Cargando…

A 4 Year Human, Randomized, Radiographic Study of Scalloped versus Non-Scalloped Cemented Implants

Marginal bone loss (MBL) is a key factor in long-term implant success rate. Among the different factors that influence MBL, it is the different implant shoulder designs, such as scalloped or non-scalloped, which have been widely studied on screw retained but not on cemented retained implants. Thus,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sinjari, Bruna, D’Addazio, Gianmaria, Santilli, Manlio, D’Avanzo, Barbara, Rexhepi, Imena, Scarano, Antonio, Traini, Tonino, Piattelli, Maurizio, Caputi, Sergio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32397597
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13092190
_version_ 1783539515269316608
author Sinjari, Bruna
D’Addazio, Gianmaria
Santilli, Manlio
D’Avanzo, Barbara
Rexhepi, Imena
Scarano, Antonio
Traini, Tonino
Piattelli, Maurizio
Caputi, Sergio
author_facet Sinjari, Bruna
D’Addazio, Gianmaria
Santilli, Manlio
D’Avanzo, Barbara
Rexhepi, Imena
Scarano, Antonio
Traini, Tonino
Piattelli, Maurizio
Caputi, Sergio
author_sort Sinjari, Bruna
collection PubMed
description Marginal bone loss (MBL) is a key factor in long-term implant success rate. Among the different factors that influence MBL, it is the different implant shoulder designs, such as scalloped or non-scalloped, which have been widely studied on screw retained but not on cemented retained implants. Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the MBL around scalloped and non-scalloped cemented retained dental implants after 4 years of loading, in humans. A total of 15 patients were enrolled in the present study. A radiographic and clinical examination was performed after implant placement (T0) and after 4 years from it (T1). The results demonstrated a differential MBL (T1-T0) of 2.436 ± 1.103 mm and 1.923 ± 1.021 mm, respectively for test (scalloped) and control (non-scalloped) groups with a statistically significant difference between them. On the other hand, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups in terms of prosthetic complication and abutment decementation, whilst ceramic crowns chipping was shown in both groups. In conclusion, the use of a scalloped platform did not provide better results on the maintenance of MBL after 4 years follow-up. In this study, this probably was determined by multiple factors, among which was the subcrestal insertion of scalloped implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7254311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72543112020-06-10 A 4 Year Human, Randomized, Radiographic Study of Scalloped versus Non-Scalloped Cemented Implants Sinjari, Bruna D’Addazio, Gianmaria Santilli, Manlio D’Avanzo, Barbara Rexhepi, Imena Scarano, Antonio Traini, Tonino Piattelli, Maurizio Caputi, Sergio Materials (Basel) Article Marginal bone loss (MBL) is a key factor in long-term implant success rate. Among the different factors that influence MBL, it is the different implant shoulder designs, such as scalloped or non-scalloped, which have been widely studied on screw retained but not on cemented retained implants. Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the MBL around scalloped and non-scalloped cemented retained dental implants after 4 years of loading, in humans. A total of 15 patients were enrolled in the present study. A radiographic and clinical examination was performed after implant placement (T0) and after 4 years from it (T1). The results demonstrated a differential MBL (T1-T0) of 2.436 ± 1.103 mm and 1.923 ± 1.021 mm, respectively for test (scalloped) and control (non-scalloped) groups with a statistically significant difference between them. On the other hand, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups in terms of prosthetic complication and abutment decementation, whilst ceramic crowns chipping was shown in both groups. In conclusion, the use of a scalloped platform did not provide better results on the maintenance of MBL after 4 years follow-up. In this study, this probably was determined by multiple factors, among which was the subcrestal insertion of scalloped implants. MDPI 2020-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7254311/ /pubmed/32397597 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13092190 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sinjari, Bruna
D’Addazio, Gianmaria
Santilli, Manlio
D’Avanzo, Barbara
Rexhepi, Imena
Scarano, Antonio
Traini, Tonino
Piattelli, Maurizio
Caputi, Sergio
A 4 Year Human, Randomized, Radiographic Study of Scalloped versus Non-Scalloped Cemented Implants
title A 4 Year Human, Randomized, Radiographic Study of Scalloped versus Non-Scalloped Cemented Implants
title_full A 4 Year Human, Randomized, Radiographic Study of Scalloped versus Non-Scalloped Cemented Implants
title_fullStr A 4 Year Human, Randomized, Radiographic Study of Scalloped versus Non-Scalloped Cemented Implants
title_full_unstemmed A 4 Year Human, Randomized, Radiographic Study of Scalloped versus Non-Scalloped Cemented Implants
title_short A 4 Year Human, Randomized, Radiographic Study of Scalloped versus Non-Scalloped Cemented Implants
title_sort 4 year human, randomized, radiographic study of scalloped versus non-scalloped cemented implants
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32397597
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13092190
work_keys_str_mv AT sinjaribruna a4yearhumanrandomizedradiographicstudyofscallopedversusnonscallopedcementedimplants
AT daddaziogianmaria a4yearhumanrandomizedradiographicstudyofscallopedversusnonscallopedcementedimplants
AT santillimanlio a4yearhumanrandomizedradiographicstudyofscallopedversusnonscallopedcementedimplants
AT davanzobarbara a4yearhumanrandomizedradiographicstudyofscallopedversusnonscallopedcementedimplants
AT rexhepiimena a4yearhumanrandomizedradiographicstudyofscallopedversusnonscallopedcementedimplants
AT scaranoantonio a4yearhumanrandomizedradiographicstudyofscallopedversusnonscallopedcementedimplants
AT trainitonino a4yearhumanrandomizedradiographicstudyofscallopedversusnonscallopedcementedimplants
AT piattellimaurizio a4yearhumanrandomizedradiographicstudyofscallopedversusnonscallopedcementedimplants
AT caputisergio a4yearhumanrandomizedradiographicstudyofscallopedversusnonscallopedcementedimplants
AT sinjaribruna 4yearhumanrandomizedradiographicstudyofscallopedversusnonscallopedcementedimplants
AT daddaziogianmaria 4yearhumanrandomizedradiographicstudyofscallopedversusnonscallopedcementedimplants
AT santillimanlio 4yearhumanrandomizedradiographicstudyofscallopedversusnonscallopedcementedimplants
AT davanzobarbara 4yearhumanrandomizedradiographicstudyofscallopedversusnonscallopedcementedimplants
AT rexhepiimena 4yearhumanrandomizedradiographicstudyofscallopedversusnonscallopedcementedimplants
AT scaranoantonio 4yearhumanrandomizedradiographicstudyofscallopedversusnonscallopedcementedimplants
AT trainitonino 4yearhumanrandomizedradiographicstudyofscallopedversusnonscallopedcementedimplants
AT piattellimaurizio 4yearhumanrandomizedradiographicstudyofscallopedversusnonscallopedcementedimplants
AT caputisergio 4yearhumanrandomizedradiographicstudyofscallopedversusnonscallopedcementedimplants