Cargando…

Personal preferences of participation in fall prevention programmes: a descriptive study

BACKGROUND: Participation in fall prevention programmes is associated with lower risk of injurious falls among older adults. However participation rates in fall prevention interventions are low. The limited participation in fall prevention might increase with a preference based approach. Therefore,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barmentloo, Lotte M., Olij, Branko F., Erasmus, Vicki, Smilde, Dini, Schoon, Yvonne, Polinder, Suzanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32466747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01586-9
_version_ 1783539606328705024
author Barmentloo, Lotte M.
Olij, Branko F.
Erasmus, Vicki
Smilde, Dini
Schoon, Yvonne
Polinder, Suzanne
author_facet Barmentloo, Lotte M.
Olij, Branko F.
Erasmus, Vicki
Smilde, Dini
Schoon, Yvonne
Polinder, Suzanne
author_sort Barmentloo, Lotte M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Participation in fall prevention programmes is associated with lower risk of injurious falls among older adults. However participation rates in fall prevention interventions are low. The limited participation in fall prevention might increase with a preference based approach. Therefore, the aims of this study are to a) determine the personal preferences of older adults regarding fall prevention and b) explore the association between personal preferences and participation. METHODS: We assessed the personal preferences of older adults and the association between their preferences, chosen programme and participation level. Nine different programmes, with a focus on those best matching their personal preferences, were offered to participants. Twelve weeks after the start of the programme, participation was assessed by questionnaire. Logistic regression was performed to test the association between preferences and participation and an ANOVA was performed to assess differences between the number of preferences included in the chosen programme and participation level. RESULTS: Of the 134 participants, 49% preferred to exercise at home versus 43% elsewhere, 46% preferred to exercise alone versus 44% in a group and 41% indicated a programme must be free of charge while 51% were willing to pay. The combination of an external location, in a group and for a fee was preferred by 27%, whereas 26% preferred at home, alone and only for free. The presence of preferences or the extent to which the programme matched earlier preferences was not associated with participation. CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that preferences can vary greatly among older adults, local programmes should be available for at least the two largest subgroups. This includes a programme at home, offered individually and for free. In addition, local healthcare providers should cooperate to increase the accessibility of currently available group programmes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7254764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72547642020-06-07 Personal preferences of participation in fall prevention programmes: a descriptive study Barmentloo, Lotte M. Olij, Branko F. Erasmus, Vicki Smilde, Dini Schoon, Yvonne Polinder, Suzanne BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Participation in fall prevention programmes is associated with lower risk of injurious falls among older adults. However participation rates in fall prevention interventions are low. The limited participation in fall prevention might increase with a preference based approach. Therefore, the aims of this study are to a) determine the personal preferences of older adults regarding fall prevention and b) explore the association between personal preferences and participation. METHODS: We assessed the personal preferences of older adults and the association between their preferences, chosen programme and participation level. Nine different programmes, with a focus on those best matching their personal preferences, were offered to participants. Twelve weeks after the start of the programme, participation was assessed by questionnaire. Logistic regression was performed to test the association between preferences and participation and an ANOVA was performed to assess differences between the number of preferences included in the chosen programme and participation level. RESULTS: Of the 134 participants, 49% preferred to exercise at home versus 43% elsewhere, 46% preferred to exercise alone versus 44% in a group and 41% indicated a programme must be free of charge while 51% were willing to pay. The combination of an external location, in a group and for a fee was preferred by 27%, whereas 26% preferred at home, alone and only for free. The presence of preferences or the extent to which the programme matched earlier preferences was not associated with participation. CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that preferences can vary greatly among older adults, local programmes should be available for at least the two largest subgroups. This includes a programme at home, offered individually and for free. In addition, local healthcare providers should cooperate to increase the accessibility of currently available group programmes. BioMed Central 2020-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7254764/ /pubmed/32466747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01586-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Barmentloo, Lotte M.
Olij, Branko F.
Erasmus, Vicki
Smilde, Dini
Schoon, Yvonne
Polinder, Suzanne
Personal preferences of participation in fall prevention programmes: a descriptive study
title Personal preferences of participation in fall prevention programmes: a descriptive study
title_full Personal preferences of participation in fall prevention programmes: a descriptive study
title_fullStr Personal preferences of participation in fall prevention programmes: a descriptive study
title_full_unstemmed Personal preferences of participation in fall prevention programmes: a descriptive study
title_short Personal preferences of participation in fall prevention programmes: a descriptive study
title_sort personal preferences of participation in fall prevention programmes: a descriptive study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32466747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01586-9
work_keys_str_mv AT barmentloolottem personalpreferencesofparticipationinfallpreventionprogrammesadescriptivestudy
AT olijbrankof personalpreferencesofparticipationinfallpreventionprogrammesadescriptivestudy
AT erasmusvicki personalpreferencesofparticipationinfallpreventionprogrammesadescriptivestudy
AT smildedini personalpreferencesofparticipationinfallpreventionprogrammesadescriptivestudy
AT schoonyvonne personalpreferencesofparticipationinfallpreventionprogrammesadescriptivestudy
AT polindersuzanne personalpreferencesofparticipationinfallpreventionprogrammesadescriptivestudy