Cargando…

Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis

BACKGROUND: Prostate MRI has become a corner stone in diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). Diffusion weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can be used to reflect tumor microstructure. The present analysis sought to compare ADC values of clinically insignificant with clinical si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meyer, Hans-Jonas, Wienke, Andreas, Surov, Alexey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32460795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06942-x
_version_ 1783539589038735360
author Meyer, Hans-Jonas
Wienke, Andreas
Surov, Alexey
author_facet Meyer, Hans-Jonas
Wienke, Andreas
Surov, Alexey
author_sort Meyer, Hans-Jonas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prostate MRI has become a corner stone in diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). Diffusion weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can be used to reflect tumor microstructure. The present analysis sought to compare ADC values of clinically insignificant with clinical significant PC based upon a large patient sample. METHODS: MEDLINE library and SCOPUS databases were screened for the associations between ADC and Gleason score (GS) in PC up to May 2019. The primary endpoint of the systematic review was the ADC value of PC groups according to Gleason score. In total 26 studies were suitable for the analysis and included into the present study. The included studies comprised a total of 1633 lesions. RESULTS: Clinically significant PCs (GS ≥ 7) were diagnosed in 1078 cases (66.0%) and insignificant PCs (GS 5 and 6) in 555 cases (34.0%). The pooled mean ADC value derived from monoexponenantially fitted ADC(mean) of the clinically significant PC was 0.86 × 10(− 3) mm(2)/s [95% CI 0.83–0.90] and the pooled mean value of insignificant PC was 1.1 × 10(− 3) mm(2)/s [95% CI 1.03–1.18]. Clinical significant PC showed lower ADC values compared to non-significant PC. The pooled ADC values of clinically insignificant PCs were no lower than 0.75 × 10(− 3) mm(2)/s. CONCLUSIONS: We evaluated the published literature comparing clinical insignificant with clinically prostate cancer in regard of the Apparent diffusion coefficient values derived from magnetic resonance imaging. We identified that the clinically insignificant prostate cancer have lower ADC values than clinically significant, which may aid in tumor noninvasive tumor characterization in clinical routine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7254689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72546892020-06-07 Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis Meyer, Hans-Jonas Wienke, Andreas Surov, Alexey BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Prostate MRI has become a corner stone in diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). Diffusion weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can be used to reflect tumor microstructure. The present analysis sought to compare ADC values of clinically insignificant with clinical significant PC based upon a large patient sample. METHODS: MEDLINE library and SCOPUS databases were screened for the associations between ADC and Gleason score (GS) in PC up to May 2019. The primary endpoint of the systematic review was the ADC value of PC groups according to Gleason score. In total 26 studies were suitable for the analysis and included into the present study. The included studies comprised a total of 1633 lesions. RESULTS: Clinically significant PCs (GS ≥ 7) were diagnosed in 1078 cases (66.0%) and insignificant PCs (GS 5 and 6) in 555 cases (34.0%). The pooled mean ADC value derived from monoexponenantially fitted ADC(mean) of the clinically significant PC was 0.86 × 10(− 3) mm(2)/s [95% CI 0.83–0.90] and the pooled mean value of insignificant PC was 1.1 × 10(− 3) mm(2)/s [95% CI 1.03–1.18]. Clinical significant PC showed lower ADC values compared to non-significant PC. The pooled ADC values of clinically insignificant PCs were no lower than 0.75 × 10(− 3) mm(2)/s. CONCLUSIONS: We evaluated the published literature comparing clinical insignificant with clinically prostate cancer in regard of the Apparent diffusion coefficient values derived from magnetic resonance imaging. We identified that the clinically insignificant prostate cancer have lower ADC values than clinically significant, which may aid in tumor noninvasive tumor characterization in clinical routine. BioMed Central 2020-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7254689/ /pubmed/32460795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06942-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Meyer, Hans-Jonas
Wienke, Andreas
Surov, Alexey
Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis
title Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis
title_full Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis
title_fullStr Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis
title_full_unstemmed Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis
title_short Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis
title_sort discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32460795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06942-x
work_keys_str_mv AT meyerhansjonas discriminationbetweenclinicalsignificantandinsignificantprostatecancerwithapparentdiffusioncoefficientasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wienkeandreas discriminationbetweenclinicalsignificantandinsignificantprostatecancerwithapparentdiffusioncoefficientasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT surovalexey discriminationbetweenclinicalsignificantandinsignificantprostatecancerwithapparentdiffusioncoefficientasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis