Cargando…

Performance of Two Photoscreeners Enhanced by Protective Cases

BACKGROUND: Photoscreeners provide valid, cost-effective early detection of amblyopia risk factors; however, they require proper illumination, flash intensity, pupil dilation and patient cooperation. The Kaleidos case for the 2WIN infrared photoscreener fixes focal distance, decreases luminance and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin, Samuel Joseph, Htoo, Hser Eh, Hser, Nay, Arnold, Robert W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7259487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32546951
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S251451
_version_ 1783540144548085760
author Martin, Samuel Joseph
Htoo, Hser Eh
Hser, Nay
Arnold, Robert W
author_facet Martin, Samuel Joseph
Htoo, Hser Eh
Hser, Nay
Arnold, Robert W
author_sort Martin, Samuel Joseph
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Photoscreeners provide valid, cost-effective early detection of amblyopia risk factors; however, they require proper illumination, flash intensity, pupil dilation and patient cooperation. The Kaleidos case for the 2WIN infrared photoscreener fixes focal distance, decreases luminance and provides electric power. GoCheck Kids (GCK) has developed a flash-concentrating case for the Apple iPhone 7 Plus smartphone to reduce exposure time. METHODS: In remote Burmese and urban Alaskan clinics, Kaleidos and GCK were used before a confirmatory eye examination using 2013 AAPOS uniform guidelines validation, including some older patients. 2WIN refraction was compared to a cycloplegic examination using J0 and J45 vector transformation. RESULTS: In total, 48 Burmese patients and 114 Alaskan patients aged 8±6 years were evaluated utilizing 2013 amblyopia risk factor guidelines. Kaleidos, with 13 Burmese inconclusives, had a sensitivity of 84%, specificity of 65% and positive predictive value (PPV) of 63%. GCK, with only six inconclusives, had a sensitivity of 63%, specificity of 83% and PPV of 73%, with sensitivity improving to 74% with central expert interpretation. Kaleidos closely matched cycloplegic refraction, with intraclass correlations of 0.47 for J0 vector and 0.57 for J45 vector. The protective cases provided clearer images and better pupil dilation than similar devices without cases. CONCLUSION: Both devices detected amblyopia risk factors well. GCK gave fewer inconclusive results even with the Asian eyelid configuration, while Kaleidos matched sphere and cylinder refraction. The specialized housing enhanced the performance of the 2WIN and GCK photoscreeners, improving the speed and reliability of amblyopia screening and refraction, even in populous and luminous locations. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY: NCT04068129.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7259487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72594872020-06-15 Performance of Two Photoscreeners Enhanced by Protective Cases Martin, Samuel Joseph Htoo, Hser Eh Hser, Nay Arnold, Robert W Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: Photoscreeners provide valid, cost-effective early detection of amblyopia risk factors; however, they require proper illumination, flash intensity, pupil dilation and patient cooperation. The Kaleidos case for the 2WIN infrared photoscreener fixes focal distance, decreases luminance and provides electric power. GoCheck Kids (GCK) has developed a flash-concentrating case for the Apple iPhone 7 Plus smartphone to reduce exposure time. METHODS: In remote Burmese and urban Alaskan clinics, Kaleidos and GCK were used before a confirmatory eye examination using 2013 AAPOS uniform guidelines validation, including some older patients. 2WIN refraction was compared to a cycloplegic examination using J0 and J45 vector transformation. RESULTS: In total, 48 Burmese patients and 114 Alaskan patients aged 8±6 years were evaluated utilizing 2013 amblyopia risk factor guidelines. Kaleidos, with 13 Burmese inconclusives, had a sensitivity of 84%, specificity of 65% and positive predictive value (PPV) of 63%. GCK, with only six inconclusives, had a sensitivity of 63%, specificity of 83% and PPV of 73%, with sensitivity improving to 74% with central expert interpretation. Kaleidos closely matched cycloplegic refraction, with intraclass correlations of 0.47 for J0 vector and 0.57 for J45 vector. The protective cases provided clearer images and better pupil dilation than similar devices without cases. CONCLUSION: Both devices detected amblyopia risk factors well. GCK gave fewer inconclusive results even with the Asian eyelid configuration, while Kaleidos matched sphere and cylinder refraction. The specialized housing enhanced the performance of the 2WIN and GCK photoscreeners, improving the speed and reliability of amblyopia screening and refraction, even in populous and luminous locations. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY: NCT04068129. Dove 2020-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7259487/ /pubmed/32546951 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S251451 Text en © 2020 Martin et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Martin, Samuel Joseph
Htoo, Hser Eh
Hser, Nay
Arnold, Robert W
Performance of Two Photoscreeners Enhanced by Protective Cases
title Performance of Two Photoscreeners Enhanced by Protective Cases
title_full Performance of Two Photoscreeners Enhanced by Protective Cases
title_fullStr Performance of Two Photoscreeners Enhanced by Protective Cases
title_full_unstemmed Performance of Two Photoscreeners Enhanced by Protective Cases
title_short Performance of Two Photoscreeners Enhanced by Protective Cases
title_sort performance of two photoscreeners enhanced by protective cases
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7259487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32546951
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S251451
work_keys_str_mv AT martinsamueljoseph performanceoftwophotoscreenersenhancedbyprotectivecases
AT htoohsereh performanceoftwophotoscreenersenhancedbyprotectivecases
AT hsernay performanceoftwophotoscreenersenhancedbyprotectivecases
AT arnoldrobertw performanceoftwophotoscreenersenhancedbyprotectivecases