Cargando…
Evidence of unexplained discrepancies between planned and conducted statistical analyses: a review of randomised trials
BACKGROUND: Choosing or altering the planned statistical analysis approach after examination of trial data (often referred to as ‘p-hacking’) can bias the results of randomised trials. However, the extent of this issue in practice is currently unclear. We conducted a review of published randomised t...
Autores principales: | Cro, Suzie, Forbes, Gordon, Johnson, Nicholas A., Kahan, Brennan C. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7257229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32466758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01590-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Access to unpublished protocols and statistical analysis plans of randomised trials
por: Campbell, David, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
How to design a pre-specified statistical analysis approach to limit p-hacking in clinical trials: the Pre-SPEC framework
por: Kahan, Brennan C., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Risk of selection bias in randomised trials
por: Kahan, Brennan C., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Estimands in published protocols of randomised trials: urgent improvement needed
por: Kahan, Brennan C., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Blinded Outcome Assessment Was Infrequently Used and Poorly Reported in Open Trials
por: Kahan, Brennan C., et al.
Publicado: (2015)