Cargando…

Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis after Cesarean section: a pictorial review

The rate of Cesarean sections (C-sections) in Poland increased from 21.7% in 2001 to 43.85% in 2017 even though the Polish Society of Gynecologists and Obstetricians highlights the negative consequences of C-section for both mother and child and recommends to make every possible effort to reduce its...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bekiesinska-Figatowska, Monika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7253593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32462368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00876-5
_version_ 1783539362959458304
author Bekiesinska-Figatowska, Monika
author_facet Bekiesinska-Figatowska, Monika
author_sort Bekiesinska-Figatowska, Monika
collection PubMed
description The rate of Cesarean sections (C-sections) in Poland increased from 21.7% in 2001 to 43.85% in 2017 even though the Polish Society of Gynecologists and Obstetricians highlights the negative consequences of C-section for both mother and child and recommends to make every possible effort to reduce its percentage, following the World Health Organization recommendations. There is a long list of possible complications related to the uterine scar after C-section, including uterine scar dehiscence, uterine rupture, abdominal and pelvic adhesions, uterine synechiae, ectopic pregnancy, anomalous location of the placenta, placental invasion, and—rarely—vesicouterine or uterocutaneous fistulas. Ultrasound (US) remains the first-line modality; however, its strong operator- and equipment dependence and other limitations require further investigations in some cases. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the second-line tool which is supposed to confirm, correct, or complete the sonographic diagnosis thanks to its higher tissue resolution and bigger field of view. This article will discuss the spectrum of C-section complications in the MR image-rich form and will provide a systematic discussion of the possible pathology that can occur, showing comprehensive anatomical insight into the pelvis after C-section thanks to MRI that facilitates clinical decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7253593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72535932020-06-08 Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis after Cesarean section: a pictorial review Bekiesinska-Figatowska, Monika Insights Imaging Educational Review The rate of Cesarean sections (C-sections) in Poland increased from 21.7% in 2001 to 43.85% in 2017 even though the Polish Society of Gynecologists and Obstetricians highlights the negative consequences of C-section for both mother and child and recommends to make every possible effort to reduce its percentage, following the World Health Organization recommendations. There is a long list of possible complications related to the uterine scar after C-section, including uterine scar dehiscence, uterine rupture, abdominal and pelvic adhesions, uterine synechiae, ectopic pregnancy, anomalous location of the placenta, placental invasion, and—rarely—vesicouterine or uterocutaneous fistulas. Ultrasound (US) remains the first-line modality; however, its strong operator- and equipment dependence and other limitations require further investigations in some cases. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the second-line tool which is supposed to confirm, correct, or complete the sonographic diagnosis thanks to its higher tissue resolution and bigger field of view. This article will discuss the spectrum of C-section complications in the MR image-rich form and will provide a systematic discussion of the possible pathology that can occur, showing comprehensive anatomical insight into the pelvis after C-section thanks to MRI that facilitates clinical decisions. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7253593/ /pubmed/32462368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00876-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Educational Review
Bekiesinska-Figatowska, Monika
Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis after Cesarean section: a pictorial review
title Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis after Cesarean section: a pictorial review
title_full Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis after Cesarean section: a pictorial review
title_fullStr Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis after Cesarean section: a pictorial review
title_full_unstemmed Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis after Cesarean section: a pictorial review
title_short Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis after Cesarean section: a pictorial review
title_sort magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis after cesarean section: a pictorial review
topic Educational Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7253593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32462368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00876-5
work_keys_str_mv AT bekiesinskafigatowskamonika magneticresonanceimagingofthefemalepelvisaftercesareansectionapictorialreview