Cargando…

Impact of Electronic Alternatives to Tobacco Cigarettes on Indoor Air Particular Matter Levels

An aerosol study was carried out in a test room measuring particulate matter (PM) with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 10, 4, 2.5 and 1 µm (PM(10), PM(4), PM(2.5), PM(1)) before and during the use of electronic alternatives to tobacco cigarettes (EATC) IQOS(®), GLO(®), JUUL(®), with different k...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Protano, Carmela, Manigrasso, Maurizio, Cammalleri, Vittoria, Biondi Zoccai, Giuseppe, Frati, Giacomo, Avino, Pasquale, Vitali, Matteo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32344704
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082947
_version_ 1783539513135464448
author Protano, Carmela
Manigrasso, Maurizio
Cammalleri, Vittoria
Biondi Zoccai, Giuseppe
Frati, Giacomo
Avino, Pasquale
Vitali, Matteo
author_facet Protano, Carmela
Manigrasso, Maurizio
Cammalleri, Vittoria
Biondi Zoccai, Giuseppe
Frati, Giacomo
Avino, Pasquale
Vitali, Matteo
author_sort Protano, Carmela
collection PubMed
description An aerosol study was carried out in a test room measuring particulate matter (PM) with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 10, 4, 2.5 and 1 µm (PM(10), PM(4), PM(2.5), PM(1)) before and during the use of electronic alternatives to tobacco cigarettes (EATC) IQOS(®), GLO(®), JUUL(®), with different kinds of sticks/pods, as well as during the smoking of a conventional tobacco cigarette. The aerosol was mainly in the PM(1) size range (>95%). All studied EATCs caused lower indoor PM(1) concentrations than conventional tobacco cigarettes. Nevertheless, they determined a worsening of indoor-PM(1) concentration that ranged from very mild for JUUL(®)—depending on the pod used—to considerably severe for IQOS(®) and GLO(®). Median values ranged from 11.00 (Iqos3 and Juul2) to 337.5 µg m(−3) (Iqos4). The high variability of particle loadings was attributed both to the type of stick/pod used and to the different way of smoking of volunteers who smoked/vaped during the experiments. Moreover, during vaping IQOS(®) and GLO(®) indoor PM(1) concentrations reach levels by far higher than outdoor concentrations that range from 14 to 21 µg m(−3), especially during the exhalation of the smoke. From these results emerge an urgent need of a legislative regulation limiting the use of such devices in public places.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7254302
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72543022020-06-10 Impact of Electronic Alternatives to Tobacco Cigarettes on Indoor Air Particular Matter Levels Protano, Carmela Manigrasso, Maurizio Cammalleri, Vittoria Biondi Zoccai, Giuseppe Frati, Giacomo Avino, Pasquale Vitali, Matteo Int J Environ Res Public Health Article An aerosol study was carried out in a test room measuring particulate matter (PM) with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 10, 4, 2.5 and 1 µm (PM(10), PM(4), PM(2.5), PM(1)) before and during the use of electronic alternatives to tobacco cigarettes (EATC) IQOS(®), GLO(®), JUUL(®), with different kinds of sticks/pods, as well as during the smoking of a conventional tobacco cigarette. The aerosol was mainly in the PM(1) size range (>95%). All studied EATCs caused lower indoor PM(1) concentrations than conventional tobacco cigarettes. Nevertheless, they determined a worsening of indoor-PM(1) concentration that ranged from very mild for JUUL(®)—depending on the pod used—to considerably severe for IQOS(®) and GLO(®). Median values ranged from 11.00 (Iqos3 and Juul2) to 337.5 µg m(−3) (Iqos4). The high variability of particle loadings was attributed both to the type of stick/pod used and to the different way of smoking of volunteers who smoked/vaped during the experiments. Moreover, during vaping IQOS(®) and GLO(®) indoor PM(1) concentrations reach levels by far higher than outdoor concentrations that range from 14 to 21 µg m(−3), especially during the exhalation of the smoke. From these results emerge an urgent need of a legislative regulation limiting the use of such devices in public places. MDPI 2020-04-24 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7254302/ /pubmed/32344704 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082947 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Protano, Carmela
Manigrasso, Maurizio
Cammalleri, Vittoria
Biondi Zoccai, Giuseppe
Frati, Giacomo
Avino, Pasquale
Vitali, Matteo
Impact of Electronic Alternatives to Tobacco Cigarettes on Indoor Air Particular Matter Levels
title Impact of Electronic Alternatives to Tobacco Cigarettes on Indoor Air Particular Matter Levels
title_full Impact of Electronic Alternatives to Tobacco Cigarettes on Indoor Air Particular Matter Levels
title_fullStr Impact of Electronic Alternatives to Tobacco Cigarettes on Indoor Air Particular Matter Levels
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Electronic Alternatives to Tobacco Cigarettes on Indoor Air Particular Matter Levels
title_short Impact of Electronic Alternatives to Tobacco Cigarettes on Indoor Air Particular Matter Levels
title_sort impact of electronic alternatives to tobacco cigarettes on indoor air particular matter levels
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32344704
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082947
work_keys_str_mv AT protanocarmela impactofelectronicalternativestotobaccocigarettesonindoorairparticularmatterlevels
AT manigrassomaurizio impactofelectronicalternativestotobaccocigarettesonindoorairparticularmatterlevels
AT cammallerivittoria impactofelectronicalternativestotobaccocigarettesonindoorairparticularmatterlevels
AT biondizoccaigiuseppe impactofelectronicalternativestotobaccocigarettesonindoorairparticularmatterlevels
AT fratigiacomo impactofelectronicalternativestotobaccocigarettesonindoorairparticularmatterlevels
AT avinopasquale impactofelectronicalternativestotobaccocigarettesonindoorairparticularmatterlevels
AT vitalimatteo impactofelectronicalternativestotobaccocigarettesonindoorairparticularmatterlevels