Cargando…
Medical practice and placebo response: an inseparable bond?
The history of medicine and the history of placebo are closely intertwined. To understand placebo and its effects this article gives a brief overview about its history, the possible mechanisms of action and its counterpart, nocebo. The Catholic Church used placebo around the sixteenth century for th...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7253381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32211987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-020-01626-9 |
_version_ | 1783539325260005376 |
---|---|
author | Jilch, Sandra Sel, Ruken Shariat, Shahrokh F. |
author_facet | Jilch, Sandra Sel, Ruken Shariat, Shahrokh F. |
author_sort | Jilch, Sandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | The history of medicine and the history of placebo are closely intertwined. To understand placebo and its effects this article gives a brief overview about its history, the possible mechanisms of action and its counterpart, nocebo. The Catholic Church used placebo around the sixteenth century for the separation from real and incorrect exorcisms, but it needed Henry Beecher during World War II to quantify the placebo effect as control arm in well-designed studies. Until today the different mechanisms of action of placebo remain poorly researched. Understanding them would allow its effect to be modulated to better serve in research and clinical settings. Expectation, psychosocial context and conditioning play a significant role in the effect size and amplitude. The counterpart, nocebo, is even less investigated, even it is commonly observed as adverse effects during medical treatments. Conclusion: Placebo and nocebo are both underestimated and underresearched in their value. Through further investigation doctors could strengthen the placebo response and prevent adverse effects to help their patients at low cost. These techniques would benefit the patient-doctor relationship, which is the alter of a trust-based successful therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7253381 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72533812020-06-04 Medical practice and placebo response: an inseparable bond? Jilch, Sandra Sel, Ruken Shariat, Shahrokh F. Wien Klin Wochenschr Main Topic The history of medicine and the history of placebo are closely intertwined. To understand placebo and its effects this article gives a brief overview about its history, the possible mechanisms of action and its counterpart, nocebo. The Catholic Church used placebo around the sixteenth century for the separation from real and incorrect exorcisms, but it needed Henry Beecher during World War II to quantify the placebo effect as control arm in well-designed studies. Until today the different mechanisms of action of placebo remain poorly researched. Understanding them would allow its effect to be modulated to better serve in research and clinical settings. Expectation, psychosocial context and conditioning play a significant role in the effect size and amplitude. The counterpart, nocebo, is even less investigated, even it is commonly observed as adverse effects during medical treatments. Conclusion: Placebo and nocebo are both underestimated and underresearched in their value. Through further investigation doctors could strengthen the placebo response and prevent adverse effects to help their patients at low cost. These techniques would benefit the patient-doctor relationship, which is the alter of a trust-based successful therapy. Springer Vienna 2020-03-24 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7253381/ /pubmed/32211987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-020-01626-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Main Topic Jilch, Sandra Sel, Ruken Shariat, Shahrokh F. Medical practice and placebo response: an inseparable bond? |
title | Medical practice and placebo response: an inseparable bond? |
title_full | Medical practice and placebo response: an inseparable bond? |
title_fullStr | Medical practice and placebo response: an inseparable bond? |
title_full_unstemmed | Medical practice and placebo response: an inseparable bond? |
title_short | Medical practice and placebo response: an inseparable bond? |
title_sort | medical practice and placebo response: an inseparable bond? |
topic | Main Topic |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7253381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32211987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-020-01626-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jilchsandra medicalpracticeandplaceboresponseaninseparablebond AT selruken medicalpracticeandplaceboresponseaninseparablebond AT shariatshahrokhf medicalpracticeandplaceboresponseaninseparablebond |