Cargando…

Modified Isshiki’s arytenoid adduction without separating cricothyroid and cricoarytenoid joints

Modified methods of arytenoid adduction (AA) have been reported to keep the cricothyroid (CT) joint intact. However, postoperative laryngeal oedema and long-term vocal function have not been compared with those after AA with CT joint separation. We refined AA to combine it with nerve-muscle pedicle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yumoto, Eiji, Sanuki, Tetsuji, Kumai, Yoshihiko, Kodama, Narihiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pacini Editore Srl 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7256903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32469003
http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N0183
_version_ 1783540013499154432
author Yumoto, Eiji
Sanuki, Tetsuji
Kumai, Yoshihiko
Kodama, Narihiro
author_facet Yumoto, Eiji
Sanuki, Tetsuji
Kumai, Yoshihiko
Kodama, Narihiro
author_sort Yumoto, Eiji
collection PubMed
description Modified methods of arytenoid adduction (AA) have been reported to keep the cricothyroid (CT) joint intact. However, postoperative laryngeal oedema and long-term vocal function have not been compared with those after AA with CT joint separation. We refined AA to combine it with nerve-muscle pedicle (NMP) flap transfer for preservation of the CT joint. Eight patients with unilateral laryngeal paralysis underwent the procedure (Group 1). Postoperative oedema at membranous vocal fold (MVF), arytenoid mound (AM) and pyriform sinus (PS) was assessed using a 4-point ordinal scale: none (0) to severe (3). Laryngeal oedema in Group 1 was compared with that of 19 patients who had AA with CT joint separation (Group 2). Maximum phonation time (MPT), jitter and voice handicap index-10 (VHI-10) were measured before surgery and one year postoperatively. Vocal function in Group 1 was compared with 58 patients who underwent AA + NMP flap transfer with CT joint separation (Group 3). The degree of oedema from postoperative days 1 to 6 in Group 1 was relatively invariable: 1.2~1.6 at MVF, 1.3~1.7 at AM, and 1.4~1.7 at PS. The scores at 3 and 4 days postoperatively at MVF and PS in Group 1 were significantly lower than in Group 2 (P = 0.0032 and 0.0317 at day 3, and 0.0224 and 0.0182, at day 4, respectively). The degree of oedema at day 3 at AM in Group 1 was significantly less than in Group 2 (P = 0.0260). One year after surgery, there were no significant differences in MPT, jitter and VHI-10 between Groups 1 and 3 (P = 0.660, 0.111 and 0.556, respectively). Preservation of the CT joint might be beneficial in reducing the maximum degree of laryngeal oedema after AA. Vocal function after AA + NMP flap transfer with CT joint preservation is comparable to that after AA + NMP flap transfer with CT joint separation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7256903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Pacini Editore Srl
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72569032020-06-08 Modified Isshiki’s arytenoid adduction without separating cricothyroid and cricoarytenoid joints Yumoto, Eiji Sanuki, Tetsuji Kumai, Yoshihiko Kodama, Narihiro Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Laryngology Modified methods of arytenoid adduction (AA) have been reported to keep the cricothyroid (CT) joint intact. However, postoperative laryngeal oedema and long-term vocal function have not been compared with those after AA with CT joint separation. We refined AA to combine it with nerve-muscle pedicle (NMP) flap transfer for preservation of the CT joint. Eight patients with unilateral laryngeal paralysis underwent the procedure (Group 1). Postoperative oedema at membranous vocal fold (MVF), arytenoid mound (AM) and pyriform sinus (PS) was assessed using a 4-point ordinal scale: none (0) to severe (3). Laryngeal oedema in Group 1 was compared with that of 19 patients who had AA with CT joint separation (Group 2). Maximum phonation time (MPT), jitter and voice handicap index-10 (VHI-10) were measured before surgery and one year postoperatively. Vocal function in Group 1 was compared with 58 patients who underwent AA + NMP flap transfer with CT joint separation (Group 3). The degree of oedema from postoperative days 1 to 6 in Group 1 was relatively invariable: 1.2~1.6 at MVF, 1.3~1.7 at AM, and 1.4~1.7 at PS. The scores at 3 and 4 days postoperatively at MVF and PS in Group 1 were significantly lower than in Group 2 (P = 0.0032 and 0.0317 at day 3, and 0.0224 and 0.0182, at day 4, respectively). The degree of oedema at day 3 at AM in Group 1 was significantly less than in Group 2 (P = 0.0260). One year after surgery, there were no significant differences in MPT, jitter and VHI-10 between Groups 1 and 3 (P = 0.660, 0.111 and 0.556, respectively). Preservation of the CT joint might be beneficial in reducing the maximum degree of laryngeal oedema after AA. Vocal function after AA + NMP flap transfer with CT joint preservation is comparable to that after AA + NMP flap transfer with CT joint separation. Pacini Editore Srl 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7256903/ /pubmed/32469003 http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N0183 Text en Società Italiana di Otorinolaringoiatria e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale, Rome, Italy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the CC-BY-NC-ND (Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International) license. The article can be used by giving appropriate credit and mentioning the license, but only for non-commercial purposes and only in the original version. For further information: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en
spellingShingle Laryngology
Yumoto, Eiji
Sanuki, Tetsuji
Kumai, Yoshihiko
Kodama, Narihiro
Modified Isshiki’s arytenoid adduction without separating cricothyroid and cricoarytenoid joints
title Modified Isshiki’s arytenoid adduction without separating cricothyroid and cricoarytenoid joints
title_full Modified Isshiki’s arytenoid adduction without separating cricothyroid and cricoarytenoid joints
title_fullStr Modified Isshiki’s arytenoid adduction without separating cricothyroid and cricoarytenoid joints
title_full_unstemmed Modified Isshiki’s arytenoid adduction without separating cricothyroid and cricoarytenoid joints
title_short Modified Isshiki’s arytenoid adduction without separating cricothyroid and cricoarytenoid joints
title_sort modified isshiki’s arytenoid adduction without separating cricothyroid and cricoarytenoid joints
topic Laryngology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7256903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32469003
http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N0183
work_keys_str_mv AT yumotoeiji modifiedisshikisarytenoidadductionwithoutseparatingcricothyroidandcricoarytenoidjoints
AT sanukitetsuji modifiedisshikisarytenoidadductionwithoutseparatingcricothyroidandcricoarytenoidjoints
AT kumaiyoshihiko modifiedisshikisarytenoidadductionwithoutseparatingcricothyroidandcricoarytenoidjoints
AT kodamanarihiro modifiedisshikisarytenoidadductionwithoutseparatingcricothyroidandcricoarytenoidjoints