Cargando…

Cardiac T2 mapping: robustness and homogeneity of standardized in-line analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Interpretation of T2 values remains difficult due to limited comparability across hardware and software systems and the lack of validated measurement recommendations for the number and orientation of mandatory slices. Our aims were to provide a standardized comparison of intr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiesmueller, Marco, Wuest, Wolfgang, Heiss, Rafael, Treutlein, Christoph, Uder, Michael, May, Matthias Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32460852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00619-x
_version_ 1783539597526958080
author Wiesmueller, Marco
Wuest, Wolfgang
Heiss, Rafael
Treutlein, Christoph
Uder, Michael
May, Matthias Stefan
author_facet Wiesmueller, Marco
Wuest, Wolfgang
Heiss, Rafael
Treutlein, Christoph
Uder, Michael
May, Matthias Stefan
author_sort Wiesmueller, Marco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Interpretation of T2 values remains difficult due to limited comparability across hardware and software systems and the lack of validated measurement recommendations for the number and orientation of mandatory slices. Our aims were to provide a standardized comparison of intra- and inter-individual T2 values in the short and long axes and to investigate inter-scanner reproducibility. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Ninety cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) studies in 30 healthy subjects were performed with three identical 1.5 T CMR scanners (same hardware and software) using a balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) gradient echo sequence in three short axis (SAx) and three long axis (LAx) views. A commercially available T2 mapping software package of the latest generation with automatic in-line motion correction was used for acquisition. Regions of interest were manually drawn in each of the 16 myocardial segments according to the American Heart Association (AHA) model in three SAx and three LAx acquisitions. Analysis of inter-scanner, inter-segmental, intra-segmental, inter-regional and inter-level differences was performed. RESULTS: Inter-scanner reproducibility was high and the mean myocardial T2 value for all evaluated segments was 45.7 ± 3.4 ms. Significant inter-segmental variations of mean T2 values were found. Mean intra-segmental T2 values were comparable between LAx and SAx acquisitions in 72%. Significantly higher T2 values were found in apical segments and a significant disparity among different regions was found for SAx and LAx orientations. CONCLUSION: Standardized cardiac T2 mapping is highly reproducible on identical CMR systems. T2 values vary significantly between single heart segments, regions, levels, and axes in young, healthy subjects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7254724
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72547242020-06-07 Cardiac T2 mapping: robustness and homogeneity of standardized in-line analysis Wiesmueller, Marco Wuest, Wolfgang Heiss, Rafael Treutlein, Christoph Uder, Michael May, Matthias Stefan J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Interpretation of T2 values remains difficult due to limited comparability across hardware and software systems and the lack of validated measurement recommendations for the number and orientation of mandatory slices. Our aims were to provide a standardized comparison of intra- and inter-individual T2 values in the short and long axes and to investigate inter-scanner reproducibility. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Ninety cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) studies in 30 healthy subjects were performed with three identical 1.5 T CMR scanners (same hardware and software) using a balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) gradient echo sequence in three short axis (SAx) and three long axis (LAx) views. A commercially available T2 mapping software package of the latest generation with automatic in-line motion correction was used for acquisition. Regions of interest were manually drawn in each of the 16 myocardial segments according to the American Heart Association (AHA) model in three SAx and three LAx acquisitions. Analysis of inter-scanner, inter-segmental, intra-segmental, inter-regional and inter-level differences was performed. RESULTS: Inter-scanner reproducibility was high and the mean myocardial T2 value for all evaluated segments was 45.7 ± 3.4 ms. Significant inter-segmental variations of mean T2 values were found. Mean intra-segmental T2 values were comparable between LAx and SAx acquisitions in 72%. Significantly higher T2 values were found in apical segments and a significant disparity among different regions was found for SAx and LAx orientations. CONCLUSION: Standardized cardiac T2 mapping is highly reproducible on identical CMR systems. T2 values vary significantly between single heart segments, regions, levels, and axes in young, healthy subjects. BioMed Central 2020-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7254724/ /pubmed/32460852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00619-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wiesmueller, Marco
Wuest, Wolfgang
Heiss, Rafael
Treutlein, Christoph
Uder, Michael
May, Matthias Stefan
Cardiac T2 mapping: robustness and homogeneity of standardized in-line analysis
title Cardiac T2 mapping: robustness and homogeneity of standardized in-line analysis
title_full Cardiac T2 mapping: robustness and homogeneity of standardized in-line analysis
title_fullStr Cardiac T2 mapping: robustness and homogeneity of standardized in-line analysis
title_full_unstemmed Cardiac T2 mapping: robustness and homogeneity of standardized in-line analysis
title_short Cardiac T2 mapping: robustness and homogeneity of standardized in-line analysis
title_sort cardiac t2 mapping: robustness and homogeneity of standardized in-line analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32460852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00619-x
work_keys_str_mv AT wiesmuellermarco cardiact2mappingrobustnessandhomogeneityofstandardizedinlineanalysis
AT wuestwolfgang cardiact2mappingrobustnessandhomogeneityofstandardizedinlineanalysis
AT heissrafael cardiact2mappingrobustnessandhomogeneityofstandardizedinlineanalysis
AT treutleinchristoph cardiact2mappingrobustnessandhomogeneityofstandardizedinlineanalysis
AT udermichael cardiact2mappingrobustnessandhomogeneityofstandardizedinlineanalysis
AT maymatthiasstefan cardiact2mappingrobustnessandhomogeneityofstandardizedinlineanalysis