Cargando…

Comparing the Effectiveness of Computer-Based, Manual-based, and Combined Cognitive Rehabilitation on Cognitive Functions in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of computer-based, manual-based, and combined cognitive rehabilitation to improve cognitive functions among patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS). METHODS: This was a quasi-experimental study with a pre-test-post-test,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rahmani, Mehri, Rahimian Boogar, Isaac, Talepasand, Siavash, Nokani, Mostafa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Neuroscience Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7253816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32483480
http://dx.doi.org/10.32598/bcn.9.10.430
_version_ 1783539406066417664
author Rahmani, Mehri
Rahimian Boogar, Isaac
Talepasand, Siavash
Nokani, Mostafa
author_facet Rahmani, Mehri
Rahimian Boogar, Isaac
Talepasand, Siavash
Nokani, Mostafa
author_sort Rahmani, Mehri
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of computer-based, manual-based, and combined cognitive rehabilitation to improve cognitive functions among patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS). METHODS: This was a quasi-experimental study with a pre-test-post-test, and a 2-month follow-up, as well as a control group design. Sixty female patients with RRMS were selected by convenience sampling technique. Then they were randomly assigned into three experimental groups (computer-based, manual-based, and combined cognitive rehabilitation, each group including 12 patients), a placebo group (12 patients), and a control group (12 patients). The interventions were conducted in 21 sessions for the experimental groups for 5 months. The placebo group received physical rehabilitation intervention, and the control group received no intervention. The study participants were assessed by Psychiatric-Neurological Profile, Mini-Mental State Examination, Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale, Stroop Color and Word Test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, and Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test. The obtained data were analyzed by repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance in SPSS. RESULTS: The effect of group factor was not significant (η(2)=0.129), but the effect of time (η(2)=0.884) and interaction effect of time and group (η(2)=0.295) were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the effects of all three rehabilitation interventions (P>0.05). In the post-test totally and in Follow-up partially, all comparisons among three experimental groups with control and placebo groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Cognitive rehabilitation was effective in improving cognitive functions in patients with RRMS. Thus, these interventions are recommended for application, along with other treatment protocols to treat RRMS in clinical settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7253816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Iranian Neuroscience Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72538162020-05-31 Comparing the Effectiveness of Computer-Based, Manual-based, and Combined Cognitive Rehabilitation on Cognitive Functions in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients Rahmani, Mehri Rahimian Boogar, Isaac Talepasand, Siavash Nokani, Mostafa Basic Clin Neurosci Research Paper INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of computer-based, manual-based, and combined cognitive rehabilitation to improve cognitive functions among patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS). METHODS: This was a quasi-experimental study with a pre-test-post-test, and a 2-month follow-up, as well as a control group design. Sixty female patients with RRMS were selected by convenience sampling technique. Then they were randomly assigned into three experimental groups (computer-based, manual-based, and combined cognitive rehabilitation, each group including 12 patients), a placebo group (12 patients), and a control group (12 patients). The interventions were conducted in 21 sessions for the experimental groups for 5 months. The placebo group received physical rehabilitation intervention, and the control group received no intervention. The study participants were assessed by Psychiatric-Neurological Profile, Mini-Mental State Examination, Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale, Stroop Color and Word Test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, and Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test. The obtained data were analyzed by repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance in SPSS. RESULTS: The effect of group factor was not significant (η(2)=0.129), but the effect of time (η(2)=0.884) and interaction effect of time and group (η(2)=0.295) were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the effects of all three rehabilitation interventions (P>0.05). In the post-test totally and in Follow-up partially, all comparisons among three experimental groups with control and placebo groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Cognitive rehabilitation was effective in improving cognitive functions in patients with RRMS. Thus, these interventions are recommended for application, along with other treatment protocols to treat RRMS in clinical settings. Iranian Neuroscience Society 2020 2020-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7253816/ /pubmed/32483480 http://dx.doi.org/10.32598/bcn.9.10.430 Text en Copyright© 2020 Iranian Neuroscience Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Rahmani, Mehri
Rahimian Boogar, Isaac
Talepasand, Siavash
Nokani, Mostafa
Comparing the Effectiveness of Computer-Based, Manual-based, and Combined Cognitive Rehabilitation on Cognitive Functions in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients
title Comparing the Effectiveness of Computer-Based, Manual-based, and Combined Cognitive Rehabilitation on Cognitive Functions in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients
title_full Comparing the Effectiveness of Computer-Based, Manual-based, and Combined Cognitive Rehabilitation on Cognitive Functions in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients
title_fullStr Comparing the Effectiveness of Computer-Based, Manual-based, and Combined Cognitive Rehabilitation on Cognitive Functions in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Effectiveness of Computer-Based, Manual-based, and Combined Cognitive Rehabilitation on Cognitive Functions in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients
title_short Comparing the Effectiveness of Computer-Based, Manual-based, and Combined Cognitive Rehabilitation on Cognitive Functions in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients
title_sort comparing the effectiveness of computer-based, manual-based, and combined cognitive rehabilitation on cognitive functions in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7253816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32483480
http://dx.doi.org/10.32598/bcn.9.10.430
work_keys_str_mv AT rahmanimehri comparingtheeffectivenessofcomputerbasedmanualbasedandcombinedcognitiverehabilitationoncognitivefunctionsinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosispatients
AT rahimianboogarisaac comparingtheeffectivenessofcomputerbasedmanualbasedandcombinedcognitiverehabilitationoncognitivefunctionsinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosispatients
AT talepasandsiavash comparingtheeffectivenessofcomputerbasedmanualbasedandcombinedcognitiverehabilitationoncognitivefunctionsinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosispatients
AT nokanimostafa comparingtheeffectivenessofcomputerbasedmanualbasedandcombinedcognitiverehabilitationoncognitivefunctionsinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosispatients