Cargando…

Frequency Following Response and Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid

Multiple studies have shown significant speech recognition benefit when acoustic hearing is combined with a cochlear implant (CI) for a bimodal hearing configuration. However, this benefit varies greatly between individuals. There are few clinical measures correlated with bimodal benefit and those c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kessler, David M., Ananthakrishnan, Saradha, Smith, Spencer B., D’Onofrio, Kristen, Gifford, René H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7257083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32003296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216520902001
_version_ 1783540027369717760
author Kessler, David M.
Ananthakrishnan, Saradha
Smith, Spencer B.
D’Onofrio, Kristen
Gifford, René H.
author_facet Kessler, David M.
Ananthakrishnan, Saradha
Smith, Spencer B.
D’Onofrio, Kristen
Gifford, René H.
author_sort Kessler, David M.
collection PubMed
description Multiple studies have shown significant speech recognition benefit when acoustic hearing is combined with a cochlear implant (CI) for a bimodal hearing configuration. However, this benefit varies greatly between individuals. There are few clinical measures correlated with bimodal benefit and those correlations are driven by extreme values prohibiting data-driven, clinical counseling. This study evaluated the relationship between neural representation of fundamental frequency (F0) and temporal fine structure via the frequency following response (FFR) in the nonimplanted ear as well as spectral and temporal resolution of the nonimplanted ear and bimodal benefit for speech recognition in quiet and noise. Participants included 14 unilateral CI users who wore a hearing aid (HA) in the nonimplanted ear. Testing included speech recognition in quiet and in noise with the HA-alone, CI-alone, and in the bimodal condition (i.e., CI + HA), measures of spectral and temporal resolution in the nonimplanted ear, and FFR recording for a 170-ms/da/stimulus in the nonimplanted ear. Even after controlling for four-frequency pure-tone average, there was a significant correlation (r = .83) between FFR F0 amplitude in the nonimplanted ear and bimodal benefit. Other measures of auditory function of the nonimplanted ear were not significantly correlated with bimodal benefit. The FFR holds potential as an objective tool that may allow data-driven counseling regarding expected benefit from the nonimplanted ear. It is possible that this information may eventually be used for clinical decision-making, particularly in difficult-to-test populations such as young children, regarding effectiveness of bimodal hearing versus bilateral CI candidacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7257083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72570832020-06-09 Frequency Following Response and Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid Kessler, David M. Ananthakrishnan, Saradha Smith, Spencer B. D’Onofrio, Kristen Gifford, René H. Trends Hear Original Article Multiple studies have shown significant speech recognition benefit when acoustic hearing is combined with a cochlear implant (CI) for a bimodal hearing configuration. However, this benefit varies greatly between individuals. There are few clinical measures correlated with bimodal benefit and those correlations are driven by extreme values prohibiting data-driven, clinical counseling. This study evaluated the relationship between neural representation of fundamental frequency (F0) and temporal fine structure via the frequency following response (FFR) in the nonimplanted ear as well as spectral and temporal resolution of the nonimplanted ear and bimodal benefit for speech recognition in quiet and noise. Participants included 14 unilateral CI users who wore a hearing aid (HA) in the nonimplanted ear. Testing included speech recognition in quiet and in noise with the HA-alone, CI-alone, and in the bimodal condition (i.e., CI + HA), measures of spectral and temporal resolution in the nonimplanted ear, and FFR recording for a 170-ms/da/stimulus in the nonimplanted ear. Even after controlling for four-frequency pure-tone average, there was a significant correlation (r = .83) between FFR F0 amplitude in the nonimplanted ear and bimodal benefit. Other measures of auditory function of the nonimplanted ear were not significantly correlated with bimodal benefit. The FFR holds potential as an objective tool that may allow data-driven counseling regarding expected benefit from the nonimplanted ear. It is possible that this information may eventually be used for clinical decision-making, particularly in difficult-to-test populations such as young children, regarding effectiveness of bimodal hearing versus bilateral CI candidacy. SAGE Publications 2020-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7257083/ /pubmed/32003296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216520902001 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons CC BY: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Kessler, David M.
Ananthakrishnan, Saradha
Smith, Spencer B.
D’Onofrio, Kristen
Gifford, René H.
Frequency Following Response and Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid
title Frequency Following Response and Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid
title_full Frequency Following Response and Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid
title_fullStr Frequency Following Response and Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid
title_full_unstemmed Frequency Following Response and Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid
title_short Frequency Following Response and Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid
title_sort frequency following response and speech recognition benefit for combining a cochlear implant and contralateral hearing aid
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7257083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32003296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216520902001
work_keys_str_mv AT kesslerdavidm frequencyfollowingresponseandspeechrecognitionbenefitforcombiningacochlearimplantandcontralateralhearingaid
AT ananthakrishnansaradha frequencyfollowingresponseandspeechrecognitionbenefitforcombiningacochlearimplantandcontralateralhearingaid
AT smithspencerb frequencyfollowingresponseandspeechrecognitionbenefitforcombiningacochlearimplantandcontralateralhearingaid
AT donofriokristen frequencyfollowingresponseandspeechrecognitionbenefitforcombiningacochlearimplantandcontralateralhearingaid
AT giffordreneh frequencyfollowingresponseandspeechrecognitionbenefitforcombiningacochlearimplantandcontralateralhearingaid