Cargando…
Diagnostic Value of Combinatorial Markers in Colorectal Carcinoma
Objectives: Blood-based tests have been shown to be an effective strategy for colorectal cancer (CRC) detection in screening programs. This study was aimed to test the performance of 20 blood markers including tumor antigens, inflammatory markers, and apolipoproteins as well as their combinations. M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7258084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32528895 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00832 |
_version_ | 1783540075740528640 |
---|---|
author | Voronova, Veronika Glybochko, Peter Svistunov, Andrey Fomin, Viktor Kopylov, Philipp Tzarkov, Peter Egorov, Alexey Gitel, Evgenij Ragimov, Aligeydar Boroda, Alexander Poddubskaya, Elena Sekacheva, Marina |
author_facet | Voronova, Veronika Glybochko, Peter Svistunov, Andrey Fomin, Viktor Kopylov, Philipp Tzarkov, Peter Egorov, Alexey Gitel, Evgenij Ragimov, Aligeydar Boroda, Alexander Poddubskaya, Elena Sekacheva, Marina |
author_sort | Voronova, Veronika |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives: Blood-based tests have been shown to be an effective strategy for colorectal cancer (CRC) detection in screening programs. This study was aimed to test the performance of 20 blood markers including tumor antigens, inflammatory markers, and apolipoproteins as well as their combinations. Methods: In total 203 healthy volunteers and 102 patients with CRC were enrolled into the study. Differences between healthy and cancer subjects were evaluated using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Several multivariate classification algorithms were employed using information about different combinations of biomarkers altered in CRC patients as well as age and gender of the subjects; random sub-sampling cross-validation was done to overcome overfitting problem. Diagnostic performance of single biomarkers and multivariate classification models was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Of 20 biomarkers, 16 were significantly different between the groups (p-value ≤ 0.001); ApoA1, ApoA2 and ApoA4 levels were decreased, whereas levels of tumor antigens (e.g. carcinoembriogenic antigen) and inflammatory markers (e.g., C-reactive protein) were increased in CRC patients vs. healthy subjects. Combinatorial markers including information about all 16 significant analytes, age and gender of patients, demonstrated better performance over single biomarkers with average accuracy on test datasets ≥95% and area under ROC curve (AUROC) ≥98%. Conclusions: Combinatorial approach was shown to be a valid strategy to improve performance of blood-based CRC diagnostics. Further evaluation of the proposed models in screening programs will be performed to gain a better understanding of their diagnostic value. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7258084 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72580842020-06-10 Diagnostic Value of Combinatorial Markers in Colorectal Carcinoma Voronova, Veronika Glybochko, Peter Svistunov, Andrey Fomin, Viktor Kopylov, Philipp Tzarkov, Peter Egorov, Alexey Gitel, Evgenij Ragimov, Aligeydar Boroda, Alexander Poddubskaya, Elena Sekacheva, Marina Front Oncol Oncology Objectives: Blood-based tests have been shown to be an effective strategy for colorectal cancer (CRC) detection in screening programs. This study was aimed to test the performance of 20 blood markers including tumor antigens, inflammatory markers, and apolipoproteins as well as their combinations. Methods: In total 203 healthy volunteers and 102 patients with CRC were enrolled into the study. Differences between healthy and cancer subjects were evaluated using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Several multivariate classification algorithms were employed using information about different combinations of biomarkers altered in CRC patients as well as age and gender of the subjects; random sub-sampling cross-validation was done to overcome overfitting problem. Diagnostic performance of single biomarkers and multivariate classification models was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Of 20 biomarkers, 16 were significantly different between the groups (p-value ≤ 0.001); ApoA1, ApoA2 and ApoA4 levels were decreased, whereas levels of tumor antigens (e.g. carcinoembriogenic antigen) and inflammatory markers (e.g., C-reactive protein) were increased in CRC patients vs. healthy subjects. Combinatorial markers including information about all 16 significant analytes, age and gender of patients, demonstrated better performance over single biomarkers with average accuracy on test datasets ≥95% and area under ROC curve (AUROC) ≥98%. Conclusions: Combinatorial approach was shown to be a valid strategy to improve performance of blood-based CRC diagnostics. Further evaluation of the proposed models in screening programs will be performed to gain a better understanding of their diagnostic value. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7258084/ /pubmed/32528895 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00832 Text en Copyright © 2020 Voronova, Glybochko, Svistunov, Fomin, Kopylov, Tzarkov, Egorov, Gitel, Ragimov, Boroda, Poddubskaya and Sekacheva. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Voronova, Veronika Glybochko, Peter Svistunov, Andrey Fomin, Viktor Kopylov, Philipp Tzarkov, Peter Egorov, Alexey Gitel, Evgenij Ragimov, Aligeydar Boroda, Alexander Poddubskaya, Elena Sekacheva, Marina Diagnostic Value of Combinatorial Markers in Colorectal Carcinoma |
title | Diagnostic Value of Combinatorial Markers in Colorectal Carcinoma |
title_full | Diagnostic Value of Combinatorial Markers in Colorectal Carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Value of Combinatorial Markers in Colorectal Carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Value of Combinatorial Markers in Colorectal Carcinoma |
title_short | Diagnostic Value of Combinatorial Markers in Colorectal Carcinoma |
title_sort | diagnostic value of combinatorial markers in colorectal carcinoma |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7258084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32528895 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00832 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT voronovaveronika diagnosticvalueofcombinatorialmarkersincolorectalcarcinoma AT glybochkopeter diagnosticvalueofcombinatorialmarkersincolorectalcarcinoma AT svistunovandrey diagnosticvalueofcombinatorialmarkersincolorectalcarcinoma AT fominviktor diagnosticvalueofcombinatorialmarkersincolorectalcarcinoma AT kopylovphilipp diagnosticvalueofcombinatorialmarkersincolorectalcarcinoma AT tzarkovpeter diagnosticvalueofcombinatorialmarkersincolorectalcarcinoma AT egorovalexey diagnosticvalueofcombinatorialmarkersincolorectalcarcinoma AT gitelevgenij diagnosticvalueofcombinatorialmarkersincolorectalcarcinoma AT ragimovaligeydar diagnosticvalueofcombinatorialmarkersincolorectalcarcinoma AT borodaalexander diagnosticvalueofcombinatorialmarkersincolorectalcarcinoma AT poddubskayaelena diagnosticvalueofcombinatorialmarkersincolorectalcarcinoma AT sekachevamarina diagnosticvalueofcombinatorialmarkersincolorectalcarcinoma |