Cargando…

An update of posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy – Case series

INTRODUCTION: Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA) has advantages over transperitoneal approach. A second group of 10 patients is analyzed and compared with the first 10 procedures. Conclusions on feasibility, safety and learning curve are taken. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Costa Almeida, Carlos E., Caroço, Teresa, Silva, Marta A., Baião, José M., Costa, Ana, Albano, Miguel N., Louro, João M., Carvalho, Luis F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7256207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32446990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.04.101
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA) has advantages over transperitoneal approach. A second group of 10 patients is analyzed and compared with the first 10 procedures. Conclusions on feasibility, safety and learning curve are taken. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a second group of 10 patients submitted to PRA was conducted. All patients with functioning and non-functioning adrenal tumors <6–8 cm and without features of malignancy were included. A comparison with the previous 10 cases was conducted, and the results of all 20 cases were compared with other surgeons. RESULTS: Pre-operative diagnoses: Conn’s syndrome – 8 (80%); Pheochromocytoma – 1 (10%); Non-functioning tumor (≥ 4 cm) – 1 (10%). Mean size of adrenal tumors was 2,9 cm. Mean operative time for first group was 46,7 min and 31,1 min for the second (p = 0,036). Postoperative in-hospital days decreased in the second group (p = 0,01). Conversion rate was equal (10%). Morbidity and mortality were similar. DISCUSSION: Comparing the evolution of operative time in both groups, a constant and faster operative time was noted for the second group and a decreasing linear tendency was noted as more cases were being performed. Postoperative in-hospital days lowered in the second group, because with experience we started discharging patients earlier. Outcomes are stable between both groups. Our results match other authors data. CONCLUSION: These results are consistent with our first report and support the small learning curve for PRA, which is technically feasible and safe. Operative time and in-hospital days are influenced by surgeon’s experience. More cases need to be collected so that these results can be validated.