Cargando…

Diagnostic Value of Combinatorial Markers in Colorectal Carcinoma

Objectives: Blood-based tests have been shown to be an effective strategy for colorectal cancer (CRC) detection in screening programs. This study was aimed to test the performance of 20 blood markers including tumor antigens, inflammatory markers, and apolipoproteins as well as their combinations. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Voronova, Veronika, Glybochko, Peter, Svistunov, Andrey, Fomin, Viktor, Kopylov, Philipp, Tzarkov, Peter, Egorov, Alexey, Gitel, Evgenij, Ragimov, Aligeydar, Boroda, Alexander, Poddubskaya, Elena, Sekacheva, Marina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7258084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32528895
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00832
_version_ 1783540075740528640
author Voronova, Veronika
Glybochko, Peter
Svistunov, Andrey
Fomin, Viktor
Kopylov, Philipp
Tzarkov, Peter
Egorov, Alexey
Gitel, Evgenij
Ragimov, Aligeydar
Boroda, Alexander
Poddubskaya, Elena
Sekacheva, Marina
author_facet Voronova, Veronika
Glybochko, Peter
Svistunov, Andrey
Fomin, Viktor
Kopylov, Philipp
Tzarkov, Peter
Egorov, Alexey
Gitel, Evgenij
Ragimov, Aligeydar
Boroda, Alexander
Poddubskaya, Elena
Sekacheva, Marina
author_sort Voronova, Veronika
collection PubMed
description Objectives: Blood-based tests have been shown to be an effective strategy for colorectal cancer (CRC) detection in screening programs. This study was aimed to test the performance of 20 blood markers including tumor antigens, inflammatory markers, and apolipoproteins as well as their combinations. Methods: In total 203 healthy volunteers and 102 patients with CRC were enrolled into the study. Differences between healthy and cancer subjects were evaluated using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Several multivariate classification algorithms were employed using information about different combinations of biomarkers altered in CRC patients as well as age and gender of the subjects; random sub-sampling cross-validation was done to overcome overfitting problem. Diagnostic performance of single biomarkers and multivariate classification models was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Of 20 biomarkers, 16 were significantly different between the groups (p-value ≤ 0.001); ApoA1, ApoA2 and ApoA4 levels were decreased, whereas levels of tumor antigens (e.g. carcinoembriogenic antigen) and inflammatory markers (e.g., C-reactive protein) were increased in CRC patients vs. healthy subjects. Combinatorial markers including information about all 16 significant analytes, age and gender of patients, demonstrated better performance over single biomarkers with average accuracy on test datasets ≥95% and area under ROC curve (AUROC) ≥98%. Conclusions: Combinatorial approach was shown to be a valid strategy to improve performance of blood-based CRC diagnostics. Further evaluation of the proposed models in screening programs will be performed to gain a better understanding of their diagnostic value.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7258084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72580842020-06-10 Diagnostic Value of Combinatorial Markers in Colorectal Carcinoma Voronova, Veronika Glybochko, Peter Svistunov, Andrey Fomin, Viktor Kopylov, Philipp Tzarkov, Peter Egorov, Alexey Gitel, Evgenij Ragimov, Aligeydar Boroda, Alexander Poddubskaya, Elena Sekacheva, Marina Front Oncol Oncology Objectives: Blood-based tests have been shown to be an effective strategy for colorectal cancer (CRC) detection in screening programs. This study was aimed to test the performance of 20 blood markers including tumor antigens, inflammatory markers, and apolipoproteins as well as their combinations. Methods: In total 203 healthy volunteers and 102 patients with CRC were enrolled into the study. Differences between healthy and cancer subjects were evaluated using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Several multivariate classification algorithms were employed using information about different combinations of biomarkers altered in CRC patients as well as age and gender of the subjects; random sub-sampling cross-validation was done to overcome overfitting problem. Diagnostic performance of single biomarkers and multivariate classification models was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Of 20 biomarkers, 16 were significantly different between the groups (p-value ≤ 0.001); ApoA1, ApoA2 and ApoA4 levels were decreased, whereas levels of tumor antigens (e.g. carcinoembriogenic antigen) and inflammatory markers (e.g., C-reactive protein) were increased in CRC patients vs. healthy subjects. Combinatorial markers including information about all 16 significant analytes, age and gender of patients, demonstrated better performance over single biomarkers with average accuracy on test datasets ≥95% and area under ROC curve (AUROC) ≥98%. Conclusions: Combinatorial approach was shown to be a valid strategy to improve performance of blood-based CRC diagnostics. Further evaluation of the proposed models in screening programs will be performed to gain a better understanding of their diagnostic value. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7258084/ /pubmed/32528895 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00832 Text en Copyright © 2020 Voronova, Glybochko, Svistunov, Fomin, Kopylov, Tzarkov, Egorov, Gitel, Ragimov, Boroda, Poddubskaya and Sekacheva. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Voronova, Veronika
Glybochko, Peter
Svistunov, Andrey
Fomin, Viktor
Kopylov, Philipp
Tzarkov, Peter
Egorov, Alexey
Gitel, Evgenij
Ragimov, Aligeydar
Boroda, Alexander
Poddubskaya, Elena
Sekacheva, Marina
Diagnostic Value of Combinatorial Markers in Colorectal Carcinoma
title Diagnostic Value of Combinatorial Markers in Colorectal Carcinoma
title_full Diagnostic Value of Combinatorial Markers in Colorectal Carcinoma
title_fullStr Diagnostic Value of Combinatorial Markers in Colorectal Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Value of Combinatorial Markers in Colorectal Carcinoma
title_short Diagnostic Value of Combinatorial Markers in Colorectal Carcinoma
title_sort diagnostic value of combinatorial markers in colorectal carcinoma
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7258084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32528895
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00832
work_keys_str_mv AT voronovaveronika diagnosticvalueofcombinatorialmarkersincolorectalcarcinoma
AT glybochkopeter diagnosticvalueofcombinatorialmarkersincolorectalcarcinoma
AT svistunovandrey diagnosticvalueofcombinatorialmarkersincolorectalcarcinoma
AT fominviktor diagnosticvalueofcombinatorialmarkersincolorectalcarcinoma
AT kopylovphilipp diagnosticvalueofcombinatorialmarkersincolorectalcarcinoma
AT tzarkovpeter diagnosticvalueofcombinatorialmarkersincolorectalcarcinoma
AT egorovalexey diagnosticvalueofcombinatorialmarkersincolorectalcarcinoma
AT gitelevgenij diagnosticvalueofcombinatorialmarkersincolorectalcarcinoma
AT ragimovaligeydar diagnosticvalueofcombinatorialmarkersincolorectalcarcinoma
AT borodaalexander diagnosticvalueofcombinatorialmarkersincolorectalcarcinoma
AT poddubskayaelena diagnosticvalueofcombinatorialmarkersincolorectalcarcinoma
AT sekachevamarina diagnosticvalueofcombinatorialmarkersincolorectalcarcinoma