Cargando…
Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis
BACKGROUND: Prostate MRI has become a corner stone in diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). Diffusion weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can be used to reflect tumor microstructure. The present analysis sought to compare ADC values of clinically insignificant with clinical si...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32460795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06942-x |
_version_ | 1783539589038735360 |
---|---|
author | Meyer, Hans-Jonas Wienke, Andreas Surov, Alexey |
author_facet | Meyer, Hans-Jonas Wienke, Andreas Surov, Alexey |
author_sort | Meyer, Hans-Jonas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Prostate MRI has become a corner stone in diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). Diffusion weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can be used to reflect tumor microstructure. The present analysis sought to compare ADC values of clinically insignificant with clinical significant PC based upon a large patient sample. METHODS: MEDLINE library and SCOPUS databases were screened for the associations between ADC and Gleason score (GS) in PC up to May 2019. The primary endpoint of the systematic review was the ADC value of PC groups according to Gleason score. In total 26 studies were suitable for the analysis and included into the present study. The included studies comprised a total of 1633 lesions. RESULTS: Clinically significant PCs (GS ≥ 7) were diagnosed in 1078 cases (66.0%) and insignificant PCs (GS 5 and 6) in 555 cases (34.0%). The pooled mean ADC value derived from monoexponenantially fitted ADC(mean) of the clinically significant PC was 0.86 × 10(− 3) mm(2)/s [95% CI 0.83–0.90] and the pooled mean value of insignificant PC was 1.1 × 10(− 3) mm(2)/s [95% CI 1.03–1.18]. Clinical significant PC showed lower ADC values compared to non-significant PC. The pooled ADC values of clinically insignificant PCs were no lower than 0.75 × 10(− 3) mm(2)/s. CONCLUSIONS: We evaluated the published literature comparing clinical insignificant with clinically prostate cancer in regard of the Apparent diffusion coefficient values derived from magnetic resonance imaging. We identified that the clinically insignificant prostate cancer have lower ADC values than clinically significant, which may aid in tumor noninvasive tumor characterization in clinical routine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7254689 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72546892020-06-07 Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis Meyer, Hans-Jonas Wienke, Andreas Surov, Alexey BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Prostate MRI has become a corner stone in diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). Diffusion weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can be used to reflect tumor microstructure. The present analysis sought to compare ADC values of clinically insignificant with clinical significant PC based upon a large patient sample. METHODS: MEDLINE library and SCOPUS databases were screened for the associations between ADC and Gleason score (GS) in PC up to May 2019. The primary endpoint of the systematic review was the ADC value of PC groups according to Gleason score. In total 26 studies were suitable for the analysis and included into the present study. The included studies comprised a total of 1633 lesions. RESULTS: Clinically significant PCs (GS ≥ 7) were diagnosed in 1078 cases (66.0%) and insignificant PCs (GS 5 and 6) in 555 cases (34.0%). The pooled mean ADC value derived from monoexponenantially fitted ADC(mean) of the clinically significant PC was 0.86 × 10(− 3) mm(2)/s [95% CI 0.83–0.90] and the pooled mean value of insignificant PC was 1.1 × 10(− 3) mm(2)/s [95% CI 1.03–1.18]. Clinical significant PC showed lower ADC values compared to non-significant PC. The pooled ADC values of clinically insignificant PCs were no lower than 0.75 × 10(− 3) mm(2)/s. CONCLUSIONS: We evaluated the published literature comparing clinical insignificant with clinically prostate cancer in regard of the Apparent diffusion coefficient values derived from magnetic resonance imaging. We identified that the clinically insignificant prostate cancer have lower ADC values than clinically significant, which may aid in tumor noninvasive tumor characterization in clinical routine. BioMed Central 2020-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7254689/ /pubmed/32460795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06942-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Meyer, Hans-Jonas Wienke, Andreas Surov, Alexey Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis |
title | Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis |
title_full | Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis |
title_fullStr | Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis |
title_short | Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis |
title_sort | discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient – a systematic review and meta analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32460795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06942-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meyerhansjonas discriminationbetweenclinicalsignificantandinsignificantprostatecancerwithapparentdiffusioncoefficientasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wienkeandreas discriminationbetweenclinicalsignificantandinsignificantprostatecancerwithapparentdiffusioncoefficientasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT surovalexey discriminationbetweenclinicalsignificantandinsignificantprostatecancerwithapparentdiffusioncoefficientasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |