Cargando…

Psychological interventions to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The quality of evidence that psychological interventions are effective in improving glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is weak. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological interventions in T2D to assess whether their effectiveness in improving glycemic leve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winkley, Kirsty, Upsher, Rebecca, Stahl, Daniel, Pollard, Daniel, Brennan, Alan, Heller, Simon R, Ismail, Khalida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32273289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001150
_version_ 1783539466661527552
author Winkley, Kirsty
Upsher, Rebecca
Stahl, Daniel
Pollard, Daniel
Brennan, Alan
Heller, Simon R
Ismail, Khalida
author_facet Winkley, Kirsty
Upsher, Rebecca
Stahl, Daniel
Pollard, Daniel
Brennan, Alan
Heller, Simon R
Ismail, Khalida
author_sort Winkley, Kirsty
collection PubMed
description The quality of evidence that psychological interventions are effective in improving glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is weak. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological interventions in T2D to assess whether their effectiveness in improving glycemic levels has improved over the past 30 years. We applied the protocol of a systematic review and aggregate meta-analysis conducted to January 2003. We added network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare intervention and control group type against usual care. MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Database, Web of Science, and Dissertation Abstracts International were searched from January 2003 to July 2018. Only randomized controlled trials (RCT) of psychological interventions for adults with T2D reported in any language were included. The primary outcome was change in glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in mmol/mol). Data were extracted from study reports and authors were contacted for missing data. 94 RCTs were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review since the last review. In 70 RCTs (n=14 796 participants) the pooled mean difference in HbA1c in those randomized to psychological intervention compared with control group was −0.19 (95% CI −0.25 to −0.12), equivalent to a reduction in HbA1c of 3.7 mmol/mol, with moderate heterogeneity across studies (I(2)=64.7%, p<0.001). NMA suggested the probability of intervention effectiveness is highest for self-help materials, cognitive–behavioral therapy, and counseling, compared with usual care. Limitations of this study include that there is a possibility that some studies may have been missed if diabetes did not appear in the title or abstract. The effectiveness of psychological interventions for adults with T2D have minimal clinical benefit in improving glycemic control. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016033619.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7254106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72541062020-06-05 Psychological interventions to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Winkley, Kirsty Upsher, Rebecca Stahl, Daniel Pollard, Daniel Brennan, Alan Heller, Simon R Ismail, Khalida BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Psychosocial Research The quality of evidence that psychological interventions are effective in improving glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is weak. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological interventions in T2D to assess whether their effectiveness in improving glycemic levels has improved over the past 30 years. We applied the protocol of a systematic review and aggregate meta-analysis conducted to January 2003. We added network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare intervention and control group type against usual care. MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Database, Web of Science, and Dissertation Abstracts International were searched from January 2003 to July 2018. Only randomized controlled trials (RCT) of psychological interventions for adults with T2D reported in any language were included. The primary outcome was change in glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in mmol/mol). Data were extracted from study reports and authors were contacted for missing data. 94 RCTs were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review since the last review. In 70 RCTs (n=14 796 participants) the pooled mean difference in HbA1c in those randomized to psychological intervention compared with control group was −0.19 (95% CI −0.25 to −0.12), equivalent to a reduction in HbA1c of 3.7 mmol/mol, with moderate heterogeneity across studies (I(2)=64.7%, p<0.001). NMA suggested the probability of intervention effectiveness is highest for self-help materials, cognitive–behavioral therapy, and counseling, compared with usual care. Limitations of this study include that there is a possibility that some studies may have been missed if diabetes did not appear in the title or abstract. The effectiveness of psychological interventions for adults with T2D have minimal clinical benefit in improving glycemic control. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016033619. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7254106/ /pubmed/32273289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001150 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Psychosocial Research
Winkley, Kirsty
Upsher, Rebecca
Stahl, Daniel
Pollard, Daniel
Brennan, Alan
Heller, Simon R
Ismail, Khalida
Psychological interventions to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Psychological interventions to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Psychological interventions to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Psychological interventions to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Psychological interventions to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Psychological interventions to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort psychological interventions to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Psychosocial Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32273289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001150
work_keys_str_mv AT winkleykirsty psychologicalinterventionstoimproveglycemiccontrolinadultswithtype2diabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT upsherrebecca psychologicalinterventionstoimproveglycemiccontrolinadultswithtype2diabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT stahldaniel psychologicalinterventionstoimproveglycemiccontrolinadultswithtype2diabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pollarddaniel psychologicalinterventionstoimproveglycemiccontrolinadultswithtype2diabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT brennanalan psychologicalinterventionstoimproveglycemiccontrolinadultswithtype2diabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hellersimonr psychologicalinterventionstoimproveglycemiccontrolinadultswithtype2diabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ismailkhalida psychologicalinterventionstoimproveglycemiccontrolinadultswithtype2diabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis