Cargando…

The 4 youth by youth HIV self-testing crowdsourcing contest: A qualitative evaluation

INTRODUCTION: Crowdsourcing, a participatory approach to solicit ideas from a large group of diverse individuals, provides an opportunity to nurture youth participation in HIV self-testing service design. The objective of this study was to describe the responses to a crowdsourcing contest aimed at s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iwelunmor, Juliet, Ezechi, Oliver, Obiezu-Umeh, Chisom, Gbaja-Biamila, Titilola, Nwaozuru, Ucheoma, Oladele, David, Musa, Adesola Z., Idigbe, Ifeoma, Uzoaru, Florida, Airhihenbuwa, Collins, Muessig, Kathryn, Conserve, Donaldson F., Kapogiannis, Bill, Tucker, Joseph D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7259504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32469971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233698
_version_ 1783540148299890688
author Iwelunmor, Juliet
Ezechi, Oliver
Obiezu-Umeh, Chisom
Gbaja-Biamila, Titilola
Nwaozuru, Ucheoma
Oladele, David
Musa, Adesola Z.
Idigbe, Ifeoma
Uzoaru, Florida
Airhihenbuwa, Collins
Muessig, Kathryn
Conserve, Donaldson F.
Kapogiannis, Bill
Tucker, Joseph D.
author_facet Iwelunmor, Juliet
Ezechi, Oliver
Obiezu-Umeh, Chisom
Gbaja-Biamila, Titilola
Nwaozuru, Ucheoma
Oladele, David
Musa, Adesola Z.
Idigbe, Ifeoma
Uzoaru, Florida
Airhihenbuwa, Collins
Muessig, Kathryn
Conserve, Donaldson F.
Kapogiannis, Bill
Tucker, Joseph D.
author_sort Iwelunmor, Juliet
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Crowdsourcing, a participatory approach to solicit ideas from a large group of diverse individuals, provides an opportunity to nurture youth participation in HIV self-testing service design. The objective of this study was to describe the responses to a crowdsourcing contest aimed at soliciting ideas on how to promote HIV self-testing (HIVST) among young people in Nigeria. METHODS: The “4 Youth by Youth” HIV Self-Testing Crowdsourcing contest was an online and off-line contest that asked Nigerian youth (10–24 years old) for ideas in response to the following: How might we promote HIVST among young people in Nigeria? All data were collected and analyzed between October 2018, and June 2019. Ideas and perceptions generated from the crowdsourcing contest were qualitatively analyzed using thematic content analysis. Specifically, four reviewers analyzed whether the ideas generated were desirable (appealing to young people), feasible (easy to implement) and impactful (will significantly influence HIVST uptake among young people). RESULTS: A total of 903 entries were received in response to the contest prompt. Participants submitted entries in various forms: online form (39.7%), offline Dropbox (44.6%), email (6.1%) and WhatsApp (9.7%). Of the total entries, 85% (n = 769/903) entries were eligible and were scored as having either high, moderate or low level of feasibility, impact and desirability, on a 3-point Likert scale. A significant portion of the entries were given a score of 3 for feasibility (4.9%), desirability (7.1%), impact (3.0%) or a total overall score of 7 or more (8.2%). The three main themes that emerged from the entries include:1) Peer-to-peer distribution and leveraging on existing infrastructures 2) Youth-Oriented Branding of the HIVST Kit 3) Mobile platforms and social media technology. CONCLUSION: The “4 Youth by Youth” Self-Testing contest engaged a broad audience of young people to generate ideas and perspectives on how to promote HIVST. This process informed the development of youth innovated implementation strategies to increase uptake of HIVST among adolescents and youth at risk for HIV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7259504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72595042020-06-08 The 4 youth by youth HIV self-testing crowdsourcing contest: A qualitative evaluation Iwelunmor, Juliet Ezechi, Oliver Obiezu-Umeh, Chisom Gbaja-Biamila, Titilola Nwaozuru, Ucheoma Oladele, David Musa, Adesola Z. Idigbe, Ifeoma Uzoaru, Florida Airhihenbuwa, Collins Muessig, Kathryn Conserve, Donaldson F. Kapogiannis, Bill Tucker, Joseph D. