Cargando…
Monitoring maternal near miss/severe maternal morbidity: A systematic review of global practices
There is international interest in monitoring severe events in the obstetrical population, commonly referred to as maternal near miss or severe maternal morbidity. These events can have significant consequences for individuals in this population and further study can inform practices to reduce both...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7259583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32470099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233697 |
_version_ | 1783540160404652032 |
---|---|
author | England, Natalie Madill, Julia Metcalfe, Amy Magee, Laura Cooper, Stephanie Salmon, Charleen Adhikari, Kamala |
author_facet | England, Natalie Madill, Julia Metcalfe, Amy Magee, Laura Cooper, Stephanie Salmon, Charleen Adhikari, Kamala |
author_sort | England, Natalie |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is international interest in monitoring severe events in the obstetrical population, commonly referred to as maternal near miss or severe maternal morbidity. These events can have significant consequences for individuals in this population and further study can inform practices to reduce both maternal morbidity and mortality. Numerous surveillance systems exist but we lack a standardized approach. Given the current inconsistencies and the importance in monitoring these events, this study aimed to identify and compare commonly used surveillance methods. In June 2018, we systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL using terms related to monitoring/surveillance and maternal near miss/severe maternal morbidity. We included papers that used at least three indicators to monitor for these events and collected data on specific surveillance methods. We calculated the rate of maternal near miss/severe maternal morbidity in hospitalization data obtained from the 2016 US National Inpatient Sample using five common surveillance methods. Of 18,832 abstracts, 178 papers were included in our review. 198 indicators were used in studies included in our review; 71.2% (n = 141) of these were used in <10% of included studies and only 6.1% (n = 12) were used in >50% of studies included in our review. Eclampsia was the only indicator that was assessed in >80% of included studies. The rate of these events in American hospitalization data varied depending on the criteria used, ranging from 5.07% (95% CI = 5.02, 5.11) with the Centers for Disease Control criteria and 7.85% (95% CI = 7.79, 7.91) using the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Our review highlights inconsistencies in monitoring practices within and between developed and developing countries. Given the wide variation in monitoring approaches observed and the likely contributing factors for these differences, it may be more feasible for clinical and academic efforts to focus on standardizing approaches in developed and developing countries independently at this time. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42018096858. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7259583 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72595832020-06-08 Monitoring maternal near miss/severe maternal morbidity: A systematic review of global practices England, Natalie Madill, Julia Metcalfe, Amy Magee, Laura Cooper, Stephanie Salmon, Charleen Adhikari, Kamala PLoS One Research Article There is international interest in monitoring severe events in the obstetrical population, commonly referred to as maternal near miss or severe maternal morbidity. These events can have significant consequences for individuals in this population and further study can inform practices to reduce both maternal morbidity and mortality. Numerous surveillance systems exist but we lack a standardized approach. Given the current inconsistencies and the importance in monitoring these events, this study aimed to identify and compare commonly used surveillance methods. In June 2018, we systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL using terms related to monitoring/surveillance and maternal near miss/severe maternal morbidity. We included papers that used at least three indicators to monitor for these events and collected data on specific surveillance methods. We calculated the rate of maternal near miss/severe maternal morbidity in hospitalization data obtained from the 2016 US National Inpatient Sample using five common surveillance methods. Of 18,832 abstracts, 178 papers were included in our review. 198 indicators were used in studies included in our review; 71.2% (n = 141) of these were used in <10% of included studies and only 6.1% (n = 12) were used in >50% of studies included in our review. Eclampsia was the only indicator that was assessed in >80% of included studies. The rate of these events in American hospitalization data varied depending on the criteria used, ranging from 5.07% (95% CI = 5.02, 5.11) with the Centers for Disease Control criteria and 7.85% (95% CI = 7.79, 7.91) using the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Our review highlights inconsistencies in monitoring practices within and between developed and developing countries. Given the wide variation in monitoring approaches observed and the likely contributing factors for these differences, it may be more feasible for clinical and academic efforts to focus on standardizing approaches in developed and developing countries independently at this time. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42018096858. Public Library of Science 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7259583/ /pubmed/32470099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233697 Text en © 2020 England et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article England, Natalie Madill, Julia Metcalfe, Amy Magee, Laura Cooper, Stephanie Salmon, Charleen Adhikari, Kamala Monitoring maternal near miss/severe maternal morbidity: A systematic review of global practices |
title | Monitoring maternal near miss/severe maternal morbidity: A systematic review of global practices |
title_full | Monitoring maternal near miss/severe maternal morbidity: A systematic review of global practices |
title_fullStr | Monitoring maternal near miss/severe maternal morbidity: A systematic review of global practices |
title_full_unstemmed | Monitoring maternal near miss/severe maternal morbidity: A systematic review of global practices |
title_short | Monitoring maternal near miss/severe maternal morbidity: A systematic review of global practices |
title_sort | monitoring maternal near miss/severe maternal morbidity: a systematic review of global practices |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7259583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32470099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233697 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT englandnatalie monitoringmaternalnearmissseverematernalmorbidityasystematicreviewofglobalpractices AT madilljulia monitoringmaternalnearmissseverematernalmorbidityasystematicreviewofglobalpractices AT metcalfeamy monitoringmaternalnearmissseverematernalmorbidityasystematicreviewofglobalpractices AT mageelaura monitoringmaternalnearmissseverematernalmorbidityasystematicreviewofglobalpractices AT cooperstephanie monitoringmaternalnearmissseverematernalmorbidityasystematicreviewofglobalpractices AT salmoncharleen monitoringmaternalnearmissseverematernalmorbidityasystematicreviewofglobalpractices AT adhikarikamala monitoringmaternalnearmissseverematernalmorbidityasystematicreviewofglobalpractices |