdominalflapsisitstillavalidoption
AT ahmadmuayyad reconstructionofupperextremitydefectsbyrandompedicleabdominalflapsisitstillavalidoption
AT alryalatsaifaldeen reconstructionofupperextremitydefectsbyrandompedicleabdominalflapsisitstillavalidoption