Cargando…

Evaluation of breast screening strategies in a high risk breast and ovarian cancer clinic

Recent data suggest that BRCA mutation carriers younger than 40 may not benefit from mammography in addition to MRI. Our objective was to evaluate screening modalities utilized in a high-risk population. Clinicopathologic data were abstracted for patients followed in a high risk clinic from 2007 to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knisely, Anne T., Stewart, Martha E., Garcia, Christine, Thomas, Martha H., Modesitt, Susan C., Ring, Kari L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7256456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32490124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2020.100587
_version_ 1783539912816984064
author Knisely, Anne T.
Stewart, Martha E.
Garcia, Christine
Thomas, Martha H.
Modesitt, Susan C.
Ring, Kari L.
author_facet Knisely, Anne T.
Stewart, Martha E.
Garcia, Christine
Thomas, Martha H.
Modesitt, Susan C.
Ring, Kari L.
author_sort Knisely, Anne T.
collection PubMed
description Recent data suggest that BRCA mutation carriers younger than 40 may not benefit from mammography in addition to MRI. Our objective was to evaluate screening modalities utilized in a high-risk population. Clinicopathologic data were abstracted for patients followed in a high risk clinic from 2007 to 2017. Descriptive statistics were calculated and associations between categorical variables were evaluated using chi-square tests. 631 women comprised the study population; 496 patients had no known mutation (79%), 128 (20%) had a BRCA mutation, and 7 patients had other deleterious mutations. BRCA mutation carriers were more likely to have cancers diagnosed after mammogram callbacks (p = 0.0046) and biopsies (p = 0.0026) compared to non-BRCA mutation carriers. BRCA mutation carriers were also more likely to have cancers diagnosed after biopsies following screening MRI (p = 0.045). 13 BRCA patients were diagnosed with cancer (average age 51). Of the cancers diagnosed after abnormal MRI, 3 were DCIS; all 3 patients had a normal mammogram 4–6 months prior. In those found after abnormal mammogram (n = 6), follow up MRI was performed in 4 cases; all demonstrated the lesion. Three patients were diagnosed younger than 40, 1 on mammogram and 2 on MRI. The patient diagnosed on mammogram had no prior MRI and the lesion was seen on follow-up MRI. Interval screening MRI identified DCIS in BRCA patients with a previous normal mammogram and cancers diagnosed on mammogram were all identified on follow-up MRI. These findings support further evaluation of MRI alone until age 40 in BRCA mutation carriers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7256456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72564562020-06-01 Evaluation of breast screening strategies in a high risk breast and ovarian cancer clinic Knisely, Anne T. Stewart, Martha E. Garcia, Christine Thomas, Martha H. Modesitt, Susan C. Ring, Kari L. Gynecol Oncol Rep Case Series Recent data suggest that BRCA mutation carriers younger than 40 may not benefit from mammography in addition to MRI. Our objective was to evaluate screening modalities utilized in a high-risk population. Clinicopathologic data were abstracted for patients followed in a high risk clinic from 2007 to 2017. Descriptive statistics were calculated and associations between categorical variables were evaluated using chi-square tests. 631 women comprised the study population; 496 patients had no known mutation (79%), 128 (20%) had a BRCA mutation, and 7 patients had other deleterious mutations. BRCA mutation carriers were more likely to have cancers diagnosed after mammogram callbacks (p = 0.0046) and biopsies (p = 0.0026) compared to non-BRCA mutation carriers. BRCA mutation carriers were also more likely to have cancers diagnosed after biopsies following screening MRI (p = 0.045). 13 BRCA patients were diagnosed with cancer (average age 51). Of the cancers diagnosed after abnormal MRI, 3 were DCIS; all 3 patients had a normal mammogram 4–6 months prior. In those found after abnormal mammogram (n = 6), follow up MRI was performed in 4 cases; all demonstrated the lesion. Three patients were diagnosed younger than 40, 1 on mammogram and 2 on MRI. The patient diagnosed on mammogram had no prior MRI and the lesion was seen on follow-up MRI. Interval screening MRI identified DCIS in BRCA patients with a previous normal mammogram and cancers diagnosed on mammogram were all identified on follow-up MRI. These findings support further evaluation of MRI alone until age 40 in BRCA mutation carriers. Elsevier 2020-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7256456/ /pubmed/32490124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2020.100587 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Series
Knisely, Anne T.
Stewart, Martha E.
Garcia, Christine
Thomas, Martha H.
Modesitt, Susan C.
Ring, Kari L.
Evaluation of breast screening strategies in a high risk breast and ovarian cancer clinic
title Evaluation of breast screening strategies in a high risk breast and ovarian cancer clinic
title_full Evaluation of breast screening strategies in a high risk breast and ovarian cancer clinic
title_fullStr Evaluation of breast screening strategies in a high risk breast and ovarian cancer clinic
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of breast screening strategies in a high risk breast and ovarian cancer clinic
title_short Evaluation of breast screening strategies in a high risk breast and ovarian cancer clinic
title_sort evaluation of breast screening strategies in a high risk breast and ovarian cancer clinic
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7256456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32490124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2020.100587
work_keys_str_mv AT kniselyannet evaluationofbreastscreeningstrategiesinahighriskbreastandovariancancerclinic
AT stewartmarthae evaluationofbreastscreeningstrategiesinahighriskbreastandovariancancerclinic
AT garciachristine evaluationofbreastscreeningstrategiesinahighriskbreastandovariancancerclinic
AT thomasmarthah evaluationofbreastscreeningstrategiesinahighriskbreastandovariancancerclinic
AT modesittsusanc evaluationofbreastscreeningstrategiesinahighriskbreastandovariancancerclinic
AT ringkaril evaluationofbreastscreeningstrategiesinahighriskbreastandovariancancerclinic