Cargando…
Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options
OBJECTIVE: Decision-making and patient experiences with embryo selection during in vitro fertilization often include genetic testing options. The purpose of this study was to gain insight about the experiences and perspectives of women using in vitro fertilization and genetic technologies. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32518912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2633494119899942 |
_version_ | 1783539569725014016 |
---|---|
author | Rothwell, Erin Lamb, Brandy Johnson, Erin Gurtcheff, Shawn Riches, Naomi Fagan, Melinda Sabatello, Maya Johnstone, Erica |
author_facet | Rothwell, Erin Lamb, Brandy Johnson, Erin Gurtcheff, Shawn Riches, Naomi Fagan, Melinda Sabatello, Maya Johnstone, Erica |
author_sort | Rothwell, Erin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Decision-making and patient experiences with embryo selection during in vitro fertilization often include genetic testing options. The purpose of this study was to gain insight about the experiences and perspectives of women using in vitro fertilization and genetic technologies. METHODS: Interviews (n = 37) were conducted among female patients who had undergone in vitro fertilization, underwent expanded carrier screening, and were offered pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy between July 2016 and July 2017. The interviews were transcribed and a content analysis was conducted on the transcripts. RESULTS: Categories that emerged from the data analysis included unexpected outcomes, uncertainty, unanticipated emotional consequences, too much emphasis on the woman’s contributions and questions about embryo viability. Patient experiences with genetic technologies during in vitro fertilization played a significant role within these results. CONCLUSION: The emotional and psychological impacts of infertility during in vitro fertilization were the primary concerns discussed by participants. Future research is needed to identify ways to help manage unexpected outcomes and continuous uncertainty, including the increasing use of genetic technologies, to not add to the psychological burden of infertility. There is a need to explore more support options or counseling services for patients struggling with infertility during in vitro fertilization treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7254585 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72545852020-06-08 Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options Rothwell, Erin Lamb, Brandy Johnson, Erin Gurtcheff, Shawn Riches, Naomi Fagan, Melinda Sabatello, Maya Johnstone, Erica Ther Adv Reprod Health Original Research OBJECTIVE: Decision-making and patient experiences with embryo selection during in vitro fertilization often include genetic testing options. The purpose of this study was to gain insight about the experiences and perspectives of women using in vitro fertilization and genetic technologies. METHODS: Interviews (n = 37) were conducted among female patients who had undergone in vitro fertilization, underwent expanded carrier screening, and were offered pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy between July 2016 and July 2017. The interviews were transcribed and a content analysis was conducted on the transcripts. RESULTS: Categories that emerged from the data analysis included unexpected outcomes, uncertainty, unanticipated emotional consequences, too much emphasis on the woman’s contributions and questions about embryo viability. Patient experiences with genetic technologies during in vitro fertilization played a significant role within these results. CONCLUSION: The emotional and psychological impacts of infertility during in vitro fertilization were the primary concerns discussed by participants. Future research is needed to identify ways to help manage unexpected outcomes and continuous uncertainty, including the increasing use of genetic technologies, to not add to the psychological burden of infertility. There is a need to explore more support options or counseling services for patients struggling with infertility during in vitro fertilization treatment. SAGE Publications 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7254585/ /pubmed/32518912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2633494119899942 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Rothwell, Erin Lamb, Brandy Johnson, Erin Gurtcheff, Shawn Riches, Naomi Fagan, Melinda Sabatello, Maya Johnstone, Erica Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options |
title | Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options |
title_full | Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options |
title_fullStr | Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options |
title_short | Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options |
title_sort | patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32518912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2633494119899942 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rothwellerin patientperspectivesandexperienceswithinvitrofertilizationandgenetictestingoptions AT lambbrandy patientperspectivesandexperienceswithinvitrofertilizationandgenetictestingoptions AT johnsonerin patientperspectivesandexperienceswithinvitrofertilizationandgenetictestingoptions AT gurtcheffshawn patientperspectivesandexperienceswithinvitrofertilizationandgenetictestingoptions AT richesnaomi patientperspectivesandexperienceswithinvitrofertilizationandgenetictestingoptions AT faganmelinda patientperspectivesandexperienceswithinvitrofertilizationandgenetictestingoptions AT sabatellomaya patientperspectivesandexperienceswithinvitrofertilizationandgenetictestingoptions AT johnstoneerica patientperspectivesandexperienceswithinvitrofertilizationandgenetictestingoptions |