Cargando…
Risk stratification for prostate cancer management: value of the Cambridge Prognostic Group classification for assessing treatment allocation
BACKGROUND: The five-tiered Cambridge Prognostic Group (CPG) classification is a better predictor of prostate cancer-specific mortality than the traditional three-tiered classification (low, intermediate, and high risk). We investigated radical treatment rates according to CPG in men diagnosed with...
Autores principales: | Parry, M. G., Cowling, T. E., Sujenthiran, A., Nossiter, J., Berry, B., Cathcart, P., Aggarwal, A., Payne, H., van der Meulen, J., Clarke, N. W., Gnanapragasam, V. J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32460859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01588-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Impact of cancer service centralisation on the radical treatment of men with high‐risk and locally advanced prostate cancer: A national cross‐sectional analysis in England
por: Parry, Matthew G, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Treatment-related toxicity using prostate bed versus prostate bed and pelvic lymph node radiation therapy following radical prostatectomy: A national population-based study
por: Sujenthiran, Arunan, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
National cohort study comparing severe medium‐term urinary complications after robot‐assisted vs laparoscopic vs retropubic open radical prostatectomy
por: Sujenthiran, Arunan, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy: functional outcomes 18 months after diagnosis from a national cohort study in England
por: Nossiter, Julie, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Composite risk stratification models optimise the value of imaging in prostate cancer staging
por: McAllister, Tom, et al.
Publicado: (2023)