Cargando…

Biomechanical assessment of lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair and reconstruction with or without internal brace augmentation

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) using primary repair or reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament complex have proven inconsistent. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that augmentation of LUCL repair or palmaris longus tendon reconstruction u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Melbourne, Craig, Cook, James L., Della Rocca, Gregory J., Loftis, Christopher, Konicek, John, Smith, Matthew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7256890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32490406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.01.011
_version_ 1783540010683727872
author Melbourne, Craig
Cook, James L.
Della Rocca, Gregory J.
Loftis, Christopher
Konicek, John
Smith, Matthew J.
author_facet Melbourne, Craig
Cook, James L.
Della Rocca, Gregory J.
Loftis, Christopher
Konicek, John
Smith, Matthew J.
author_sort Melbourne, Craig
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) using primary repair or reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament complex have proven inconsistent. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that augmentation of LUCL repair or palmaris longus tendon reconstruction using a suture tape augmentation would be associated with less rotational displacement and greater torque load to failure (LTF) compared with nonaugmented constructs. METHODS: Cadaveric elbows (n = 12 matched pairs) were used. Baseline stiffness and displacement values were obtained. The LUCL was transected followed by repair alone, repair with augmentation, reconstruction with palmaris longus graft, or reconstruction with augmentation. Specimens were retested including torque LTF. Paired t tests were performed to assess the biomechanical effects of augmentation. RESULTS: Augmentation was associated with higher LTF than repair and reconstruction alone (P = .008 and .047, respectively). Displacement was less with augmentation in reconstruction groups (P = .048) but not in repair groups. Suture tape augmentation maintained rotational stiffness better than repair alone (P = .01). Although reconstruction with augmentation maintained rotational stiffness better than nonaugmented reconstruction, the differences were not statistically significant (P = .057). Mode of failure for repair alone was predominantly suture pulling through repaired ligament. Augmented repairs primarily failed at the anchor-bone interface. Modes of failure for both reconstruction groups were similar, including graft tearing and/or slipping at the anchor. CONCLUSION: When positioned in neutral forearm rotation and 90(o) of flexion to simulate postoperative conditions, augmentation of LUCL repair or tendon reconstruction using suture tape is associated with better resistance to rotational loads compared with nonaugmented repair or reconstruction, while maintaining near-native rotational stiffness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7256890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72568902020-06-01 Biomechanical assessment of lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair and reconstruction with or without internal brace augmentation Melbourne, Craig Cook, James L. Della Rocca, Gregory J. Loftis, Christopher Konicek, John Smith, Matthew J. JSES Int Article BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) using primary repair or reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament complex have proven inconsistent. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that augmentation of LUCL repair or palmaris longus tendon reconstruction using a suture tape augmentation would be associated with less rotational displacement and greater torque load to failure (LTF) compared with nonaugmented constructs. METHODS: Cadaveric elbows (n = 12 matched pairs) were used. Baseline stiffness and displacement values were obtained. The LUCL was transected followed by repair alone, repair with augmentation, reconstruction with palmaris longus graft, or reconstruction with augmentation. Specimens were retested including torque LTF. Paired t tests were performed to assess the biomechanical effects of augmentation. RESULTS: Augmentation was associated with higher LTF than repair and reconstruction alone (P = .008 and .047, respectively). Displacement was less with augmentation in reconstruction groups (P = .048) but not in repair groups. Suture tape augmentation maintained rotational stiffness better than repair alone (P = .01). Although reconstruction with augmentation maintained rotational stiffness better than nonaugmented reconstruction, the differences were not statistically significant (P = .057). Mode of failure for repair alone was predominantly suture pulling through repaired ligament. Augmented repairs primarily failed at the anchor-bone interface. Modes of failure for both reconstruction groups were similar, including graft tearing and/or slipping at the anchor. CONCLUSION: When positioned in neutral forearm rotation and 90(o) of flexion to simulate postoperative conditions, augmentation of LUCL repair or tendon reconstruction using suture tape is associated with better resistance to rotational loads compared with nonaugmented repair or reconstruction, while maintaining near-native rotational stiffness. Elsevier 2020-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7256890/ /pubmed/32490406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.01.011 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Melbourne, Craig
Cook, James L.
Della Rocca, Gregory J.
Loftis, Christopher
Konicek, John
Smith, Matthew J.
Biomechanical assessment of lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair and reconstruction with or without internal brace augmentation
title Biomechanical assessment of lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair and reconstruction with or without internal brace augmentation
title_full Biomechanical assessment of lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair and reconstruction with or without internal brace augmentation
title_fullStr Biomechanical assessment of lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair and reconstruction with or without internal brace augmentation
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical assessment of lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair and reconstruction with or without internal brace augmentation
title_short Biomechanical assessment of lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair and reconstruction with or without internal brace augmentation
title_sort biomechanical assessment of lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair and reconstruction with or without internal brace augmentation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7256890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32490406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.01.011
work_keys_str_mv AT melbournecraig biomechanicalassessmentoflateralulnarcollateralligamentrepairandreconstructionwithorwithoutinternalbraceaugmentation
AT cookjamesl biomechanicalassessmentoflateralulnarcollateralligamentrepairandreconstructionwithorwithoutinternalbraceaugmentation
AT dellaroccagregoryj biomechanicalassessmentoflateralulnarcollateralligamentrepairandreconstructionwithorwithoutinternalbraceaugmentation
AT loftischristopher biomechanicalassessmentoflateralulnarcollateralligamentrepairandreconstructionwithorwithoutinternalbraceaugmentation
AT konicekjohn biomechanicalassessmentoflateralulnarcollateralligamentrepairandreconstructionwithorwithoutinternalbraceaugmentation
AT smithmatthewj biomechanicalassessmentoflateralulnarcollateralligamentrepairandreconstructionwithorwithoutinternalbraceaugmentation