Cargando…

Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options

OBJECTIVE: Decision-making and patient experiences with embryo selection during in vitro fertilization often include genetic testing options. The purpose of this study was to gain insight about the experiences and perspectives of women using in vitro fertilization and genetic technologies. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rothwell, Erin, Lamb, Brandy, Johnson, Erin, Gurtcheff, Shawn, Riches, Naomi, Fagan, Melinda, Sabatello, Maya, Johnstone, Erica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32518912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2633494119899942
_version_ 1783539569725014016
author Rothwell, Erin
Lamb, Brandy
Johnson, Erin
Gurtcheff, Shawn
Riches, Naomi
Fagan, Melinda
Sabatello, Maya
Johnstone, Erica
author_facet Rothwell, Erin
Lamb, Brandy
Johnson, Erin
Gurtcheff, Shawn
Riches, Naomi
Fagan, Melinda
Sabatello, Maya
Johnstone, Erica
author_sort Rothwell, Erin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Decision-making and patient experiences with embryo selection during in vitro fertilization often include genetic testing options. The purpose of this study was to gain insight about the experiences and perspectives of women using in vitro fertilization and genetic technologies. METHODS: Interviews (n = 37) were conducted among female patients who had undergone in vitro fertilization, underwent expanded carrier screening, and were offered pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy between July 2016 and July 2017. The interviews were transcribed and a content analysis was conducted on the transcripts. RESULTS: Categories that emerged from the data analysis included unexpected outcomes, uncertainty, unanticipated emotional consequences, too much emphasis on the woman’s contributions and questions about embryo viability. Patient experiences with genetic technologies during in vitro fertilization played a significant role within these results. CONCLUSION: The emotional and psychological impacts of infertility during in vitro fertilization were the primary concerns discussed by participants. Future research is needed to identify ways to help manage unexpected outcomes and continuous uncertainty, including the increasing use of genetic technologies, to not add to the psychological burden of infertility. There is a need to explore more support options or counseling services for patients struggling with infertility during in vitro fertilization treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7254585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72545852020-06-08 Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options Rothwell, Erin Lamb, Brandy Johnson, Erin Gurtcheff, Shawn Riches, Naomi Fagan, Melinda Sabatello, Maya Johnstone, Erica Ther Adv Reprod Health Original Research OBJECTIVE: Decision-making and patient experiences with embryo selection during in vitro fertilization often include genetic testing options. The purpose of this study was to gain insight about the experiences and perspectives of women using in vitro fertilization and genetic technologies. METHODS: Interviews (n = 37) were conducted among female patients who had undergone in vitro fertilization, underwent expanded carrier screening, and were offered pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy between July 2016 and July 2017. The interviews were transcribed and a content analysis was conducted on the transcripts. RESULTS: Categories that emerged from the data analysis included unexpected outcomes, uncertainty, unanticipated emotional consequences, too much emphasis on the woman’s contributions and questions about embryo viability. Patient experiences with genetic technologies during in vitro fertilization played a significant role within these results. CONCLUSION: The emotional and psychological impacts of infertility during in vitro fertilization were the primary concerns discussed by participants. Future research is needed to identify ways to help manage unexpected outcomes and continuous uncertainty, including the increasing use of genetic technologies, to not add to the psychological burden of infertility. There is a need to explore more support options or counseling services for patients struggling with infertility during in vitro fertilization treatment. SAGE Publications 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7254585/ /pubmed/32518912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2633494119899942 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Rothwell, Erin
Lamb, Brandy
Johnson, Erin
Gurtcheff, Shawn
Riches, Naomi
Fagan, Melinda
Sabatello, Maya
Johnstone, Erica
Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options
title Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options
title_full Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options
title_fullStr Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options
title_full_unstemmed Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options
title_short Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options
title_sort patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32518912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2633494119899942
work_keys_str_mv AT rothwellerin patientperspectivesandexperienceswithinvitrofertilizationandgenetictestingoptions
AT lambbrandy patientperspectivesandexperienceswithinvitrofertilizationandgenetictestingoptions
AT johnsonerin patientperspectivesandexperienceswithinvitrofertilizationandgenetictestingoptions
AT gurtcheffshawn patientperspectivesandexperienceswithinvitrofertilizationandgenetictestingoptions
AT richesnaomi patientperspectivesandexperienceswithinvitrofertilizationandgenetictestingoptions
AT faganmelinda patientperspectivesandexperienceswithinvitrofertilizationandgenetictestingoptions
AT sabatellomaya patientperspectivesandexperienceswithinvitrofertilizationandgenetictestingoptions
AT johnstoneerica patientperspectivesandexperienceswithinvitrofertilizationandgenetictestingoptions