Cargando…
The First Additional Port During Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has become increasingly popular. Regarding the difficulties of SILC in acute cholecystitis, additional port insertion is sometimes required. However, appropriate locations for additional port insertion have not been well...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32518480 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2020.00024 |
_version_ | 1783539627893719040 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Ju-Hee Kim, Gangmi |
author_facet | Lee, Ju-Hee Kim, Gangmi |
author_sort | Lee, Ju-Hee |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has become increasingly popular. Regarding the difficulties of SILC in acute cholecystitis, additional port insertion is sometimes required. However, appropriate locations for additional port insertion have not been well studied. In the present study, the safety and effectiveness of the first additional port insertion in the epigastric region during SILC was assessed. METHODS: Additional port insertions were needed in 52 of 113 patients who underwent SILC for acute cholecystitis. The first port was inserted in the epigastric region and the second (if required) was inserted in the right lateral subcostal area. A drainage catheter was positioned through the epigastric port. RESULTS: One additional port was inserted in 43 patients and two additional ports were inserted in 9 patients. Mean operation time was 45.0 minutes in the Pure SILC group and 83.3 minutes in Additional Port group. Mean hospital stay was 3.7 days in the Pure SILC group and 5.9 days in Additional Port group. There was no open conversion. Intra-operative (n = 5) and postoperative bile leakages (n = 2) were identified in six patients. Timing of operation after onset of symptoms was significantly greater in the group with bile duct injury than in those without bile duct injury in patients who required additional ports. CONCLUSIONS: The first additional port in the epigastric area during SILC for acute cholecystitis helps to complete the operation without open conversion. However, the procedure can be performed safely in selective patients with relatively short duration of symptoms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7254861 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72548612020-06-08 The First Additional Port During Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Lee, Ju-Hee Kim, Gangmi JSLS Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has become increasingly popular. Regarding the difficulties of SILC in acute cholecystitis, additional port insertion is sometimes required. However, appropriate locations for additional port insertion have not been well studied. In the present study, the safety and effectiveness of the first additional port insertion in the epigastric region during SILC was assessed. METHODS: Additional port insertions were needed in 52 of 113 patients who underwent SILC for acute cholecystitis. The first port was inserted in the epigastric region and the second (if required) was inserted in the right lateral subcostal area. A drainage catheter was positioned through the epigastric port. RESULTS: One additional port was inserted in 43 patients and two additional ports were inserted in 9 patients. Mean operation time was 45.0 minutes in the Pure SILC group and 83.3 minutes in Additional Port group. Mean hospital stay was 3.7 days in the Pure SILC group and 5.9 days in Additional Port group. There was no open conversion. Intra-operative (n = 5) and postoperative bile leakages (n = 2) were identified in six patients. Timing of operation after onset of symptoms was significantly greater in the group with bile duct injury than in those without bile duct injury in patients who required additional ports. CONCLUSIONS: The first additional port in the epigastric area during SILC for acute cholecystitis helps to complete the operation without open conversion. However, the procedure can be performed safely in selective patients with relatively short duration of symptoms. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7254861/ /pubmed/32518480 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2020.00024 Text en © 2020 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lee, Ju-Hee Kim, Gangmi The First Additional Port During Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title | The First Additional Port During Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title_full | The First Additional Port During Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title_fullStr | The First Additional Port During Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | The First Additional Port During Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title_short | The First Additional Port During Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title_sort | first additional port during single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32518480 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2020.00024 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leejuhee thefirstadditionalportduringsingleincisionlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT kimgangmi thefirstadditionalportduringsingleincisionlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT leejuhee firstadditionalportduringsingleincisionlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT kimgangmi firstadditionalportduringsingleincisionlaparoscopiccholecystectomy |