Cargando…

Protocol for the process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of independent pharmacist prescribing in care home: the CHIPPS study

BACKGROUND: Prescribing, monitoring and administration of medicines in care homes could be improved. A cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) is ongoing to evaluate the effectiveness of an independent prescribing pharmacist assuming responsibility for medicines management in care homes compared t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bond, Christine M., Holland, Richard, Alldred, David P., Arthur, Antony, Barton, Garry, Birt, Linda, Blyth, Annie, Desborough, James, Ford, Joanna, Handford, Christine, Hill, Helen, Hughes, Carmel M., Maskrey, Vivienne, Massey, Kate, Myint, Phyo K., Norris, Nigel, Poland, Fiona M., Shepstone, Lee, Zermansky, Arnold, Wright, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7257128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32471514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04264-8
_version_ 1783540029563338752
author Bond, Christine M.
Holland, Richard
Alldred, David P.
Arthur, Antony
Barton, Garry
Birt, Linda
Blyth, Annie
Desborough, James
Ford, Joanna
Handford, Christine
Hill, Helen
Hughes, Carmel M.
Maskrey, Vivienne
Massey, Kate
Myint, Phyo K.
Norris, Nigel
Poland, Fiona M.
Shepstone, Lee
Zermansky, Arnold
Wright, David
author_facet Bond, Christine M.
Holland, Richard
Alldred, David P.
Arthur, Antony
Barton, Garry
Birt, Linda
Blyth, Annie
Desborough, James
Ford, Joanna
Handford, Christine
Hill, Helen
Hughes, Carmel M.
Maskrey, Vivienne
Massey, Kate
Myint, Phyo K.
Norris, Nigel
Poland, Fiona M.
Shepstone, Lee
Zermansky, Arnold
Wright, David
author_sort Bond, Christine M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prescribing, monitoring and administration of medicines in care homes could be improved. A cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) is ongoing to evaluate the effectiveness of an independent prescribing pharmacist assuming responsibility for medicines management in care homes compared to usual care. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To conduct a mixed-methods process evaluation of the RCT, in line with Medical Research Council (MRC) process evaluation guidance, to inform interpretation of main trial findings and if the service is found to be effective and efficient, to inform subsequent implementation. OBJECTIVES: 1. To describe the intervention as delivered in terms of quality, quantity, adaptations and variations across triads and time. 2. To explore the effects of individual intervention components on the primary outcomes. 3. To investigate the mechanisms of impact. 4. To describe the perceived effectiveness of relevant intervention components [including pharmacist independent prescriber (PIP) training and care home staff training] from participant [general practitioner (GP), care home, PIP and resident/relative] perspectives. 5. To describe the characteristics of GP, care home, PIP and resident participants to assess reach. 6. To estimate the extent to which intervention delivery is normalised among the intervention healthcare professionals and related practice staff. METHODS: A mix of quantitative (surveys, record reviews) and qualitative (interviews) approaches will be used to collect data on the extent of the delivery of detailed tasks required to implement the new service, to collect data to confirm the mechanism of impact as hypothesised in the logic model, to collect explanatory process and final outcome data, and data on contextual factors which could have facilitated or hindered effective and efficient delivery of the service. DISCUSSION: Recruitment is ongoing and the trial should complete in early 2020. The systematic and comprehensive approach that is being adopted will ensure data is captured on all aspects of the study, and allow a full understanding of the implementation of the service and the RCT findings. With so many interrelated factors involved it is important that a process evaluation is undertaken to enable us to identify which elements of the service were deemed to be effective, explain any differences seen, and identify enablers, barriers and future adaptions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN17847169. Date registered: 15 December 2017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7257128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72571282020-06-07 Protocol for the process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of independent pharmacist prescribing in care home: the CHIPPS study Bond, Christine M. Holland, Richard Alldred, David P. Arthur, Antony Barton, Garry Birt, Linda Blyth, Annie Desborough, James Ford, Joanna Handford, Christine Hill, Helen Hughes, Carmel M. Maskrey, Vivienne Massey, Kate Myint, Phyo K. Norris, Nigel Poland, Fiona M. Shepstone, Lee Zermansky, Arnold Wright, David Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Prescribing, monitoring and administration of medicines in care homes could be improved. A cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) is ongoing to evaluate the effectiveness of an independent prescribing pharmacist assuming responsibility for medicines management in care homes compared to usual care. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To conduct a mixed-methods process evaluation of the RCT, in line with Medical Research Council (MRC) process evaluation guidance, to inform interpretation of main trial findings and if the service is found to be effective and efficient, to inform subsequent implementation. OBJECTIVES: 1. To describe the intervention as delivered in terms of quality, quantity, adaptations and variations across triads and time. 2. To explore the effects of individual intervention components on the primary outcomes. 3. To investigate the mechanisms of impact. 4. To describe the perceived effectiveness of relevant intervention components [including pharmacist independent prescriber (PIP) training and care home staff training] from participant [general practitioner (GP), care home, PIP and resident/relative] perspectives. 5. To describe the characteristics of GP, care home, PIP and resident participants to assess reach. 6. To estimate the extent to which intervention delivery is normalised among the intervention healthcare professionals and related practice staff. METHODS: A mix of quantitative (surveys, record reviews) and qualitative (interviews) approaches will be used to collect data on the extent of the delivery of detailed tasks required to implement the new service, to collect data to confirm the mechanism of impact as hypothesised in the logic model, to collect explanatory process and final outcome data, and data on contextual factors which could have facilitated or hindered effective and efficient delivery of the service. DISCUSSION: Recruitment is ongoing and the trial should complete in early 2020. The systematic and comprehensive approach that is being adopted will ensure data is captured on all aspects of the study, and allow a full understanding of the implementation of the service and the RCT findings. With so many interrelated factors involved it is important that a process evaluation is undertaken to enable us to identify which elements of the service were deemed to be effective, explain any differences seen, and identify enablers, barriers and future adaptions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN17847169. Date registered: 15 December 2017. BioMed Central 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7257128/ /pubmed/32471514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04264-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Bond, Christine M.
