Cargando…

Self-evaluated ethical competence of a practicing physiotherapist: a national study in Finland

BACKGROUND: Patients have the right to equal, respectful treatment. Nowadays, one third of patient complaints concern health care staff’s behavior towards patients. Ethically safe care requires ethical competence, which has been addressed as a core competence in physiotherapy. It has been defined in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: KULJU, Kati, SUHONEN, Riitta, PUUKKA, Pauli, TOLVANEN, Anna, LEINO-KILPI, Helena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7257238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32471504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00469-3
_version_ 1783540054027665408
author KULJU, Kati
SUHONEN, Riitta
PUUKKA, Pauli
TOLVANEN, Anna
LEINO-KILPI, Helena
author_facet KULJU, Kati
SUHONEN, Riitta
PUUKKA, Pauli
TOLVANEN, Anna
LEINO-KILPI, Helena
author_sort KULJU, Kati
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients have the right to equal, respectful treatment. Nowadays, one third of patient complaints concern health care staff’s behavior towards patients. Ethically safe care requires ethical competence, which has been addressed as a core competence in physiotherapy. It has been defined in terms of character strength, ethical awareness, moral judgment skills in decision-making, and willingness to do good. The purpose of this study was to analyze the ethical competence of practicing physiotherapists. METHOD: A self-evaluation instrument (Physiotherapist’s Ethical Competence Evaluation Tool) based on an analysis of a concept “ethical competence” was constructed in 2016 and physiotherapists (n = 839), working in public health services or private practice responded to the questionnaire. RESULTS: Based on the results, most of the physiotherapists evaluated themselves highly ethically competent in all areas of ethical competence, subscales being Strength, Awareness, Skills and Will. Willingness to do good was evaluated as highest, while character strength, including the strength to support ethical processes and speak on behalf of the patient, was evaluated the lowest. Physiotherapists most commonly consult a colleague when encountering an ethical problem. Other methods for problem solving are not very familiar, neither are the international or national ethical codes of conduct. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first attempt to assess all aspects of ethical competence empirically in a clinical environment in physiotherapy, using a novel self-evaluation instrument. Even if physiotherapists evaluate themselves as competent in ethics, further exploration is needed for ethical awareness. Also the patients’ viewpoints about ethically competent care should be considered, to better ensure ethical safety of the patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7257238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72572382020-06-07 Self-evaluated ethical competence of a practicing physiotherapist: a national study in Finland KULJU, Kati SUHONEN, Riitta PUUKKA, Pauli TOLVANEN, Anna LEINO-KILPI, Helena BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients have the right to equal, respectful treatment. Nowadays, one third of patient complaints concern health care staff’s behavior towards patients. Ethically safe care requires ethical competence, which has been addressed as a core competence in physiotherapy. It has been defined in terms of character strength, ethical awareness, moral judgment skills in decision-making, and willingness to do good. The purpose of this study was to analyze the ethical competence of practicing physiotherapists. METHOD: A self-evaluation instrument (Physiotherapist’s Ethical Competence Evaluation Tool) based on an analysis of a concept “ethical competence” was constructed in 2016 and physiotherapists (n = 839), working in public health services or private practice responded to the questionnaire. RESULTS: Based on the results, most of the physiotherapists evaluated themselves highly ethically competent in all areas of ethical competence, subscales being Strength, Awareness, Skills and Will. Willingness to do good was evaluated as highest, while character strength, including the strength to support ethical processes and speak on behalf of the patient, was evaluated the lowest. Physiotherapists most commonly consult a colleague when encountering an ethical problem. Other methods for problem solving are not very familiar, neither are the international or national ethical codes of conduct. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first attempt to assess all aspects of ethical competence empirically in a clinical environment in physiotherapy, using a novel self-evaluation instrument. Even if physiotherapists evaluate themselves as competent in ethics, further exploration is needed for ethical awareness. Also the patients’ viewpoints about ethically competent care should be considered, to better ensure ethical safety of the patient. BioMed Central 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7257238/ /pubmed/32471504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00469-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
KULJU, Kati
SUHONEN, Riitta
PUUKKA, Pauli
TOLVANEN, Anna
LEINO-KILPI, Helena
Self-evaluated ethical competence of a practicing physiotherapist: a national study in Finland
title Self-evaluated ethical competence of a practicing physiotherapist: a national study in Finland
title_full Self-evaluated ethical competence of a practicing physiotherapist: a national study in Finland
title_fullStr Self-evaluated ethical competence of a practicing physiotherapist: a national study in Finland
title_full_unstemmed Self-evaluated ethical competence of a practicing physiotherapist: a national study in Finland
title_short Self-evaluated ethical competence of a practicing physiotherapist: a national study in Finland
title_sort self-evaluated ethical competence of a practicing physiotherapist: a national study in finland
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7257238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32471504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00469-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kuljukati selfevaluatedethicalcompetenceofapracticingphysiotherapistanationalstudyinfinland
AT suhonenriitta selfevaluatedethicalcompetenceofapracticingphysiotherapistanationalstudyinfinland
AT puukkapauli selfevaluatedethicalcompetenceofapracticingphysiotherapistanationalstudyinfinland
AT tolvanenanna selfevaluatedethicalcompetenceofapracticingphysiotherapistanationalstudyinfinland
AT leinokilpihelena selfevaluatedethicalcompetenceofapracticingphysiotherapistanationalstudyinfinland