Cargando…

Significance of Infections in Implant Loss After Breast Reconstruction in the Course of Breast Cancer Treatment

The aim of the study was to analyze the reasons for removing implants after breast reconstruction in the course of treatment of breast cancer. The study involved 428 patients, who underwent a total of 648 breast reconstruction procedures using artificial implants. 47 out of 648 cases (7.3%) were ide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: SZYMANKIEWICZ, MARIA, NOWIKIEWICZ, TOMASZ, BIEDKA, MARTA
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Exeley Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7256728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31880880
http://dx.doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2019-037
_version_ 1783539975860518912
author SZYMANKIEWICZ, MARIA
NOWIKIEWICZ, TOMASZ
BIEDKA, MARTA
author_facet SZYMANKIEWICZ, MARIA
NOWIKIEWICZ, TOMASZ
BIEDKA, MARTA
author_sort SZYMANKIEWICZ, MARIA
collection PubMed
description The aim of the study was to analyze the reasons for removing implants after breast reconstruction in the course of treatment of breast cancer. The study involved 428 patients, who underwent a total of 648 breast reconstruction procedures using artificial implants. 47 out of 648 cases (7.3%) were identified in which the implant had to be removed. Of the 47 cases, 57.4% had undergone deferred reconstruction, and 42.6% immediate reconstruction; 27.7% had undergone pre-operative chemotherapy and radiotherapy, 27.7% pre-operative chemotherapy, and 2.1% pre-operative radiotherapy; 6.4% were diabetic, 4.3% active smokers, and more than 50.0% had BMI greater than 25 kg/m(2). In 83.0% of the analyzed cases, the reason for removal of the implant was infection, in 8.5% it was local recurrence of breast cancer, in 4.3% it was damage (leakage) of the implant, and in 2.1% it was post-operative pain. About 87.0% of infections appeared within one year of implantation; however, less than a half developed within 90 days of the reconstructive surgery, and up to 30 days only about 13.0% had appeared. Among the etiological agents of infections were: coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (31.3%), Staphylococcus aureus (18.7%), Enterococcus faecalis (9.4%), Enterobacter cloacae (18.8%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12.5%), Acinetobacter lwoffii (3.1%), and other Gram-negative fermenting rods accounted for 6.2%. Infections were the most common reason for removing the implant after breast reconstruction. and occurred most often as late infections (>30 days after surgery). The time of observation for infectious complications should be at least 1 year.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7256728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Exeley Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72567282020-06-03 Significance of Infections in Implant Loss After Breast Reconstruction in the Course of Breast Cancer Treatment SZYMANKIEWICZ, MARIA NOWIKIEWICZ, TOMASZ BIEDKA, MARTA Pol J Microbiol Microbiology The aim of the study was to analyze the reasons for removing implants after breast reconstruction in the course of treatment of breast cancer. The study involved 428 patients, who underwent a total of 648 breast reconstruction procedures using artificial implants. 47 out of 648 cases (7.3%) were identified in which the implant had to be removed. Of the 47 cases, 57.4% had undergone deferred reconstruction, and 42.6% immediate reconstruction; 27.7% had undergone pre-operative chemotherapy and radiotherapy, 27.7% pre-operative chemotherapy, and 2.1% pre-operative radiotherapy; 6.4% were diabetic, 4.3% active smokers, and more than 50.0% had BMI greater than 25 kg/m(2). In 83.0% of the analyzed cases, the reason for removal of the implant was infection, in 8.5% it was local recurrence of breast cancer, in 4.3% it was damage (leakage) of the implant, and in 2.1% it was post-operative pain. About 87.0% of infections appeared within one year of implantation; however, less than a half developed within 90 days of the reconstructive surgery, and up to 30 days only about 13.0% had appeared. Among the etiological agents of infections were: coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (31.3%), Staphylococcus aureus (18.7%), Enterococcus faecalis (9.4%), Enterobacter cloacae (18.8%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12.5%), Acinetobacter lwoffii (3.1%), and other Gram-negative fermenting rods accounted for 6.2%. Infections were the most common reason for removing the implant after breast reconstruction. and occurred most often as late infections (>30 days after surgery). The time of observation for infectious complications should be at least 1 year. Exeley Inc. 2019-09 2019-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7256728/ /pubmed/31880880 http://dx.doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2019-037 Text en © 2019 Maria Szymankiewicz et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Microbiology
SZYMANKIEWICZ, MARIA
NOWIKIEWICZ, TOMASZ
BIEDKA, MARTA
Significance of Infections in Implant Loss After Breast Reconstruction in the Course of Breast Cancer Treatment
title Significance of Infections in Implant Loss After Breast Reconstruction in the Course of Breast Cancer Treatment
title_full Significance of Infections in Implant Loss After Breast Reconstruction in the Course of Breast Cancer Treatment
title_fullStr Significance of Infections in Implant Loss After Breast Reconstruction in the Course of Breast Cancer Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Significance of Infections in Implant Loss After Breast Reconstruction in the Course of Breast Cancer Treatment
title_short Significance of Infections in Implant Loss After Breast Reconstruction in the Course of Breast Cancer Treatment
title_sort significance of infections in implant loss after breast reconstruction in the course of breast cancer treatment
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7256728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31880880
http://dx.doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2019-037
work_keys_str_mv AT szymankiewiczmaria significanceofinfectionsinimplantlossafterbreastreconstructioninthecourseofbreastcancertreatment
AT nowikiewicztomasz significanceofinfectionsinimplantlossafterbreastreconstructioninthecourseofbreastcancertreatment
AT biedkamarta significanceofinfectionsinimplantlossafterbreastreconstructioninthecourseofbreastcancertreatment