Holland, Richard
Alldred, David P.
Arthur, Antony
Barton, Garry
Birt, Linda
Blyth, Annie
Desborough, James
Ford, Joanna
Handford, Christine
Hill, Helen
Hughes, Carmel M.
Maskrey, Vivienne
Massey, Kate
Myint, Phyo K.
Norris, Nigel
Poland, Fiona M.
Shepstone, Lee
Zermansky, Arnold
Wright, David
Protocol for the process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of independent pharmacist prescribing in care home: the CHIPPS study
title Protocol for the process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of independent pharmacist prescribing in care home: the CHIPPS study
title_full Protocol for the process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of independent pharmacist prescribing in care home: the CHIPPS study
title_fullStr Protocol for the process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of independent pharmacist prescribing in care home: the CHIPPS study
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for the process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of independent pharmacist prescribing in care home: the CHIPPS study
title_short Protocol for the process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of independent pharmacist prescribing in care home: the CHIPPS study
title_sort protocol for the process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of independent pharmacist prescribing in care home: the chipps study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7257128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32471514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04264-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bondchristinem protocolfortheprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtodeterminetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofindependentpharmacistprescribingincarehomethechippsstudy
AT hollandrichard protocolfortheprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtodeterminetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofindependentpharmacistprescribingincarehomethechippsstudy
AT alldreddavidp protocolfortheprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtodeterminetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofindependentpharmacistprescribingincarehomethechippsstudy
AT arthurantony protocolfortheprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtodeterminetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofindependentpharmacistprescribingincarehomethechippsstudy
AT bartongarry protocolfortheprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtodeterminetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofindependentpharmacistprescribingincarehomethechippsstudy
AT birtlinda protocolfortheprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtodeterminetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofindependentpharmacistprescribingincarehomethechippsstudy
AT blythannie protocolfortheprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtodeterminetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofindependentpharmacistprescribingincarehomethechippsstudy
AT desboroughjames protocolfortheprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtodeterminetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofindependentpharmacistprescribingincarehomethechippsstudy
AT fordjoanna protocolfortheprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtodeterminetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofindependentpharmacistprescribingincarehomethechippsstudy
AT handfordchristine protocolfortheprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtodeterminetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofindependentpharmacistprescribingincarehomethechippsstudy
AT hillhelen protocolfortheprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtodeterminetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofindependentpharmacistprescribingincarehomethechippsstudy
AT hughescarmelm protocolfortheprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtodeterminetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofindependentpharmacistprescribingincarehomethechippsstudy
AT maskreyvivienne protocolfortheprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtodeterminetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofindependentpharmacistprescribingincarehomethechippsstudy
AT masseykate protocolfortheprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtodeterminetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofindependentpharmacistprescribingincarehomethechippsstudy
AT myintphyok protocolfortheprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtodeterminetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofindependentpharmacistprescribingincarehomethechippsstudy
AT norrisnigel protocolfortheprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtodeterminetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofindependentpharmacistprescribingincarehomethechippsstudy
AT polandfionam protocolfortheprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtodeterminetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofindependentpharmacistprescribingincarehomethechippsstudy
AT shepstonelee protocolfortheprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtodeterminetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofindependentpharmacistprescribingincarehomethechippsstudy
AT zermanskyarnold protocolfortheprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtodeterminetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofindependentpharmacistprescribingincarehomethechippsstudy
AT wrightdavid protocolfortheprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtodeterminetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofindependentpharmacistprescribingincarehomethechippsstudy
AT protocolfortheprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtodeterminetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofindependentpharmacistprescribingincarehomethechippsstudy