Cargando…

Evaluation of novel serological markers and autoantibodies in dogs with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND: The use of serological markers to diagnose inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in humans is well‐established. Because of the frequency of IBD in dogs and resources required for its diagnosis with current methods, new approaches are desired. OBJECTIVE: The goal is to evaluate novel serologic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Estruch, Juan J., Barken, Derren, Bennett, Nicole, Krawiec, Donald K., Ogilvie, Gregory K., Powers, Barbara E., Polansky, Benjamin J., Sueda, Michael T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7255684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32282988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15761
_version_ 1783539777053655040
author Estruch, Juan J.
Barken, Derren
Bennett, Nicole
Krawiec, Donald K.
Ogilvie, Gregory K.
Powers, Barbara E.
Polansky, Benjamin J.
Sueda, Michael T.
author_facet Estruch, Juan J.
Barken, Derren
Bennett, Nicole
Krawiec, Donald K.
Ogilvie, Gregory K.
Powers, Barbara E.
Polansky, Benjamin J.
Sueda, Michael T.
author_sort Estruch, Juan J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of serological markers to diagnose inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in humans is well‐established. Because of the frequency of IBD in dogs and resources required for its diagnosis with current methods, new approaches are desired. OBJECTIVE: The goal is to evaluate novel serologic markers to differentiate clinical cohorts in dogs with gastrointestinal (GI) disease and assess their potential to develop a serum‐based IBD diagnostic test. ANIMALS: Seventy dogs diagnosed with biopsy‐confirmed IBD, 23 dogs with non‐IBD predominantly acute GI diseases, and 58 normal dogs. METHODS: Prospective control study. ELISA methods were developed to detect autoantibodies to polymorphonuclear leukocytes (APMNA) and calprotectin (ACNA), antibodies against gliadins (AGA), microbial outer membrane porin C (ACA), and flagellins (AFA) isolated from diseased dogs based on clinical and histopathological scoring. RESULTS: IBD dogs displayed a 39%‐76% prevalence of seropositivity against selected serologic markers that markedly decreased to 0%‐13% in non‐IBD and normal dogs. ROC analysis showed statistical significance in differentiating the cohorts, with seropositivity against OmpC being the highest single performance marker. The combination of markers such as OmpC and APMNA reached specificities of 93%‐99% and 79%‐98% and sensitivities of 76%‐97% and 66%‐86% when comparing IBD versus normal cohorts and non‐IBD cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Seropositivity of canine immunoglobulins A against selected serologic markers in dogs appears promising in the detection and differentiation of IBD versus other acute GI conditions. Among them, antibody reactivity to Escherichia coli OmpC and canine autoantibodies against polymorphonuclear leukocytes displayed the highest single marker discriminating performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7255684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72556842020-06-01 Evaluation of novel serological markers and autoantibodies in dogs with inflammatory bowel disease Estruch, Juan J. Barken, Derren Bennett, Nicole Krawiec, Donald K. Ogilvie, Gregory K. Powers, Barbara E. Polansky, Benjamin J. Sueda, Michael T. J Vet Intern Med SMALL ANIMAL BACKGROUND: The use of serological markers to diagnose inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in humans is well‐established. Because of the frequency of IBD in dogs and resources required for its diagnosis with current methods, new approaches are desired. OBJECTIVE: The goal is to evaluate novel serologic markers to differentiate clinical cohorts in dogs with gastrointestinal (GI) disease and assess their potential to develop a serum‐based IBD diagnostic test. ANIMALS: Seventy dogs diagnosed with biopsy‐confirmed IBD, 23 dogs with non‐IBD predominantly acute GI diseases, and 58 normal dogs. METHODS: Prospective control study. ELISA methods were developed to detect autoantibodies to polymorphonuclear leukocytes (APMNA) and calprotectin (ACNA), antibodies against gliadins (AGA), microbial outer membrane porin C (ACA), and flagellins (AFA) isolated from diseased dogs based on clinical and histopathological scoring. RESULTS: IBD dogs displayed a 39%‐76% prevalence of seropositivity against selected serologic markers that markedly decreased to 0%‐13% in non‐IBD and normal dogs. ROC analysis showed statistical significance in differentiating the cohorts, with seropositivity against OmpC being the highest single performance marker. The combination of markers such as OmpC and APMNA reached specificities of 93%‐99% and 79%‐98% and sensitivities of 76%‐97% and 66%‐86% when comparing IBD versus normal cohorts and non‐IBD cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Seropositivity of canine immunoglobulins A against selected serologic markers in dogs appears promising in the detection and differentiation of IBD versus other acute GI conditions. Among them, antibody reactivity to Escherichia coli OmpC and canine autoantibodies against polymorphonuclear leukocytes displayed the highest single marker discriminating performance. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-04-13 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7255684/ /pubmed/32282988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15761 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle SMALL ANIMAL
Estruch, Juan J.
Barken, Derren
Bennett, Nicole
Krawiec, Donald K.
Ogilvie, Gregory K.
Powers, Barbara E.
Polansky, Benjamin J.
Sueda, Michael T.
Evaluation of novel serological markers and autoantibodies in dogs with inflammatory bowel disease
title Evaluation of novel serological markers and autoantibodies in dogs with inflammatory bowel disease
title_full Evaluation of novel serological markers and autoantibodies in dogs with inflammatory bowel disease
title_fullStr Evaluation of novel serological markers and autoantibodies in dogs with inflammatory bowel disease
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of novel serological markers and autoantibodies in dogs with inflammatory bowel disease
title_short Evaluation of novel serological markers and autoantibodies in dogs with inflammatory bowel disease
title_sort evaluation of novel serological markers and autoantibodies in dogs with inflammatory bowel disease
topic SMALL ANIMAL
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7255684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32282988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15761
work_keys_str_mv AT estruchjuanj evaluationofnovelserologicalmarkersandautoantibodiesindogswithinflammatoryboweldisease
AT barkenderren evaluationofnovelserologicalmarkersandautoantibodiesindogswithinflammatoryboweldisease
AT bennettnicole evaluationofnovelserologicalmarkersandautoantibodiesindogswithinflammatoryboweldisease
AT krawiecdonaldk evaluationofnovelserologicalmarkersandautoantibodiesindogswithinflammatoryboweldisease
AT ogilviegregoryk evaluationofnovelserologicalmarkersandautoantibodiesindogswithinflammatoryboweldisease
AT powersbarbarae evaluationofnovelserologicalmarkersandautoantibodiesindogswithinflammatoryboweldisease
AT polanskybenjaminj evaluationofnovelserologicalmarkersandautoantibodiesindogswithinflammatoryboweldisease
AT suedamichaelt evaluationofnovelserologicalmarkersandautoantibodiesindogswithinflammatoryboweldisease