Cargando…
Frequency Following Response and Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid
Multiple studies have shown significant speech recognition benefit when acoustic hearing is combined with a cochlear implant (CI) for a bimodal hearing configuration. However, this benefit varies greatly between individuals. There are few clinical measures correlated with bimodal benefit and those c...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7257083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32003296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216520902001 |
_version_ | 1783540027369717760 |
---|---|
author | Kessler, David M. Ananthakrishnan, Saradha Smith, Spencer B. D’Onofrio, Kristen Gifford, René H. |
author_facet | Kessler, David M. Ananthakrishnan, Saradha Smith, Spencer B. D’Onofrio, Kristen Gifford, René H. |
author_sort | Kessler, David M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multiple studies have shown significant speech recognition benefit when acoustic hearing is combined with a cochlear implant (CI) for a bimodal hearing configuration. However, this benefit varies greatly between individuals. There are few clinical measures correlated with bimodal benefit and those correlations are driven by extreme values prohibiting data-driven, clinical counseling. This study evaluated the relationship between neural representation of fundamental frequency (F0) and temporal fine structure via the frequency following response (FFR) in the nonimplanted ear as well as spectral and temporal resolution of the nonimplanted ear and bimodal benefit for speech recognition in quiet and noise. Participants included 14 unilateral CI users who wore a hearing aid (HA) in the nonimplanted ear. Testing included speech recognition in quiet and in noise with the HA-alone, CI-alone, and in the bimodal condition (i.e., CI + HA), measures of spectral and temporal resolution in the nonimplanted ear, and FFR recording for a 170-ms/da/stimulus in the nonimplanted ear. Even after controlling for four-frequency pure-tone average, there was a significant correlation (r = .83) between FFR F0 amplitude in the nonimplanted ear and bimodal benefit. Other measures of auditory function of the nonimplanted ear were not significantly correlated with bimodal benefit. The FFR holds potential as an objective tool that may allow data-driven counseling regarding expected benefit from the nonimplanted ear. It is possible that this information may eventually be used for clinical decision-making, particularly in difficult-to-test populations such as young children, regarding effectiveness of bimodal hearing versus bilateral CI candidacy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7257083 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72570832020-06-09 Frequency Following Response and Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid Kessler, David M. Ananthakrishnan, Saradha Smith, Spencer B. D’Onofrio, Kristen Gifford, René H. Trends Hear Original Article Multiple studies have shown significant speech recognition benefit when acoustic hearing is combined with a cochlear implant (CI) for a bimodal hearing configuration. However, this benefit varies greatly between individuals. There are few clinical measures correlated with bimodal benefit and those correlations are driven by extreme values prohibiting data-driven, clinical counseling. This study evaluated the relationship between neural representation of fundamental frequency (F0) and temporal fine structure via the frequency following response (FFR) in the nonimplanted ear as well as spectral and temporal resolution of the nonimplanted ear and bimodal benefit for speech recognition in quiet and noise. Participants included 14 unilateral CI users who wore a hearing aid (HA) in the nonimplanted ear. Testing included speech recognition in quiet and in noise with the HA-alone, CI-alone, and in the bimodal condition (i.e., CI + HA), measures of spectral and temporal resolution in the nonimplanted ear, and FFR recording for a 170-ms/da/stimulus in the nonimplanted ear. Even after controlling for four-frequency pure-tone average, there was a significant correlation (r = .83) between FFR F0 amplitude in the nonimplanted ear and bimodal benefit. Other measures of auditory function of the nonimplanted ear were not significantly correlated with bimodal benefit. The FFR holds potential as an objective tool that may allow data-driven counseling regarding expected benefit from the nonimplanted ear. It is possible that this information may eventually be used for clinical decision-making, particularly in difficult-to-test populations such as young children, regarding effectiveness of bimodal hearing versus bilateral CI candidacy. SAGE Publications 2020-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7257083/ /pubmed/32003296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216520902001 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons CC BY: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kessler, David M. Ananthakrishnan, Saradha Smith, Spencer B. D’Onofrio, Kristen Gifford, René H. Frequency Following Response and Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid |
title | Frequency Following Response and Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid |
title_full | Frequency Following Response and Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid |
title_fullStr | Frequency Following Response and Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid |
title_full_unstemmed | Frequency Following Response and Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid |
title_short | Frequency Following Response and Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid |
title_sort | frequency following response and speech recognition benefit for combining a cochlear implant and contralateral hearing aid |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7257083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32003296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216520902001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kesslerdavidm frequencyfollowingresponseandspeechrecognitionbenefitforcombiningacochlearimplantandcontralateralhearingaid AT ananthakrishnansaradha frequencyfollowingresponseandspeechrecognitionbenefitforcombiningacochlearimplantandcontralateralhearingaid AT smithspencerb frequencyfollowingresponseandspeechrecognitionbenefitforcombiningacochlearimplantandcontralateralhearingaid AT donofriokristen frequencyfollowingresponseandspeechrecognitionbenefitforcombiningacochlearimplantandcontralateralhearingaid AT giffordreneh frequencyfollowingresponseandspeechrecognitionbenefitforcombiningacochlearimplantandcontralateralhearingaid |