Cargando…
The 4 youth by youth HIV self-testing crowdsourcing contest: A qualitative evaluation
INTRODUCTION: Crowdsourcing, a participatory approach to solicit ideas from a large group of diverse individuals, provides an opportunity to nurture youth participation in HIV self-testing service design. The objective of this study was to describe the responses to a crowdsourcing contest aimed at s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7259504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32469971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233698 |
_version_ | 1783540148299890688 |
---|---|
author | Iwelunmor, Juliet Ezechi, Oliver Obiezu-Umeh, Chisom Gbaja-Biamila, Titilola Nwaozuru, Ucheoma Oladele, David Musa, Adesola Z. Idigbe, Ifeoma Uzoaru, Florida Airhihenbuwa, Collins Muessig, Kathryn Conserve, Donaldson F. Kapogiannis, Bill Tucker, Joseph D. |
author_facet | Iwelunmor, Juliet Ezechi, Oliver Obiezu-Umeh, Chisom Gbaja-Biamila, Titilola Nwaozuru, Ucheoma Oladele, David Musa, Adesola Z. Idigbe, Ifeoma Uzoaru, Florida Airhihenbuwa, Collins Muessig, Kathryn Conserve, Donaldson F. Kapogiannis, Bill Tucker, Joseph D. |
author_sort | Iwelunmor, Juliet |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Crowdsourcing, a participatory approach to solicit ideas from a large group of diverse individuals, provides an opportunity to nurture youth participation in HIV self-testing service design. The objective of this study was to describe the responses to a crowdsourcing contest aimed at soliciting ideas on how to promote HIV self-testing (HIVST) among young people in Nigeria. METHODS: The “4 Youth by Youth” HIV Self-Testing Crowdsourcing contest was an online and off-line contest that asked Nigerian youth (10–24 years old) for ideas in response to the following: How might we promote HIVST among young people in Nigeria? All data were collected and analyzed between October 2018, and June 2019. Ideas and perceptions generated from the crowdsourcing contest were qualitatively analyzed using thematic content analysis. Specifically, four reviewers analyzed whether the ideas generated were desirable (appealing to young people), feasible (easy to implement) and impactful (will significantly influence HIVST uptake among young people). RESULTS: A total of 903 entries were received in response to the contest prompt. Participants submitted entries in various forms: online form (39.7%), offline Dropbox (44.6%), email (6.1%) and WhatsApp (9.7%). Of the total entries, 85% (n = 769/903) entries were eligible and were scored as having either high, moderate or low level of feasibility, impact and desirability, on a 3-point Likert scale. A significant portion of the entries were given a score of 3 for feasibility (4.9%), desirability (7.1%), impact (3.0%) or a total overall score of 7 or more (8.2%). The three main themes that emerged from the entries include:1) Peer-to-peer distribution and leveraging on existing infrastructures 2) Youth-Oriented Branding of the HIVST Kit 3) Mobile platforms and social media technology. CONCLUSION: The “4 Youth by Youth” Self-Testing contest engaged a broad audience of young people to generate ideas and perspectives on how to promote HIVST. This process informed the development of youth innovated implementation strategies to increase uptake of HIVST among adolescents and youth at risk for HIV. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7259504 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72595042020-06-08 The 4 youth by youth HIV self-testing crowdsourcing contest: A qualitative evaluation Iwelunmor, Juliet Ezechi, Oliver Obiezu-Umeh, Chisom Gbaja-Biamila, Titilola Nwaozuru, Ucheoma Oladele, David Musa, Adesola Z. Idigbe, Ifeoma Uzoaru, Florida Airhihenbuwa, Collins Muessig, Kathryn Conserve, Donaldson F. Kapogiannis, Bill Tucker, Joseph D. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Crowdsourcing, a participatory approach to solicit ideas from a large group of diverse individuals, provides an opportunity to nurture youth participation in HIV self-testing service design. The objective of this study was to describe the responses to a crowdsourcing contest aimed at soliciting ideas on how to promote HIV self-testing (HIVST) among young people in Nigeria. METHODS: The “4 Youth by Youth” HIV Self-Testing Crowdsourcing contest was an online and off-line contest that asked Nigerian youth (10–24 years old) for ideas in response to the following: How might we promote HIVST among young people in Nigeria? All data were collected and analyzed between October 2018, and June 2019. Ideas and perceptions generated from the crowdsourcing contest were qualitatively analyzed using thematic content analysis. Specifically, four reviewers analyzed whether the ideas generated were desirable (appealing to young people), feasible (easy to implement) and impactful (will significantly influence HIVST uptake among young people). RESULTS: A total of 903 entries were received in response to the contest prompt. Participants submitted entries in various forms: online form (39.7%), offline Dropbox (44.6%), email (6.1%) and WhatsApp (9.7%). Of the total entries, 85% (n = 769/903) entries were eligible and were scored as having either high, moderate or low level of feasibility, impact and desirability, on a 3-point Likert scale. A significant portion of the entries were given a score of 3 for feasibility (4.9%), desirability (7.1%), impact (3.0%) or a total overall score of 7 or more (8.2%). The three main themes that emerged from the entries include:1) Peer-to-peer distribution and leveraging on existing infrastructures 2) Youth-Oriented Branding of the HIVST Kit 3) Mobile platforms and social media technology. CONCLUSION: The “4 Youth by Youth” Self-Testing contest engaged a broad audience of young people to generate ideas and perspectives on how to promote HIVST. This process informed the development of youth innovated implementation strategies to increase uptake of HIVST among adolescents and youth at risk for HIV. Public Library of Science 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7259504/ /pubmed/32469971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233698 Text en © 2020 Iwelunmor et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Iwelunmor, Juliet Ezechi, Oliver Obiezu-Umeh, Chisom Gbaja-Biamila, Titilola Nwaozuru, Ucheoma Oladele, David Musa, Adesola Z. Idigbe, Ifeoma Uzoaru, Florida Airhihenbuwa, Collins Muessig, Kathryn Conserve, Donaldson F. Kapogiannis, Bill Tucker, Joseph D. The 4 youth by youth HIV self-testing crowdsourcing contest: A qualitative evaluation |
title | The 4 youth by youth HIV self-testing crowdsourcing contest: A qualitative evaluation |
title_full | The 4 youth by youth HIV self-testing crowdsourcing contest: A qualitative evaluation |
title_fullStr | The 4 youth by youth HIV self-testing crowdsourcing contest: A qualitative evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | The 4 youth by youth HIV self-testing crowdsourcing contest: A qualitative evaluation |
title_short | The 4 youth by youth HIV self-testing crowdsourcing contest: A qualitative evaluation |
title_sort | 4 youth by youth hiv self-testing crowdsourcing contest: a qualitative evaluation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7259504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32469971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233698 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iwelunmorjuliet the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT ezechioliver the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT obiezuumehchisom the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT gbajabiamilatitilola the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT nwaozuruucheoma the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT oladeledavid the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT musaadesolaz the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT idigbeifeoma the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT uzoaruflorida the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT airhihenbuwacollins the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT muessigkathryn the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT conservedonaldsonf the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT kapogiannisbill the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT tuckerjosephd the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT iwelunmorjuliet 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT ezechioliver 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT obiezuumehchisom 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT gbajabiamilatitilola 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT nwaozuruucheoma 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT oladeledavid 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT musaadesolaz 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT idigbeifeoma 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT uzoaruflorida 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT airhihenbuwacollins 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT muessigkathryn 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT conservedonaldsonf 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT kapogiannisbill 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation AT tuckerjosephd 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation |