Cargando…
Impact of Electronic Alternatives to Tobacco Cigarettes on Indoor Air Particular Matter Levels
An aerosol study was carried out in a test room measuring particulate matter (PM) with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 10, 4, 2.5 and 1 µm (PM(10), PM(4), PM(2.5), PM(1)) before and during the use of electronic alternatives to tobacco cigarettes (EATC) IQOS(®), GLO(®), JUUL(®), with different k...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32344704 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082947 |
_version_ | 1783539513135464448 |
---|---|
author | Protano, Carmela Manigrasso, Maurizio Cammalleri, Vittoria Biondi Zoccai, Giuseppe Frati, Giacomo Avino, Pasquale Vitali, Matteo |
author_facet | Protano, Carmela Manigrasso, Maurizio Cammalleri, Vittoria Biondi Zoccai, Giuseppe Frati, Giacomo Avino, Pasquale Vitali, Matteo |
author_sort | Protano, Carmela |
collection | PubMed |
description | An aerosol study was carried out in a test room measuring particulate matter (PM) with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 10, 4, 2.5 and 1 µm (PM(10), PM(4), PM(2.5), PM(1)) before and during the use of electronic alternatives to tobacco cigarettes (EATC) IQOS(®), GLO(®), JUUL(®), with different kinds of sticks/pods, as well as during the smoking of a conventional tobacco cigarette. The aerosol was mainly in the PM(1) size range (>95%). All studied EATCs caused lower indoor PM(1) concentrations than conventional tobacco cigarettes. Nevertheless, they determined a worsening of indoor-PM(1) concentration that ranged from very mild for JUUL(®)—depending on the pod used—to considerably severe for IQOS(®) and GLO(®). Median values ranged from 11.00 (Iqos3 and Juul2) to 337.5 µg m(−3) (Iqos4). The high variability of particle loadings was attributed both to the type of stick/pod used and to the different way of smoking of volunteers who smoked/vaped during the experiments. Moreover, during vaping IQOS(®) and GLO(®) indoor PM(1) concentrations reach levels by far higher than outdoor concentrations that range from 14 to 21 µg m(−3), especially during the exhalation of the smoke. From these results emerge an urgent need of a legislative regulation limiting the use of such devices in public places. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7254302 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72543022020-06-10 Impact of Electronic Alternatives to Tobacco Cigarettes on Indoor Air Particular Matter Levels Protano, Carmela Manigrasso, Maurizio Cammalleri, Vittoria Biondi Zoccai, Giuseppe Frati, Giacomo Avino, Pasquale Vitali, Matteo Int J Environ Res Public Health Article An aerosol study was carried out in a test room measuring particulate matter (PM) with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 10, 4, 2.5 and 1 µm (PM(10), PM(4), PM(2.5), PM(1)) before and during the use of electronic alternatives to tobacco cigarettes (EATC) IQOS(®), GLO(®), JUUL(®), with different kinds of sticks/pods, as well as during the smoking of a conventional tobacco cigarette. The aerosol was mainly in the PM(1) size range (>95%). All studied EATCs caused lower indoor PM(1) concentrations than conventional tobacco cigarettes. Nevertheless, they determined a worsening of indoor-PM(1) concentration that ranged from very mild for JUUL(®)—depending on the pod used—to considerably severe for IQOS(®) and GLO(®). Median values ranged from 11.00 (Iqos3 and Juul2) to 337.5 µg m(−3) (Iqos4). The high variability of particle loadings was attributed both to the type of stick/pod used and to the different way of smoking of volunteers who smoked/vaped during the experiments. Moreover, during vaping IQOS(®) and GLO(®) indoor PM(1) concentrations reach levels by far higher than outdoor concentrations that range from 14 to 21 µg m(−3), especially during the exhalation of the smoke. From these results emerge an urgent need of a legislative regulation limiting the use of such devices in public places. MDPI 2020-04-24 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7254302/ /pubmed/32344704 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082947 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Protano, Carmela Manigrasso, Maurizio Cammalleri, Vittoria Biondi Zoccai, Giuseppe Frati, Giacomo Avino, Pasquale Vitali, Matteo Impact of Electronic Alternatives to Tobacco Cigarettes on Indoor Air Particular Matter Levels |
title | Impact of Electronic Alternatives to Tobacco Cigarettes on Indoor Air Particular Matter Levels |
title_full | Impact of Electronic Alternatives to Tobacco Cigarettes on Indoor Air Particular Matter Levels |
title_fullStr | Impact of Electronic Alternatives to Tobacco Cigarettes on Indoor Air Particular Matter Levels |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Electronic Alternatives to Tobacco Cigarettes on Indoor Air Particular Matter Levels |
title_short | Impact of Electronic Alternatives to Tobacco Cigarettes on Indoor Air Particular Matter Levels |
title_sort | impact of electronic alternatives to tobacco cigarettes on indoor air particular matter levels |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32344704 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082947 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT protanocarmela impactofelectronicalternativestotobaccocigarettesonindoorairparticularmatterlevels AT manigrassomaurizio impactofelectronicalternativestotobaccocigarettesonindoorairparticularmatterlevels AT cammallerivittoria impactofelectronicalternativestotobaccocigarettesonindoorairparticularmatterlevels AT biondizoccaigiuseppe impactofelectronicalternativestotobaccocigarettesonindoorairparticularmatterlevels AT fratigiacomo impactofelectronicalternativestotobaccocigarettesonindoorairparticularmatterlevels AT avinopasquale impactofelectronicalternativestotobaccocigarettesonindoorairparticularmatterlevels AT vitalimatteo impactofelectronicalternativestotobaccocigarettesonindoorairparticularmatterlevels |