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Crowdsourcing, a participatory approach to solicit ideas from a large group of diverse individuals, provides an opportunity to nurture youth participation in HIV self-testing service design. The objective of this study was to describe the responses to a crowdsourcing contest aimed at soliciting ideas on how to promote HIV self-testing (HIVST) among young people in Nigeria. METHODS: The “4 Youth by Youth” HIV Self-Testing Crowdsourcing contest was an online and off-line contest that asked Nigerian youth (10–24 years old) for ideas in response to the following: How might we promote HIVST among young people in Nigeria? All data were collected and analyzed between October 2018, and June 2019. Ideas and perceptions generated from the crowdsourcing contest were qualitatively analyzed using thematic content analysis. Specifically, four reviewers analyzed whether the ideas generated were desirable (appealing to young people), feasible (easy to implement) and impactful (will significantly influence HIVST uptake among young people). RESULTS: A total of 903 entries were received in response to the contest prompt. Participants submitted entries in various forms: online form (39.7%), offline Dropbox (44.6%), email (6.1%) and WhatsApp (9.7%). Of the total entries, 85% (n = 769/903) entries were eligible and were scored as having either high, moderate or low level of feasibility, impact and desirability, on a 3-point Likert scale. A significant portion of the entries were given a score of 3 for feasibility (4.9%), desirability (7.1%), impact (3.0%) or a total overall score of 7 or more (8.2%). The three main themes that emerged from the entries include:1) Peer-to-peer distribution and leveraging on existing infrastructures 2) Youth-Oriented Branding of the HIVST Kit 3) Mobile platforms and social media technology. CONCLUSION: The “4 Youth by Youth” Self-Testing contest engaged a broad audience of young people to generate ideas and perspectives on how to promote HIVST. This process informed the development of youth innovated implementation strategies to increase uptake of HIVST among adolescents and youth at risk for HIV. Public Library of Science 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7259504/ /pubmed/32469971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233698 Text en © 2020 Iwelunmor et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Iwelunmor, Juliet
Ezechi, Oliver
Obiezu-Umeh, Chisom
Gbaja-Biamila, Titilola
Nwaozuru, Ucheoma
Oladele, David
Musa, Adesola Z.
Idigbe, Ifeoma
Uzoaru, Florida
Airhihenbuwa, Collins
Muessig, Kathryn
Conserve, Donaldson F.
Kapogiannis, Bill
Tucker, Joseph D.
The 4 youth by youth HIV self-testing crowdsourcing contest: A qualitative evaluation
title The 4 youth by youth HIV self-testing crowdsourcing contest: A qualitative evaluation
title_full The 4 youth by youth HIV self-testing crowdsourcing contest: A qualitative evaluation
title_fullStr The 4 youth by youth HIV self-testing crowdsourcing contest: A qualitative evaluation
title_full_unstemmed The 4 youth by youth HIV self-testing crowdsourcing contest: A qualitative evaluation
title_short The 4 youth by youth HIV self-testing crowdsourcing contest: A qualitative evaluation
title_sort 4 youth by youth hiv self-testing crowdsourcing contest: a qualitative evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7259504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32469971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233698
work_keys_str_mv AT iwelunmorjuliet the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT ezechioliver the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT obiezuumehchisom the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT gbajabiamilatitilola the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT nwaozuruucheoma the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT oladeledavid the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT musaadesolaz the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT idigbeifeoma the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT uzoaruflorida the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT airhihenbuwacollins the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT muessigkathryn the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT conservedonaldsonf the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT kapogiannisbill the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT tuckerjosephd the4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT iwelunmorjuliet 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT ezechioliver 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT obiezuumehchisom 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT gbajabiamilatitilola 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT nwaozuruucheoma 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT oladeledavid 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT musaadesolaz 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT idigbeifeoma 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT uzoaruflorida 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT airhihenbuwacollins 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT muessigkathryn 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT conservedonaldsonf 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT kapogiannisbill 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation
AT tuckerjosephd 4youthbyyouthhivselftestingcrowdsourcingcontestaqualitativeevaluation