Cargando…

Risk assessment of neuromuscular stimulation by energy-based transurethral resection devices: an ex vivo test standard

BACKGROUND: During transurethral resection of bladder tumours (TURB), radio-frequency (RF) currents can lead to adverse neuromuscular stimulation (NMS). Here we present a novel ex vivo method to determine the risk of RF generators and their bipolar TURB modes to cause NMS. We aimed to develop an exp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biber, Ulrich, Jurjut, Ovidiu, Enderle, Markus D., Aicher, Wilhelm K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32460737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-00630-5
_version_ 1783539603671613440
author Biber, Ulrich
Jurjut, Ovidiu
Enderle, Markus D.
Aicher, Wilhelm K.
author_facet Biber, Ulrich
Jurjut, Ovidiu
Enderle, Markus D.
Aicher, Wilhelm K.
author_sort Biber, Ulrich
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During transurethral resection of bladder tumours (TURB), radio-frequency (RF) currents can lead to adverse neuromuscular stimulation (NMS). Here we present a novel ex vivo method to determine the risk of RF generators and their bipolar TURB modes to cause NMS. We aimed to develop an experimental platform for safety evaluation of new RF generators and their modes with a newly established test standard, suitable for replacement or reduction of animal testing. METHODS: We tested four contemporary RF generators with their bipolar modes for TURB in saline. A two-stage ex vivo approach was pursued: First, we recorded voltages at possible positions of the obturator nerve behind a porcine bladder wall in a TURB model using 18 RF applications per generator. Second, these voltage records were used as stimuli to evoke nerve compound action potentials (CAPs) in isolated porcine axillary nerves. The NMS potential was defined as the ratio between the observed area under the CAPs and the theoretical CAP area at maximum response and a firing rate of 250 Hz, which would reliably induce tetanic muscle responses in most human subjects. The measurement protocol was tailored to optimise reproducibility of the obtained NMS potentials and longevity of the nerve specimens. RESULTS: As prerequisite for the clinical translation of our results, the robustness of our test method and reproducibility of the NMS potential are demonstrated with an excellent correlation (r = 0.93) between two sets of identical stimuli (n = 72 each) obtained from 16 nerve segments with similar diameters (4.2 ± 0.37 mm) in the nerve model. The RF generators differed significantly (p < 0.0001) regarding NMS potential (medians: 0–3%). CONCLUSIONS: Our test method is suitable for quantifying the NMS potential of different electrosurgical systems ex vivo with high selectivity at a reasonable degree of standardization and with justifiable effort. Our results suggest that the clinical incidence of NMS is considerably influenced by the type of RF generator. Future generations of RF generators take advantage from the proposed test standard through higher safety and less animal testing. Health professionals and treated patients will benefit most from improved RF surgery using generators with a low NMS risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7254752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72547522020-06-07 Risk assessment of neuromuscular stimulation by energy-based transurethral resection devices: an ex vivo test standard Biber, Ulrich Jurjut, Ovidiu Enderle, Markus D. Aicher, Wilhelm K. BMC Urol Technical Advance BACKGROUND: During transurethral resection of bladder tumours (TURB), radio-frequency (RF) currents can lead to adverse neuromuscular stimulation (NMS). Here we present a novel ex vivo method to determine the risk of RF generators and their bipolar TURB modes to cause NMS. We aimed to develop an experimental platform for safety evaluation of new RF generators and their modes with a newly established test standard, suitable for replacement or reduction of animal testing. METHODS: We tested four contemporary RF generators with their bipolar modes for TURB in saline. A two-stage ex vivo approach was pursued: First, we recorded voltages at possible positions of the obturator nerve behind a porcine bladder wall in a TURB model using 18 RF applications per generator. Second, these voltage records were used as stimuli to evoke nerve compound action potentials (CAPs) in isolated porcine axillary nerves. The NMS potential was defined as the ratio between the observed area under the CAPs and the theoretical CAP area at maximum response and a firing rate of 250 Hz, which would reliably induce tetanic muscle responses in most human subjects. The measurement protocol was tailored to optimise reproducibility of the obtained NMS potentials and longevity of the nerve specimens. RESULTS: As prerequisite for the clinical translation of our results, the robustness of our test method and reproducibility of the NMS potential are demonstrated with an excellent correlation (r = 0.93) between two sets of identical stimuli (n = 72 each) obtained from 16 nerve segments with similar diameters (4.2 ± 0.37 mm) in the nerve model. The RF generators differed significantly (p < 0.0001) regarding NMS potential (medians: 0–3%). CONCLUSIONS: Our test method is suitable for quantifying the NMS potential of different electrosurgical systems ex vivo with high selectivity at a reasonable degree of standardization and with justifiable effort. Our results suggest that the clinical incidence of NMS is considerably influenced by the type of RF generator. Future generations of RF generators take advantage from the proposed test standard through higher safety and less animal testing. Health professionals and treated patients will benefit most from improved RF surgery using generators with a low NMS risk. BioMed Central 2020-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7254752/ /pubmed/32460737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-00630-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Biber, Ulrich
Jurjut, Ovidiu
Enderle, Markus D.
Aicher, Wilhelm K.
Risk assessment of neuromuscular stimulation by energy-based transurethral resection devices: an ex vivo test standard
title Risk assessment of neuromuscular stimulation by energy-based transurethral resection devices: an ex vivo test standard
title_full Risk assessment of neuromuscular stimulation by energy-based transurethral resection devices: an ex vivo test standard
title_fullStr Risk assessment of neuromuscular stimulation by energy-based transurethral resection devices: an ex vivo test standard
title_full_unstemmed Risk assessment of neuromuscular stimulation by energy-based transurethral resection devices: an ex vivo test standard
title_short Risk assessment of neuromuscular stimulation by energy-based transurethral resection devices: an ex vivo test standard
title_sort risk assessment of neuromuscular stimulation by energy-based transurethral resection devices: an ex vivo test standard
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32460737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-00630-5
work_keys_str_mv AT biberulrich riskassessmentofneuromuscularstimulationbyenergybasedtransurethralresectiondevicesanexvivoteststandard
AT jurjutovidiu riskassessmentofneuromuscularstimulationbyenergybasedtransurethralresectiondevicesanexvivoteststandard
AT enderlemarkusd riskassessmentofneuromuscularstimulationbyenergybasedtransurethralresectiondevicesanexvivoteststandard
AT aicherwilhelmk riskassessmentofneuromuscularstimulationbyenergybasedtransurethralresectiondevicesanexvivoteststandard